Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T22:13:37.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Severe Regulations for Toys in the European Union: The New EC Directive from a German Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Philipp Reusch  and
Tobias Ackermann

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

On 18 December 2008, the European Parliament accepted the proposals of the European Commission for amendment of the toy directive. The modifications are published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Following publication of the new directive, the member states have 18 months in which to transpose it into national law. In Germany, in all probability, this will occur in the 2nd Ordinance to the German Geräte- und Produktsicherheitsgesetz (GPSG - Equipment and Product Safety Act). The revised laws will apply two years after the directive has come into force, while the new threshold values for heavy metals will apply in four years. Until then, the old rules will continue to apply. Thus the directive, which is over 20 years old, has been revised following increasing reports of unsafe toys, particularly, though not exclusively, from China. The aim of the amendment is to ensure that toys do not pose any health risks or risks of injury, thus achieving a reduction in the number of toy-related accidents.

Type
Developments
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 8 , 01 August 2009 , pp. 1333 - 1342
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Safety of Toys, COM (2008) 9 final (Jan. 25, 2008).Google Scholar

2 Council Directive 88/378, 1988 O.J. (L 187) 1 (EC).Google Scholar

3 Council Directive 2009/48, 2009 O.J. (L 170) 1 (EC).Google Scholar

4 See Press Statement by the European Commission, IP/08/2026 (Dec. 18 2008), available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/2026&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en; recital 11 of the directive.Google Scholar

5 See Council Decision, 1985 O.J. (C 136) 1.Google Scholar

6 See Kapoor, Arun & Klindt, Thomas, “New Legislative Framework” im EU-Produktsicherheitsrecht - Neue Marktüberwachung in Europa?, 19 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 649, 650 (2008).Google Scholar

7 See Krieger, Stephan, Das technische Umweltrecht der Gemeinschaft nach der “Neuen Konzeption,” 12 Umwelt -und Planungsrecht (UPR) 401 (1992).Google Scholar

8 See Klindt, Thomas, Verbraucherschutz durch Integration sicherheitsrechtlicher Anforderungen in die Gerätekonstruktion, 16 Verbraucher und Recht (VuR) 394, 396 (2001).Google Scholar

9 See Scheel, Kurt-Christian, Auslegung von EU-Richtlinien und Entscheidungsbefugnis der Kommission, 45 Gewerbearchiv (GewArch) 129, 130 (1999).Google Scholar

10 See COM (1989) 209 final (July 24, 1989).Google Scholar

11 See, e.g., Council Directive 06/42, 2006 O.J. (L 157) 24 (EC).Google Scholar

12 See, e.g., Council Directive 07/47, 2007 O.J. (L 247) 21 (EC).Google Scholar

13 Council Directive 06/95, 2006 O.J. (L 374) 10 (EC).Google Scholar

14 Counil Directive 94/25, 1994, O.J. (L 164) 15 (EC).Google Scholar

15 Council Directive 95/16, 1995 O.J. (L 213) 1 (EC).Google Scholar

16 See Kapoor, , supra note 5.Google Scholar

17 See Council Decision 768/08 of 9 July 2006, 2008 O.J. (L 218) 82.Google Scholar

18 See Council Regulation 765/08 of 9 July 2006, 2008 O.J. (L 218) 30 (EC).Google Scholar

19 See the Press Release from Mattel, available at http://www.mattel.de/service.php?action=topfaq&qid=1186040950&f.Google Scholar

20 See Council Directive 09/48, 2009 O.J. (L 170) 1 (EC) (Annex II, III, 11).Google Scholar

21 See id. at Annex II, III.Google Scholar

22 See id. at Annex II, I.Google Scholar

23 See id. at Annex II, V.Google Scholar

24 See id. at art. 17.Google Scholar

25 See Thomas Klindt, § 8, in GPSG Kommentar (Thomas Klindt ed., 1st ed. 2007), margin numbers 49–116; Thomas Wilrich, § 8, in GPSG (Thomas Wilrich ed., 1st ed. 2004), margin numbers 22–66; Joachim Geiß & Wolfgang Doll, § 8, in GPSG Kommentar (Joachim Geiß & Wolfgang Doll eds., 1st ed. 2005), margin numbers 50–71.Google Scholar

26 See Council Directive 09/48, art. 11, 2009 O.J. (L 170) 1 (EC).Google Scholar

27 See id. at Annex V, B, 1.Google Scholar

28 See id. at art. 4.Google Scholar

29 See id. at arts. 6, 7.Google Scholar

30 See Klindt, , supra note 24, at § 19, margin numbers 1, 25.Google Scholar

31 See id. at § 20, margin number 4.Google Scholar

32 See Press Statement by the Bundesminsterium für Risikobewertung BfR (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment) dated 29 December 2008, available at http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/27579; see also Süddeutsche Zeitung (South German Newspaper), no. 295, Dec. 19 2008, at 2.Google Scholar

33 Editorial office of the EuZW with reference to Joachim Wuermeling, Undersecretary of State at the Federal Ministry of Economics, 18 EuZW 654 (2007).Google Scholar

34 This was also the recommendation of the TÜV Rheinland (Rhineland technical inspection agency) dated 18 December 2008, available at http://www.tuv.com/de/news_spielzeugrichtlinie.html?lan=1.Google Scholar

35 See Geiß & Doll, , supra note 24, at § 7, margin number 4.Google Scholar