No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hegel's Philosophy of History and the Postcolonial Realization of Concrete Bildung
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 May 2024
Abstract
Hegel's Philosophy of History can be characterized as Eurocentric and one finds in it many problematic passages, and even racist statements, as well as a legitimization of colonialism which is presented as a means of education (Bildung). Nevertheless, this article argues that it is possible to reject such judgements and at the same time hold on to the basic intention of Hegel's theories of freedom and Bildung. While the concept of freedom as self-determination is certainly applied in a Eurocentric manner by Hegel in his Philosophy of History, this concept is not Eurocentric at its core. To understand this ‘core’, one has to go back to Hegel's logic of the concept, which finally leads me to a concept of ‘concrete Bildung’. The struggles for self-determination of the colonized peoples must be understood in terms of a further development of the realization of the concept of freedom. If one wants to think Hegel's Philosophy of History meaningfully beyond Hegel's own time, one is inevitably led to the necessity of a liberation of the colonized, for there is a need for a further extension of the consciousness of freedom that actually is inclusive. This demand is contained in Hegel's thought itself, but it still remains abstract with him and must therefore be developed beyond him.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain
References
Al-e Ahmad, J. (1997), Gharbzadegi (Weststruckness), trans. Green, J. and Alizadeh, A.. Costa Mesa: Mazda.Google Scholar
Allen, A. (2016), The End of Progress. Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, A. (2020), ‘Begreifen als Kritik: Anmerkungen zu Hegel und Marx’, Hegel-Studien 53/54: 209–24.Google Scholar
Baumann, C. (2021), ‘Was Hegel an Authoritarian Thinker? Reading Hegel's Philosophy of History on the Basis of his Metaphysics’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103:1: 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1998), ‘Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. K. (2021), ‘Decolonizing Critical Theory? Epistemological Justice, Progress, Reparations’, Critical Times 4:1: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielefeldt, H. (2007), ‘Ideengeschichte(n) der Menschenrechte’, in Janz, N. and Risse, T. (eds.), Menschenrechte – Globale Dimension eines universellen Anspruchs. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Bonsiepen, W. (1981), ‘Altpersische Lichtreligion und neupersische Poesie’, in Pöggeler, O., Bonsiepen, W., et al. (eds.), Hegel in Berlin. Preußische Kulturpolitik und idealistische Ästhetik. Zum 150. Todestag des Philosophen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Brauer, O. D. (1982), Dialektik der Zeit. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Metaphysik der Weltgeschichte. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Buchwalter, A. (2009), ‘Is Hegel's Philosophy of History Eurocentric?’, in Dudley, W. (ed.), Hegel and History. Albany NY: SUNY.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, S. (2009), Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhawan, N. (2014), ‘Affirmative Sabotage of the Master's Tools: The Paradox of Postcolonial Enlightenment’, in Dhawan, N. (ed.), Decolonizing Enlightenment. Transnational Justice, Human Rights and Democracy in a Postcolonial World. Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C. (2014), Dialektik der Moderne. Globalisierung und Kultur aus Sicht der Philosophie Hegels und das Beispiel der Islamischen Revolution im Iran. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C. (2019), ‘Being at Home with Oneself in the Whole – Hegel's Philosophy of Freedom as Actuality’, in Krijnen, C. (ed.), Concepts of Normativity. Kant or Hegel? Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C. (2020), ‘Konkrete Individualität und Integration des Besonderen. Freiheit und Partizipation in Hegel's Staat der Bildung’, Hegel-Studien 53/54: 165–90.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2011), Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
James, D. and Knappik, F. (2021), ‘Das Untote in Hegel: Warum wir über seinen Rassismus reden müssen’, in praefaktisch, 27.05.2021. Available at: https://www.praefaktisch.de/hegel/das-untote-in-hegel-warum-wir-ueber-seinen-rassismus-reden-muessen/?fbclid=IwAR15MKvOU3hp-4hlQWaPFxwuNcdFxmdCiR7OYDMaDARxdN4lgHA8yn4dVZk (last accessed: 14.01.2024).Google Scholar
James, D. and Knappik, F. (2023), ‘Exploring the Metaphysics of Hegel's Racism: The Teleology of the “Concept” and the Taxonomy of Races’, Hegel Bulletin 44:1: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1912), ‘Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf’, in Kant's gesammelte Schriften, ed. Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. VIII. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, H. (1993), ‘Hegel und Afrika: das Glas zerspringt’, Hegel-Studien 28: 303–25.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, H. (2005), Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel interkulturell gelesen. Nordhausen: Bautz.Google Scholar
Krijnen, C. (2019), ‘How is Practical Philosophy Speculatively possible?’, in Krijnen, C. (ed.), Concepts of Normativity. Kant or Hegel? Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1984), ‘The British Rule in India’, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Gesamtausgabe [MEGA], ed. Institutes for Marxism-Leninism in Berlin and Moscow, I/12. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Mascat, J. M. H. (2014), ‘Hegel and the Black Atlantic: Universalism, Humanism and Relation’, in Dhawan, N. (ed.), Decolonizing Enlightenment. Transnational Justice, Human Rights and Democracy in a Postcolonial World. Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar
Matasci, D., et al. (eds.) (2020), Education and Development in Colonial and Postcolonial Africa. Policies, Paradigms, and Entanglements, 1890s–1980s. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2017), Does History Make Sense? Hegel on the Historical Shapes of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, M. (1982), ‘Fortschritt und Dialektik in Hegels Geschichtsphilosophie’, in Riedel, M., Zwischen Tradition und Revolution. Studien zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. (2003), ‘Europäisierung als europäisches Problem’, in Ritter, J., Metaphysik und Politik. Studien zu Aristoteles und Hegel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sandkaulen, B. (2014), ‘Hegels Konzep(e) der Bildung’, in Hoffmann, T. S. (ed.), Grundbegriffe des Praktischen. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
Shayegan, D. (1997), Cultural Schizophrenia. Islamic Societies Confronting the West, trans. Howe, J.. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (2001), ‘Vorsehung und Entwicklung in Hegels Geschichtsphilosophie’, in Bubner, R. and Mesch, W. (eds.), Die Weltgeschichte – das Weltgericht? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Stojanov, K. (2018), Education, Self-consciousness and Social Action. Bildung as a Neo-Hegelian Concept. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2017): ‘Europe and Eurocentrism’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 91:1: 83–104.Google Scholar