¹ ABl. C 92, 25.4.1975; ABl. C 133, 3.6.1981.Google Scholar

² Public Papers of the United States, John F. Kennedy, Containing the Public Messages, Speeches and Statements of the President, January 1 to December 31, 1962, 235-243.Google Scholar

³ Rarely, there has been performed an analysis of the politics of the Commission, yet cf. Joerges, Zielsetzungen und Instrumentarien der europäischen Verbraucherrechtspolitik: eine Analyse von Entwicklungen im Bereich des Zivilrechts, ZVP 1979, 213; Krämer, ZVP 1979, 228 and a commentary referring thereto by Joerges, ZVP 1980, 57.Google Scholar

⁴ First consumer programme (FN.2), 3.Google Scholar

⁵ ABl. L. 11, 15.1.2002, 4.Google Scholar

⁶ Micklitz, Social Justice in European Private Law, Yearbook of European Law 1999/2000, 167-204.Google Scholar

⁷ ABl. L. 210, 7.8.198, 29 changed through Directive 99/34 ABl. L 414, 4.6.1999, 20.Google Scholar

⁸ Reich, Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherschutz im Vertrag von Amsterdam, VuR 1999, 3 et seq.Google Scholar

⁹ Reich/Micklitz, Europäisches Verbraucherrecht, 4^th edition, to be published in 2003, §§ 28-30.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Tonner, Die Rolle des Verbraucherrechts bei der Entwicklung eines europäischen Zivilrechts, JZ 1996, 533.Google Scholar

¹¹ The notification of the European Commission and the European Parliament on the European contract law COM (2001) 398, final 11.7.2001 has raised a debate on a large scale on the future of European private law.Google Scholar

¹² Schieble, Deutsches und Europäisches Produktsicherheitsrecht, forthcoming in 2003.Google Scholar

¹³ Principles of European Contract Law, Part I and II, prepared by the Commission on European Contract Law, edited by Lando and Beale, 2000; Schulte-Noelke/Schulze in association with Bernardeau (ed.), Europäisches Vertragsrecht im Gemeinschaftsrecht, 2002.Google Scholar

¹⁴ The harmless sounding invitation to tender, A call for tender Markt/2002/11/D – Comparison of the national laws implementing Directive 85/374 on liability for defective products with other existing liability systems, contains in its main feature an important instrument of legal policy which the ECJ has raised in its rulings regarding Art. 13 of Directive 85/374.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Cf. Green Book on alternative dispute resolution regarding civil and commercial law (COM [2002] 196 final 19.4.2002).Google Scholar

¹⁶ The reform of the German law of obligations constitutes a classic example. Yet, in the ongoing discussion the dogmatic integration of the new law of obligations plays a predominant role, beyond the Europeanization that went along with the integration of consumer law.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Critical view Kötz, Abschied von der Rechtskreislehre, ZEuP 1998, 493.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Helpful Teubner, Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences, 61 (1998) Modern Law Review 11.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Osman (ed.), Vers un Code de la Consommation, 1998.Google Scholar

²⁰ Cf. Münch. Komm-Micklitz, introductory remarks §§ 13, 14 BGB.Google Scholar

²¹ Dahl Melchior/Tamm, (ed.) Danish law in a European Perspective, 2^nd edition, 2002.Google Scholar

²² Consumer legislation in the EC Countries, Reich/Micklitz, Verbraucherschutz in den EG-Staaten, 1979; Fontaine/Bourgoignie, Consumer legislation in Denmark, 1981; Calais-Auloy et. al., Consumer legislation in France, 1981; Reich/Micklitz, Consumer legislation in Germany, 1980; Ghidini, Consumer legislation in Italy, 1980; Hondius, Consumer legislation in the Netherlands, 1980; Whincup, Consumer legislation in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, 1980.Google Scholar

²³ Whincup, Consumer legislation in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, 1980.Google Scholar

²⁴ Calais-Auloy, Le Droit de la Consommation en France, 1981.Google Scholar

²⁵ Reich/Tonner/Wegner, Verbraucher und Recht, 1976.Google Scholar

²⁶ Scherpe, Außergerichtliche Streitbeilegung in Verbrauchersachen, 2002.Google Scholar

²⁷ Cf. Joerges (FN.3).Google Scholar

²⁸ Contrary Legrand, European Legal Systems are not converging, (1996) 45 International Law Quarterly (ICLQ), 52; same author, Against a European Civil Code, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review (MLR), 44.Google Scholar

