Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:16:19.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The UNESCO Regime for the Protection of World Heritage as Prototype of an Autonomy-Gaining International Institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (World Heritage Convention), which entered into force on 17 December 1975, established a complex governance regime at the international level. The rationale behind the establishment of this regime was the international communities' realization that the world contained natural and cultural sites which were so unique and outstanding that they should by no means become embroiled in the onslaught of human material progress. It was argued that these sites must be protected and conserved for posterity since they, irrespective of the territory in which they were located, belonged to all peoples and, thus, formed part of the common heritage of mankind. Although the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) regime for the protection of World Heritage is seemingly afforded with weak instruments, such as the inscription of properties on the World Heritage List or on the List of World Heritage in Danger, its activities increasingly play a role, not least in national administrative procedures. The cases of Yellowstone National Park in the United States, Cologne Cathedral and Dresden Elbe Valley in Germany, and Kakadu National Park in Australia are only a few examples in this regard.

Type
Thematic Studies
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 UNTS, Vol. 1037, No. 15511.Google Scholar

2 See World Heritage Convention, Preamble, recitals 2, 5 and 6; in literature e.g. Germana Canino, Il ruolo svolto dall'UNESCO nella tutela del patrimonio mondiale culturale e naturale, in La protezione del patrimonio mondiale culturale e naturale a venticinque anni dalla Convenzione dell'UNESCO del 1972, 1, 45–46 (Maria C. Ciciriello ed., 1997); Maria E. E. Castelli, Protección Jurídica del Patrimonio Cultural de la Humanidad 17–21 (1987); Manlio Frigo, La protezione dei beni culturali nel diritto internazionale 281–310 (1986); Dolzer, Rudolf, Die Deklaration des Kulturguts zum “common heritage of mankind”, in Rechtsfragen des internationalen Kulturgüterschutzes 13, 17–20 (Rudolf Dolzer, Erik Jayme & Reinhard Mußgnug eds., 1994); Fechner, Frank, Prinzipien des Kulturgüterschutzes, in Prinzipien des Kulturgüterschutzes 11, 33–34 (Frank Fechner, Thomas Oppermann & Lyndel V. Prott eds., 1996); Markus Müller, Kulturgüterschutz: Mittel nationaler Repräsentation oder Wahrung des Gemeinsamen Erbes der Menschheit?, in Prinzipien des Kulturgüterschutzes 257, 268–271 (Frank Fechner, Thomas Oppermann & Lyndel V. Prott eds., 1996); von Schorlemer, Sabine, Der internationale Schutz von Kulturgütern gegen Umwelteinflüsse, in Prinzipien des Kulturgüterschutzes 225, 246–47 (Frank Fechner, Thomas Oppermann & Lyndel V. Prott eds., 1996).Google Scholar

3 See Jeremy Rabkin, Why Sovereignty Matters 46–48 (1998).Google Scholar

4 See Odendahl, Kerstin, Protecţia bunurilor culturale în dreptul internaţional – literă moartă sau protecţie eficientă?, 4 II Caiete de drept international 11–17 (2006); Zacharias, Diana, Cologne Cathedral versus Skyscrapers – World Heritage Protection as Archetype of a Multilevel System, 10 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Max Planck UNYB) 273–366 (2006).Google Scholar

5 See. German Federal Constitutional Court, 17 Landes- und Kommunalverwaltung (LKV) 509–513 (2007); Higher Administrative Court of Saxony, 60 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV) 564–568 (2007); Bogdandy, Armin von & Zacharias, Diana, Zum Schutz der Weltkulturerbekonvention im deutschen Rechtsraum, 26 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ) 527–532 (2007); Fastenrath, Ulrich, Der Schutz des Weltkulturerbes in Deutschland, 59 DÖV 1017–1027 (2006); Kilian, Michael, Die Brücke über die Elbe: völkerrechtliche Wirkungen des Welterbe-Übereinkommens der UNESCO, 18 LKV 248–254 (2008).Google Scholar

