Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T00:22:05.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the European Commission Have Too Much Power Enforcing European Competition Law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Milana S. Karayanidi

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The article critically assesses the role of the Directorate General of the European Commission in executing enforcement of the European Communities Competition Law. The Commission is granted equally unprecedented legal powers to carry out the functions of policy maker, investigator, “judge”, “jury”, and “executioner”. For some, it is accordingly difficult to resist the suggestion that the focus of so many regulatory roles and so much power in the hands of one organization represents a legitimate source of concern. By comparing the European system of antitrust enforcement with that of the United States and examining the historical evolvement of the Commission's role, the article determines whether focus of so much power in the hands of the European Commission forms a legitimate source of concern. It determines whether so much power given to the Commission may interfere with the basic rights of corporate undertakings to carry out their business operations, and how the powers granted to the Commission lead to legally based reasons for anxiety.

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 7 , 01 July 2011 , pp. 1446 - 1459
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Montesquieu, Charles de, L'esprit des lois (The Spirit of the Laws) (1748).Google Scholar

2 By the “European Commission” (EC) we shall mean the Directorate General of the European Commission responsible for competition policy implementation in the European Union (EU).Google Scholar

3 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2008 O.J. (C115) 47 [hereinafter “TFEU”].Google Scholar

4 Council Regulation 17, 1962 O.J. (13) 204-211 [hereinafter “Regulation 17”].Google Scholar

5 Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 [hereinafter “Regulation 1/2003”] on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the European Community Treaty, 2003 O.J. (L1) 1.Google Scholar

6 Case T-457/08 R, Intel v. European Commission, 2009 E.C.R. II-12.Google Scholar

7 Fines imposed (not adjusted for Court judgments) period 2007-2011, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/statistics/statistics.pdf (last accessed: 23 June 2011).Google Scholar

8 Case IV/M.1543, Sanofi/Synthélabo, EC Decision 2000/291/EC, 1999 O.J. (L95) 34.Google Scholar

9 Council Regulation 4064/89 of 30 December 1989 on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings, 1989 O.J. (L395) 1 as amended by Council Regulation 1310/97, 1990 O.J. (L257) 1.Google Scholar

10 Case COMP/M.2220, General Electric/Honeywell, EC Decision 2001/C 74/04, 2001 O.J. (C74) 6.Google Scholar

11 Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, 2002 O.J. (L108) 33 on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (hereinafter “Framework Directive”).Google Scholar

12 See Case EL/2008/0754, SG-Greffe D/201150 (2008).Google Scholar

13 See the special edition of the following newsletter: European Commission, Ensuring fair play, Competition Policy Newsletter 1, 3 (2008).Google Scholar

14 Case 155/79, Australian Mining & Smelting Europe v. European Commission, 1982 E.C.R. 1575.Google Scholar

15 Council Regulation 773/2004, 2004 O.J. (L123) 18 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the EC pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the European Community Treaty, supra note 5.Google Scholar

16 Müller, Felix, The New Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition (II/II), 5 German Law Journal 721, 737 (2004).Google Scholar

17 See Regulation 17, supra note 4, art. 14.Google Scholar

18 Gippini-Fournier, Eric, Community Report FIDE 2008, Social Science Research Network (SSRN) 1, 59, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1139776 (last accessed: 23 June 2011.)Google Scholar

19 See Regulation 1/2003, supra note 5, art. 22.Google Scholar

20 The way the EC exercises this power is set out in the European Council Notice 2004/C 101/04, 2004 O.J. (C 101) 54 on the co-operation between the EC and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 of the European Community Treaty, supra note 5.Google Scholar

21 EC Notice of 12 February 2002 on Immunity from Fines and Reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases, 2002 O.J. (C45) 3-5.Google Scholar

22 Case COMP/38710, Bitumen Spain, Summary of Commission Decision 2009/C 321/ 08, 2007 O.J. (C 321) 15-17.Google Scholar

23 Hawk, Barry & Laudati, Laraine, Antitrust Federalism in the United States and Decentralization of Competition Law Enforcement in the European Union: a Comparison, 20 Fordham International Law Journal 18, 24 (1996).Google Scholar

24 US Code, Title 15 s. 45, art. a(2)(2007).Google Scholar

25 See Hawk & Laudati, supra note 23, at 26.Google Scholar

26 Valls, Raquel, Origine et évolution du Conseil de l'Europe (Origin and Development of the Council of Europe), European NAvigator, available at: http://www.ena.lu/origine_evolution_conseil_europe-01-13962 (last accessed: 23 June 2011.)Google Scholar

27 Gerber, David, The Transformation of European Community Competition Law?, 35 Harvard International Law Journal 98, 105-6 (1994), citing Ian Forrester & Christopher Norall, The Laicization of Community Laws: Self-Help and the Rule of Reason: How Competition Law Is and Could Be Applied, 21 Common Marketing Law Review 11, 13 (1984).Google Scholar

28 Sufrin, Brenda & Jones, Alison, EC Competition Law 206 (2008).Google Scholar

29 See Gippini-Fournier, supra note 18, at 124.Google Scholar

30 See Regulation 1/2003, art. 5.Google Scholar

31 See Gippini-Fournier, supra note 18, at 102.Google Scholar

32 Riley, Alan, EC Antitrust Modernization: The European Commission does very nicely – thank you! Part 1: Regulation 1 and the notification burden, 24 European Competition Law Review 604 (2003).Google Scholar

33 Christiansen, Thomas, Tensions of European Governance: Politicized Bureaucracy and Multiple Accountability of the European Commission, 4 Journal of European Public Policy 73 (1997).Google Scholar

34 Gerber, David, Modernizing European Competition law: A Developmental Perspective, 22 European Competition Law Review 121, 125 (2001).Google Scholar

35 See Hawk, & Laudati, , supra note 23, at 31.Google Scholar

36 Commission of the European Communities, Annex to the Report from the Commission: Report on Competition Policy 2007 (final) 368 COM (2008).Google Scholar

37 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

38 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

39 Id. at 22.Google Scholar

40 See Hawk, & Laudati, , supra note 23, at 36.Google Scholar