²⁹ Münch. Komm-Micklitz, introductory remarks §§ 13, 14 BGB, MN. 28, 29.Google Scholar

³⁰ ABl. L 172, 31.12.1985, 31.Google Scholar

³¹ Thus Roth, Europäischer Verbraucherschutz und BGB, JZ 2001, 473 hit the bull's-eye with his criticism.Google Scholar

³² Europäisches Verbraucherrecht.Google Scholar

³³ ABl. L 158, 23.6.1990, 59.Google Scholar

³⁴ ABl. L 95, 21.4.1993, 29.Google Scholar

³⁵ ABl. L 280, 29.10.1994, 83.Google Scholar

³⁶ ABl. L. 144, 4.6.1997, 19.Google Scholar

³⁷ ABl. L 166, 11.6.1998, 51.Google Scholar

³⁸ ABl. L 171, 17.7.1999, 12.Google Scholar

³⁹ ABl. L 271, 9.10.2002, 16.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Bürgerrechte in der Europäischen Union, 1999, S. 263.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Rs. 186/87 Slg. 1989, 195.Google Scholar

⁴² Rs. C-240-244/98 Slg. 2000, I-4941.Google Scholar

⁴³ Rs. C-96/00 Slg. 2002, I-nnv, = EuZW 2002, 539, MN. 58.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Micklitz, Vertragschlussmodalitäten, in Micklitz/Pfeiffer/Tonner/Willingmann (eds.), Schuldrechtsreform und Verbraucherschutz, series of publications VIEW, Volume 9, 2001, 191 et seq.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ The notification of the Commission (FN 11) covers consumer contract directives as well as liability law.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Cf. the entire spectrum of all contributions in Schulte-Noelke/Schulze (FN 14).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ ABl. C 22, 29.1.1977, 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Rs. C-168/00 Leitner, Slg. 2002, I-nnv=EuZW 2002, 339.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Survey in Tonner, 10 Jahre EG-Pauschalreise-Richtlinie – eine Bilanz, EWS 2000, 473.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Reich, Die Vorlagepflicht auf teilharmonisierten Rechtsgebieten am Beispiel der Richtlinien zum Verbraucherschutz, RabelsZ 66 (2002), 531-552, speaks of a legal-political garage.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Green Book on consumer protection COM (2001) 531 final 2.10.2001 as well as follow-up measures to the Green book on consumer protection COM (2002) 289 final 11/6.2002.Google Scholar

⁵² European Commission, Notification to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Communities, Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, consumer-political strategy 2002-2006, 7.5.2002, COM (2002) 208 final.Google Scholar

⁵³ Rott/Butters, Öffentliche Versorgungsbedingungen und Vertragsgerechtigkeit im Lichte des Gemeinschaftsrechts, VuR 1999, 107.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Micklitz, Keβler, Europäisches Lauterkeitsrecht, GRUR Int. 2002, 885 et seq.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ DG Wettbewerb ABl. L 203, 1.8.2002,30.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Rs. C-453/99 Courage Slg. 2001, I-6297.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Micklitz/Monazzahian/Röβler, Door-Door-Selling – Pyramid Selling – Multilevel-Marketing, A Study commissioned by the European Commission, Volume I and II, November 1999, accessible on the website of DG SANCO.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Open call for Tender – Sanco/2002/B4/001 Comparative analysis of national liability systems for remedying damage caused by defective consumer services.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Green Book COM (2002) 196 final 19.4.2002Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Stuyck, Patterns of Justice in the Constitutional Charter: minimum harmonization in the field of consumer law, Liber Amicorum Reich, Law and diffuse Interests in the European Legal Order 1997, 279; Wilhelmsson, Is There a European Consumer Law – and Should There be one, Centro di studi e richerche di diritto comparato e straniero, (41) 2000.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Legrand, European Legal Systems are not converging, (1996) 45 International Law Quarterly (ICLQ), 52; same author, Against a European Civil Code, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review (MLR), 44.Google Scholar

⁶² Rs. 382/87 Buet, Slg. 1989, 1235; Rs. C-169/00 Leitner, Slg. 2002, I-nnv=EuZW 2002, 339.Google Scholar

