1 Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument 565 (Reissue with a new Epilogue, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Carter, Paul, The Road to Botany Bay: An Exploration of Landscape and History 31 (1989).Google Scholar

3 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 562.Google Scholar

4 Orford, Anne, International Law and the South as a Legal Space, paper presented at the Of the South symposium, Griffith Law School, June 2006, on file with author.Google Scholar

5 Nesiah, Vasuki, Placing International Law: White Spaces on a Map, 16 Leiden Journal of International Law 1 (2003).Google Scholar

6 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 569.Google Scholar

7 Ibid, 616.Google Scholar

8 Ibid.Google Scholar

9 JC Beaglehole, The Life of Captain James Cook 15–98 (1974).Google Scholar

10 Ryan, Simon, The Cartographic Eye: How Explorers Saw Australia 40–42 (1996),.Google Scholar

11 Neill, Anna, British Discovery Literature and the Rise of Global Commerce 1 (2002).Google Scholar

12 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 564.Google Scholar

13 Ibid, 564.Google Scholar

14 Ibid, 565–6.Google Scholar

15 Ibid, 566.Google Scholar

16 Ibid, 567.Google Scholar

17 Ibid, 569.Google Scholar

18 Ibid, 571: ‘The politics of international law is what competent international lawyers do. And competence is the ability to use grammar in order to generate meanings by doing things in argument.’Google Scholar

19 Ibid, 568–9.Google Scholar

20 Ibid, 572.Google Scholar

21 Ibid, 573.Google Scholar

22 Koskenniemi, Martti, Letter to the Editors of the Symposium, 93 Am J Int'l L 351, 357 (1999). (‘To write a deconstructive memorandum for a permanent mission to the United Nations would be a professional and social mistake’ (357); ‘The distant and impersonal language of authority employed by the International Court of Justice stands in sharp contrast to the passionate advocacy of Amnesty International or Greenpeace. To mix up the contexts would be a professional mistake’ (360)).Google Scholar

23 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 575.Google Scholar

24 Ibid, 585.Google Scholar

25 Ibid, 569.Google Scholar

26 Ibid, 572.Google Scholar

27 Ibid, 572.Google Scholar

28 Ibid, 617.Google Scholar

29 Douzinas, Costas, Warrington, Ronnie and McVeigh, Shaun, Postmodern Jurisprudence: The Law of Text in the Texts of Law 144 (1993).Google Scholar

30 Fish, Stanley, Dennis Martinez and the Uses of Theory, 96 Yale Law Journal 1773, 1797 (1987).Google Scholar

31 Douzinas, , Warrington, and McVeigh, , supra note 29, 137.Google Scholar

32 Ibid, 138.Google Scholar

33 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 568–9.Google Scholar

34 Remarks of Martti Koskenniemi in Review Essay Symposium. Thinking Another World: “This Cannot Be How the World Was Meant to Be”, 16 European Journal of International Law 255, 292 (2005).Google Scholar

35 Ibid.Google Scholar

36 Koskenniemi, Martti, supra note 22, at 361.Google Scholar

37 See the transcript of the wide-ranging discussion on whether or not we are living in revolutionary times published as Roundtable – War, Force and Revolution, in Proceedings of the 100^TH Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (2006) (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Remarks of Philip Allott in Review Essay Symposium. Thinking Another World: “This Cannot Be How the World Was Meant to Be” 16 European Journal of International Law 255, 259 (2005)Google Scholar

39 For the notion that inheritance involves a choice, see Derrida, Jacques, Negotiations 110–11 (Elizabeth Rottenberg ed and trans, 2002).Google Scholar

40 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 566.Google Scholar

41 Ibid, 566–7.Google Scholar

42 Ibid, 567.Google Scholar

43 Ibid, 615–6.Google Scholar

44 Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civiliser of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 516 (2001).Google Scholar

45 Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future 196 (1977).Google Scholar