6 See Maswood, S. Javed, Kakadu and the Politics of World Heritage Listing, 54 Australian Journal of International Affairs 357–372 (2000); Ben Boer & Graeme Wiffen, Heritage Law in Australia 87 (2006).Google Scholar

7 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre, World Heritage: Challenges for the Millenium 26–28 (2007). The brochure can be downloaded under: http://whc.unesco.org/documents/publi_millennium_en.pdf.Google Scholar

8 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Brief History, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/169/.Google Scholar

9 Ciciriello, Maria C., L'ICCROM, l'ICOMOS e l'IUCN e la salvaguardia del patrimonio mondiale culturale e naturale, in La protezione del patrimonio mondiale (note 2), at 110, 119 and 122; Gornig, Gilbert H., Der internationale Kulturgüterschutz, in Kulturgüterschutz – internationale und nationale Aspekte 17, 45–46 (Gilbert H. Gornig, Hans-Detlef Horns & Dietrich Murswiek eds., 2007).Google Scholar

10 See Haigh, David J., World Heritage – Principle and Practice: a Case for Change, 17 Environmental and Planning Law Journal 199 (2000).Google Scholar

11 See Robin R. Churchill & Alan V. Lowe, The Law of the Sea 227 (3rd edition, 1999).Google Scholar

12 Quoted by Eidsvik, Harold K., The World Heritage Convention Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, in Proceedings of a Workshop Session on Critical Issues for Protected Areas held during the 18th Session of the General Assembly of IUCN 15 (1990).Google Scholar

13 IUCN Statutes, Part III, s. 4; the Statutes are available at: http://www.iucn.org/members/Documents/Statutes.pdf.Google Scholar

14 See Action Plan for the Human Environment, Recommendation No. 99, in Report on the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment 1972, available at: http://www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=97&ArticleID=1511&l=en.Google Scholar

15 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, World Heritage: States Parties, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/. About the history of the Convention in more detail, see Fitschen, Thomas, Internationaler Schutz des kulturellen Erbes in der Welt, in Internationaler Kulturgüterschutz und deutsche Frage 183, 185–189 (Wilfried Fiedler ed., 1991); Francioni, Francesco, Thirty Years On: Is the World Heritage Convention Ready for the 21st Century?, 12 Italian Yearbook of International Law 13, 15–16 (2002); Barbara Genius-Devime, Bedeutung und Grenzen des Erbes der Menschheit im völkerrechtlichen Kulturgüterschutz 140–143 (1996); Meyer, Robert L., Travaux Préparatoires for the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, 2 Earth Law Journal 45–81 (1976); Martin P. Wyss, Kultur als eine Dimension der Völkerrechtsordnung 125–131 (1992); Russell Train, The World Heritage Convention – The First Twenty Years and Beyond, speech held at the 16th session of the World Heritage Committee on 7 December 1992, available as Doc. WHC-92/CONF.002/12 of 14 December 1992 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom92.htm#inf1.Google Scholar

16 See Kerstin Odendahl, Kulturgüterschutz 136 (2005).Google Scholar

17 See Maswood (note 6), at 357.Google Scholar

18 See Galenskaya, Ljudmila, International Co-operation in Cultural Affairs, 198 III Recueil des cours 265, 277 (1986); Genius-Devime (note 15), at 288–289; Wyss (note 15), at 130–131.Google Scholar

19 Sabine von Schorlemer, Internationaler Kulturgüterschutz 134 (1993).Google Scholar

20 See Fitschen (note 15), at 183, 196; Müller (note 2), at 257, 269 with further references.Google Scholar

21 See Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 318322.Google Scholar

22 See Maswood (note 6), at 357, 358.Google Scholar

23 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, World Heritage List, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list; see also UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 36–37.Google Scholar