⁶³ Consumer Policy Strategy (2002-2006), ABl. C 137, 8.6.2002, 2.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Proposal for a Directive on the Harmonization of consumer credit, COM (2002) 443 final, 11.9.2002.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Consequences on the Green Book on consumer protection, COM (2002) 289, final 11.6.2002.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Rs. 120/78 REWE Zentrale v. Monopolverwaltung für Branntwein, Slg. 1979, 649.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ The ECJ followed the restrictive reasoning of the Commission. Rs. C-52/00, Commission/France, Slg. 2002, I-nnv; Rs. C-154/00, Commission/Greece, Slg. 2002, I-nnv, Rs. C-183/00, Sánchez/Asturia, Slg. 2002, I-nnv=EuZW 2002, 574.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ The publishing of that project has been scheduled for the end of 2002.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Schwintowski, Vertragsschluss für Waren und Dienstleistungen in Europäischen Verbraucherrecht: Form und Inhaltsbindungen kontra Privatautonomie, EWS 2001-2008.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ The history of EC Directive 97/5 cross-boarder credit transactions ABl. L 43, 14.2.1997 can be used as an illustrative example.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Green Book COM (2002) 196, final 19.4.2002.Google Scholar

⁷² Now COM (2002) 278 final, 5.6.2002 Suivi du Livre blanc sur la gouvernance européenne – Pour un usage mieux adapté des instruments.Google Scholar

⁷³ ABl. C 136, 4.6.1985, 1.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ ABl. C. 3, 5.2.1999, 4 Art. 23 in connection with Art. 22(1).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Reich, Wie gesund ist der Gesundheitsschutz in der Gemeinschaft? Die Folgen des EuGH v. 5.10.2000 für das Gemeinschaftsrecht (forthcoming in the publication in honours of Gerd Winter 2003) sees the grounds in the failed combination of advertising ban and minimum harmonization.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Weatherill, Justifying Limits to Party Autonomy in the Internal Market – EC Legislation in the Field of Consumer Protection, in: Grundmann/Kerber/Weatherill (eds.), Party Autonomy and the Role of Information in the Internal Market, 2001, 173.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Rs. C-359/92, Slg. 1994, I-3681.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ So far there exists a working paper only.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Notwithstanding, see Lenz, Unlauterer Wettbewerb und freier Warenverkehr in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes, ZEuP 1994, 624; proving that the ECJ sporadically makes judgments.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Micklitz, The New German Sales Law – Changing Patterns on the Regulation of Product Quality, Journal of Consumer Policy, 2002, 379.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Rs. C-481/99, Heininger/Bayrische Hypo und Vereinsbank, Slg. 2001, I-9955.Google Scholar

⁸² ABl. L 78, 17.7.2000, 1.Google Scholar

⁸³ Verordnungen über die Gruppenfreistellung von vertikalen Vertriebsbindungen im Kfz-Sektor, Nr. 1400/2002 ABl. L 203, 1.8.2002, 30.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Bourgoignie, The Approximation Process of Consumer Law of Central and Eastern European Countries to EU Legislation: A Favourable Context but an Urgent Need for Clarification, in Micklitz (ed.) Rechtseinheit und Rechtsvielfalt in Europa, 1996, 91.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Micklitz, Verbraucherschutz West versus Ost – Kompatibilisierungsmöglichkeiten in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft – Einige Vorüberlegungen, in: Heiss (ed.) Brückenschlag zwischen den Rechtskulturen des Ostseeraums, Mohr Siebeck, 2001, 37.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Snyder, The Effectiveness of European Community Laws: Institutions, Processes, Tools, Techniques, MLR (56) 1993, 19.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ COM (2001) 428 final, 25.7.2001.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Osman (ed.), Vers un Code de la Consommation, 1998.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Micklitz/Pfeiffer/Tonner/Willingmann (eds.), Schuldrechtsreform und Verbraucherschutz, series of publications VIEW, volume 9, 2001.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Dahl/Melchior/Tamm (eds.) Danish law in a European Perspective, 2^nd edition, 2002.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Micklitz/Monazzahian/Röβler, Door-Door-Selling – Pyramid Selling – Multilevel-Marketing, A Study commissioned by the European Commission, Volume I and II, November 1999, accessible on the website of DG SANCO.Google Scholar

⁹² If at all, the ECJ would have to deal with the coherence of national social security law and European antitrust law.Google Scholar