Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:17:53.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensions of Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Patricia Mindus

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Maastricht Treaty (the “Treaty”) first introduced the status of EU citizenship. The twentieth anniversary of the signing of the Treaty, marked in 2013, was declared the European Year of the Citizen. Union citizenship has been understood as the world's first post-national citizenship, although it is still complementary to national citizenships. EU citizens enjoy rights that have been expanded, modified, and reinterpreted in light of the EU integration process. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been a driving force in this process. This twentieth anniversary has provided the occasio for this special issue. Indeed, much has happened over the last two decades. The Maastricht Treaty entered into force on the heels of German reunification, and afterwards, a series of EU treaties followed: The Amsterdam Treaty, the Nice Charter of Fundamental Rights, the aborted constitutionalization process and the Rome Treaty in 2004, and the Treaty of Lisbon. The Euro took over former national currencies in 2002; the enlargement process led to today's twenty-eight Member States. But the ratio of this special issue is based on other events as linked to the 2008 financial crisis, bailouts, the fiscal compact, and similar measures. In a nutshell, the timeliness of this volume is linked to the current financial disarray. Since prognosis presupposes diagnosis, no further words are necessary as to the importance of this task. It is (almost) self-evident that before taking action and preparing for the future, one needs to address the very first question: Nosce te ipsum or know thyself. Union citizens need to take a step back and ask what they need to be and who they want to become.

Type
Special Issue EU Citizenship: Twenty Years On
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 15 , Issue 5: Special Issue EU Citizenship: Twenty Years On , 01 August 2014 , pp. 735 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BverfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvE 2/08, para. 252 (June 30, 2009), http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208en.html.Google Scholar

2 I am grateful to the Department of Philosophy and the Faculty of History and Philosophy at Uppsala University for hosting the conference and to the Stockholm Law School and Uppsala Faculty of Law for co-organizing it; as well as to Vetenskapsrådet, Edward Cassel and Wenner-Gren Foundations, the Swedish Network for Research in EU Law, and the Uppsala Forum on Peace, Democracy and Justice for sponsoring the conference. My gratitude also goes to Sverker Gustafson and Anna Cornell Jonsson for chairing the conference, and to Ulf Bernitz (Stockholm), Adrian Favell (Sciences-Po), Kees Groenendijk (Nijmegen), and Dora Kostakopoulou (Warwick) for their participation. All the conference presentations can be viewed at: http://media.medfarm.uu.se/play/kanal/121. Medfarm Play, Uppsala Universitet, http://media.medfarm.uu.se/play/kanal/121 (last visited July 22, 2014).Google Scholar

3 Brecht, Bertolt, Flüchtlingsgespräche 7 (1998).Google Scholar

4 Bauböck, Rainer, Citizenship and National Identities in the European Union, in Integration durch Demokratie. Neue Impulse für die europäische Union 302–20 (Eugen Antalosvky, Josef Melchior & Sonja Puntscher-Riekmann eds., 1997).Google Scholar

5 Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (1945).Google Scholar

6 Bodin, Jean, Les Six livres de la République 68 (Scientia Verlag 1977) (1583); Patricia Mindus, Cittadini e non. Cittadini e no. Forme e funzioni dell‘inclusione e dell‘esclusione (2014).Google Scholar

7 Bacon, Francis, Argument in the Case of the Post-Nati of Scotland (1608); Harvey Wheeler, Comments, Calvin's Case and the Empire (1947); Polly J. Price, Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin's Case (1608), 9 Yale J.L. & Human. 73, 73–129 (1997); Michelle Everson, Subjects or Citizens of Erewhon?, 7 Citizenship stud. 57, 65–83 (2003); Elizabeth F. Cohen, Jus Tempus in the Magna Carta: The Sovereignty of Time in Modern Politics and Citizenship, 43 Pol. Sci. & Pol. 463 (2010).Google Scholar

8 Nottebohm Case (Liech. v. Guat.), 1955 I.C.J. 4 (April 6); Suzanne Bastide, Comment, L'affaire Nottebohm devant la Cour Internationale de Justice, 45 Revue critique de droit international privé 607 (1956); J.H. Glazer, Affaire Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), A Critique, 44 Geo. L.J. 313 (1955); Jacques Maury, L'arrêt Nottebohm et la condition de nationalité effective, 23 Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 515 (1958); Paul Weis, Nationality and Statelessness in International Law 176–81, 318–21 (1979).Google Scholar

9 Marshall, Thomas H., Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays (1950). See also Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T.H. Marshall (Martin Bulmer & Anthony M. Rees eds., 1996).Google Scholar

10 Park, Robert E., Human Migration and the Marginal Man, 33 Am. J. of Soc. 881 (1928); Gino Germani, El concepto de marginalidad: Significado, raíces históricas y teóricas, con particolar referencia a la marginalidad urbana 66 (1973).Google Scholar

11 Bayern, Rottmann v., CJEU Case C-135/08, 2010 E.C.R. I-1449.Google Scholar

12 Baden-Württemberg v. Tsakouridis, CJEU Case C-145/09, 2010 E.C.R. I-1345.Google Scholar

13 Micheletti v. Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria, CJEU Case C-369/90, 1992 E.C.R. I-4239.Google Scholar

14 The Queen v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, ex parte Kaur, CJEU Case C-192/99, 2001 E.C.R. I-1237.Google Scholar

15 Zhu v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, CJEU Case C-200/02, 2004 E.C.R. I-9925.Google Scholar

16 Eman v. College van Burgemeester, CJEU Case C-300/04, 2006 E.C.R. I-08055.Google Scholar

17 Rottmann, CJEU Case C-135/08.Google Scholar

18 Marshall, , supra note 9.Google Scholar

19 Azoulai, Loïc, La citoyennete europeenne, un statut d'integration sociale, in Chemins d'Europe : Melanges en l'honneur de Jean PAUL JACQUE 1-28 (2010).Google Scholar

20 Foucault, Michel, Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–79 (2008).Google Scholar

21 Compare id. with Michelle Everson, The Fault of (European) Law in (Political and Social) Economic Crisis, 24 L. & Critique 22 (2013).Google Scholar

22 Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944).Google Scholar

23 Schmitt, Carl, Der Hüter der Verfassung (1931).Google Scholar

24 Aristotle, , Politics Book III § 1274b, 33–42 (H. Rackham trans., Harvard Univ. Press 1944).Google Scholar