24 UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 45.Google Scholar

25 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Twenty-two sites inscribed on the UNESCO's World Heritage List, and one deleted during the Committee meeting in Christchurch, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/365; see for the situation before the 2007 meeting Peter Strasser, “Putting Reform into Action” – Thirty Years of the World Heritage Convention, 11 International Journal of Cultural Property 215, 219 and 254 (2002).Google Scholar

26 See Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 276 with references.Google Scholar

28 See ICCROM, ICCROM Member States, available at: http://www.iccrom.org/eng/00about_en/00_01govern_en/memstates_en.shtml; Ciciriello (note 9), 110, 111112.Google Scholar

29 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), 50.Google Scholar

30 See arts. 11(1), 13(1) and 19 of the World Heritage Convention and para. 120 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

31 See art. 13(7) of the Convention; paras. 35, 37, 143 to 146 and 248 to 250 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

32 See arts. 11(2), 13(3) and 21(3) of the Convention; paras. 153 to 160 and 247 to 254 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

33 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), 20.Google Scholar

34 See e.g. UNESCO World Heritage, World Heritage in Danger, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/pg.cfm?cid=158.Google Scholar

35 UNTS, Vol. 4, No. 1580.Google Scholar

36 See in this context the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly of States Parties to the World Heritage Convention, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/garules/.Google Scholar

37 See Strasser (note 25), at 215, 228.Google Scholar

38 6th General Assembly Report, para. 22, available as Doc. CC-87/CONF.013/6 of 31 October 1987 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/ga87.pdf.Google Scholar

39 7th General Assembly Report, para. 20, available as Doc. CC-89/CONF.013/6 of 13 November 1989 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/ga89.pdf.Google Scholar

40 Id. at para. 12.Google Scholar

41 9th General Assembly Report, paras. 30 and 32, available as Doc. CC-93/CONF.003/6 of 2 November 1993 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/ga93.pdf.Google Scholar

42 10th General Assembly Report, paras. 15 to 31, available as Doc. WHC-95/CONF.204/8 of 22 November 1995 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/genass95.htm.Google Scholar

43 See Strasser (note 25), at 215, 229.Google Scholar

44 Report of the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee, 24th session, VI para. 7, quoted by World Heritage Committee Report, 26th session, para. 37, available as Doc. WHC-02/CONF.202/12 of 4 June 2002 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2002/whc-02-conf202-12e.pdf.Google Scholar

45 See also Fitschen (note 15), at 183, 198.Google Scholar

46 Haigh (note 10), at 199, 201.Google Scholar

48 See about the actual members UNESCO, Bureau of the World Heritage Committee, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/bureau/.Google Scholar

49 Maswood (note 6), at 357, 361.Google Scholar

50 The first “Strategic Orientations” adopted by the Committee in 1992 are contained in annex II of Doc. WHC-92/CONF.002/12 (note 15). In 2002, the World Heritage Committee revised its strategic objectives; the Budapest Declaration on World Heritage is available as Doc. WHC-02/CONF.202/5 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2002/whc-02-conf202-25e.pdf#decision.9.Google Scholar

51 See about legal personality in international law, e.g., ICJ, Reparations Case, ICJ Reports 1949, 174; Bardo Faßbender, Die Völkerrechtssubjektivität internationaler Organisationen, 37 Österreichische Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrrecht 17–49 (1986).Google Scholar

52 See Circular Letter No. 16 of the General-Director of UNESCO of 21 October 2003, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/circs/circ03-16e.pdf.Google Scholar

53 See (note 50).Google Scholar

54 See Strasser (note 25), at 215, 217.Google Scholar

55 See Boguslavsky, Mark M., Der Begriff des Kulturguts und seine rechtliche Relevanz, in Rechtsfragen des internationalen Kulturgüterschutzes (note 2), at 3, 7.Google Scholar

56 Titchen, Sarah M., On the Construction of “Outstanding Universal Value,” 1 Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 235, 236 (1996); Fitschen (note 15), at 183, 191.Google Scholar