46 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 563.Google Scholar

47 Ibid, 568.Google Scholar

48 Ibid, 569.Google Scholar

49 Ibid, 617.Google Scholar

50 Neill, , supra note 11, at 2. Koskenniemi's twentieth century version of grammar does differ in important ways from the eighteenth century practice of botany as well as from eighteenth century grammar, particularly in terms of ‘the relation of representation to that which is posited in it’ (see Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences 238 (1970)). My interest here is in that which continues across the rupture, which according to Foucault marks the ‘entire visible surface of knowledge’ in the early nineteenth century (217). In particular, natural history and grammar both persist with the practice of analysing identity and difference through the positing of a system consisting of formal elements, producing ‘the continuous, yet articulated, table that was set up in the teeming profusion of similitudes, the clearly defined order among the empirical multiplicities’ (237).Google Scholar

51 Carter, , supra note 2, at 20.Google Scholar

52 Ibid, 21.Google Scholar

53 Foucault, , supra note 50, at 131.Google Scholar

54 Carter, , supra note 2, at 21.Google Scholar

55 On the crisis that the ‘discovery’ of the New World posed to Western thought and the influence of this crisis on international law, see generally Jennifer Beard, The Political Economy of Desire: International Law, Development and the Nation State (forthcoming 2006).Google Scholar

56 For the systemisation of legal techniques for responding to a conflict of norms or the relation between norm and exception, see Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, A/CN.4/L.682, 4 April 2006, and for the oscillation between sovereign and source-based arguments, see Koskenniemi, supra note 1, 573–589.Google Scholar

57 Carter, , supra note 2, at 20.Google Scholar

58 Ibid, 22.Google Scholar

59 Ibid, 22.Google Scholar

60 Man, Paul de, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust 6 (1979).Google Scholar

61 Ibid, 7.Google Scholar

62 Ibid, 8.Google Scholar

63 Warrington, Douzinas and McVeigh, , supra note 29, 140.Google Scholar

64 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, at 617.Google Scholar

65 Ibid, 590.Google Scholar

66 Ibid, 591.Google Scholar

67 Beaglehole, , supra note 9, 99–127.Google Scholar

68 Carter, , supra note 2, at 18.Google Scholar

69 Ibid, xxii.Google Scholar

70 Ibid, xxi.Google Scholar

71 Ibid, 4.Google Scholar

72 Ibid, xxii.Google Scholar

73 Ibid, 25.Google Scholar

74 Ibid, 7.Google Scholar

75 Ibid, 9.Google Scholar

76 Ibid, 9.Google Scholar

77 Ibid, 7.Google Scholar

78 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, at 604.Google Scholar

79 Koskenniemi, , supra note 34, at 282.Google Scholar

80 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, at 560.Google Scholar

81 Ibid, 564.Google Scholar

82 On this sense of the responsibility of the decision-maker, see further Orford, Anne, A Jurisprudence of the Limit, in International Law and its Others 1 (Anne Orford ed., 2006).Google Scholar

83 Carter, , supra note 2, at 26.Google Scholar

84 Cook, James, The Journals of Captain James Cook on his Voyages of Discovery Volume 1: The Voyage of the Endeavour, 1768–1771 501 (JC Beaglehole et al. eds., 1955), cited in Carter, supra note 2, at 25.Google Scholar

85 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 615.Google Scholar

86 Ibid, 616.Google Scholar

87 Koskenniemi, Martti, Constitutionalism as a Mindset: Reflections on Kantian themes about international law and globalisation, Tel Aviv, 28–30 December 2005, paper available at http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/blogs/eci/Tel%20Aviv%20uusi%2005a[1].pdf Google Scholar

88 Cook, James, The Journals 199 (2003).Google Scholar

89 Koskenniemi, , supra note 1, 563.Google Scholar

90 Ibid, 615.Google Scholar

91 Ibid, 573.Google Scholar

92 Ibid, 507.Google Scholar

93 Winterson, Jeanette, Sexing the Cherry 81 (1990).Google Scholar