Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T01:56:30.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision‐making in the Community: The Commission‐Council dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Extract

We may assume that the present institutional system of the European Communities is only one stage in the long and arduous development of a European constitution. Looked at half a century hence, the trials and errors of the Coal and Steel Community; the abortive projects for a defence community and a political community; the successes and limitations of EEC and Euratom; and the vain search of the six pioneer countries for a formula for political union will appear as the first hesitant but sigruficant steps towards a complete federal system. Limited though the existing Communities are to economic and social affairs, they have now passed a point where their economies are inextricably linked, and where, although progress to more complete political unity is not automatic it is, in the long run, inevitable.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A term used by M. Marjolin to the press to describe the package deal of 12 May 1966, concluded when he was acting as president of the Commission.

2 France, Germany and Italy have four votes, Belgium and the Netherlands two votes each, Luxembourg one, and twelve votes are needed for a weighted majority: thus a major country can be outvoted unless able to obtain the support of one of its medium‐sized partners.