57 See (note 27).Google Scholar

58 See World Heritage Committee Final Report, first session, para. 56, available as Doc. CC-77/CONF.001/9 of 17 October 1977 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom77.htm.Google Scholar

59 UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 32.Google Scholar

60 See also Strasser (note 25), at 215, 247; Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 307.Google Scholar

61 See World Heritage Committee Report, 23rd session, chapter XIII para. 12, available as Doc. WHC-99/CONF.209/22 of 2 March 2000 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom99.htm.Google Scholar

62 International Expert Meeting on the Revision of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Final Report, available as annex to Doc. WHC-2000/CONF.202/17 of 30 May 2000 at: http://whc.unesco.org/canterbury/final-eng.pdf.Google Scholar

63 World Heritage Committee Report, 24th session, chapter VI para. 4, available as Doc. WHC-2000/CONF.204/21 of 16 February 2001 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom00.htm.Google Scholar

64 See World Heritage Committee Report, 26th session, annex II, available as Doc. WHC-02/CONF.202/14A of 23 May 2002 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2002/whc-02-conf202-14ae.pdf; Strasser (note 25), at 215, 248250.Google Scholar

65 World Heritage Committee Report, 25th session, chapter VI, available as Doc. WHC-01/CONF.208/24 of 8 February 2002 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom01.htm#sec6.Google Scholar

66 World Heritage Committee, Decisions adopted at the 27th session, para. 10, available as Doc. WHC-03/27.COM/24 of 10 December 2003 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/decrec03.htm#sec10.Google Scholar

67 World Heritage Committee, Decisions adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 7th extraordinary session, chapter 4A para. V, available as Doc. WHC-04/7EXT.COM/17 of 13 January 2005 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2004/whc04-7extcom-17e.pdf.Google Scholar

68 See World Heritage Committee (note 65), chapter VI para. 1 (3rd prong).Google Scholar

69 Bureau of the World Heritage Committee Report, special session, chaper III para. 22, available as Doc. WHC.2000/CONF.202/4 Rev. 1 (SPE) of 16 January 2001 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repbur00ss.htm#sec3.Google Scholar

70 Note 1 sentence 2 under para. 3 of the Operational Guidelines 1977, Doc. CC-77/CONF.001/9 of 19 October 1977, 56, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom77.htm.Google Scholar

71 See with regard to the dispute about the legal significance of the Operational Guidelines during the 1996 session World Heritage Committee Report, 20th session, chapter XVII para. 7 and annexes 1–4 to IX, available as Doc. WHC-96/CONF.201/21 of 10 March 1997 at: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom96.htm; Strasser (note 25), 215, 246.Google Scholar

72 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 32.Google Scholar

73 See e.g. World Heritage Newsletter No. 27 of May to August 2000, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/news/27newsen.pdf, which mentions that one important function of the Operational Guidelines is to ensure that States Parties to the Convention are “well informed about the principles which guide the work of the World Heritage Committee.”Google Scholar

74 See World Heritage Committee Report, 25th session, available as Doc. WHC-01/CONF.208/14 of 31 October 2001 at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001264/126443e.pdf.Google Scholar

75 See (note 47).Google Scholar

76 See art. 11(1) sentence 1 of the Convention.Google Scholar

78 See art. 11(1) sentence 2 of the Convention, para. 62 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

79 See para. 70 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

80 See UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 35.Google Scholar

81 See Fitschen (note 15), at 183, 192193.Google Scholar

82 See paras. 134, 135 and 139 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

83 See Australian High Court, Commonwealth v. Tasmania (Franklin Dam Case) [1983] 158 CLR 1; Boer, Ben, Article 34, in The 1972 World Heritage Convention, 355, 356 (Francesco Francioni ed., 2008);; von Bogdandy & Zacharias (note 5), at 527, 530; Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 330331.Google Scholar

