Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:46:37.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politics of Anthropology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Extract

ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY ORIGINALLY FOUND THEIR more immediate inspiration in an evolutionary or Jacob's Ladder vision of human societies, the idea of Progress. Social forms were seen as located along some great Chain of Being, which eventually leads to this-worldly salvation by this-worldly means. But there the resemblance ends. Sociology was rooted in a primarily historical evolutionism, in the perception, by the generation of Condorcet and Hegel, that human history is a story of cumulative change, and in the hope that the pattern of this change was the key to the meaning of life. History was to reveal the inner potential and destiny of human society. By contrast, the evolutionism which somewhat later, around the middle of the nineteenth century, gave birth to anthropology, was markedly biological, and came to be much influenced by Darwin.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Geertz, C., ‘Evans Pritchard’s African Transparencies’, Raritan, Fall 1983. Republished in Geertz, C., Works and Lives: the Anthropologist as Author, Oxford, Polity, 1988.Google Scholar

3 The Army Quarterly, 1973.