84 See World Heritage Committee (note 71), chapter XVII para. 8.Google Scholar

85 See Genius-Devime (note 15), at 316–317.Google Scholar

86 UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 47.Google Scholar

87 See paras 248 to 250 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

88 See José E. Alvarez, International Organizations as Law-makers 87 (2005).Google Scholar

89 See Strasser (note 25), at 215, 218; Léon Pressouyre, The World Heritage Convention – Twenty Years Later 46 (1996).Google Scholar

90 See arts. 11(7) and 29 of the Convention; para. 199 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

91 Para. 169 of the Operational Guidelines 2005.Google Scholar

92 UNESCO World Heritage Centre (note 7), at 20.Google Scholar

93 Boer & Wiffen (note 6), at 70.Google Scholar

94 See Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 310322.Google Scholar

95 Boer & Wiffen (note 6), at 70.Google Scholar

96 See Christina Hotz, Deutsche Städte und UNESCO-Welterbe. Probleme und Erfahrungen mit der Umsetzung eines globalisierten Denkmalschutzkonzeptes 42 (2004).Google Scholar

97 See Majone, Giandomenico, Delegation of Regulatory Powers in a Mixed Polity, 8 European Law Journal 319, 337 (2002); Leeson, Peter T., Contracts without Government, 18 Journal of Private Enterprise 35–36 (2003).Google Scholar

98 See Zacharias (note 4), 273, 366.Google Scholar

99 See Fastenrath (note 5), at 1017, 1019 and 1026–1027.Google Scholar

100 Queensland v. Commonwealth [1989] 167 CLR 232, 240242.Google Scholar

101 Vernhes, Jane A., Implementation of the World Heritage Convention in South East Asia and the Pacific, in Proceedings of a Workshop Session on Critical Issues for Protected Areas, held during the 18th session of the General Assembly of IUCN on 1 December 1990, at 26; see Haigh (note 10), at 199, 205–206; von Schorlemer (note 19), at 132–133.Google Scholar

102 von Bogdandy & Zacharias (note 5), at 527–528; Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 308.Google Scholar

103 See with regard to the measures of the federal, state and municipal level in Germany Zacharias (note 4), 273, 331360.Google Scholar

104 See Haigh (note 10), at 199, 208 and 211–212.Google Scholar

105 See Frigo (note 2), at 189.Google Scholar

106 Haigh (note 10), at 199, 211.Google Scholar

107 See id. at 199, 208.Google Scholar

108 Odendahl (note 16), at 137.Google Scholar

109 Frank Fechner, Rechtlicher Schutz archäologischen Kulturguts 98–99 (1991); Genius-Devime (note 15), at 316; Odendahl (note 16), at 137.Google Scholar

110 Fitschen (note 15), at 183, 200; see Francioni (note 15), at 13, 3032.Google Scholar

111 See Boer & Wiffen (note 6), at 70.Google Scholar

112 See Francioni (note 15), at 13, 36.Google Scholar

113 See Zacharias (note 4), at 273, 320322.Google Scholar

114 Maswood (note 6), at 357, 358.Google Scholar

115 See Scheffer, Markus, Der Volkswille als Leerformel, in FAZ No. 123 of 30 May 2007, 37.Google Scholar

116 Federal Constitutional Court (note 5), at 513. See Dieter Bartetzko, Pilatus lebt, in FAZ No. 130 of 8 June 2007, 33; Reinhard Müller, Bürgerwille und Völkerrecht, in FAZ No. 136 of 15 June 2007, 12.Google Scholar

117 See Hildebrand, Daniel, Waldschlößchen ohne Brücke: über Aussetzung und Selbstausschaltung von Demokratie, 40 Kritische Justiz 184–192 (2007). Regarding supposed democratic deficits of the world heritage regime and possible reforms, see Affolder, Natasha, Democratising or Demonising the World Heritage Convention?, 38 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 341–361 (2007).Google Scholar