(1) Weiler, J. H.H. The Constitutional of Europe, Cambridge: CUP, 1999, 223.Google Scholar

(2) Proclaimed during the IGC in Nice on December 7, 2000, Official Journal of the EC, Dec 18, 2000, C 364701, http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/unit/charte/pdf/texte_en.pdf.Google Scholar

(3) Schmitter, Philippe, An Excursus on Constitutionalization, Constitutionalism, Webpaper, ConWEB 3/2000, 2 ff, http://www.qub.ac.uk/ies/onlinepapers/const.html.Google Scholar

(4) See, March, James G. and Olson, Johan P., The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders, 52 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 943, 954 ff. (1998).Google Scholar

(5) Id., at 957.Google Scholar

(6) Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union, 34 JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES 53 (1996) (And the plentiful citations that followed).Google Scholar

(7) Bös, Mathias and Wiener, Antje, Borders of Global Politics: The Perspective of Citizenship,14 (1997) (Unpublished manuscript prepared for presentation at the International Studies Association convention, 19–22 March 1997, Toronto, Canada – on file with the authors Heidelberg/Sussex/Hanover).Google Scholar

(8) See, Shaw, Jo and Wiener, Antje, The Paradox of the \\\‘European\\\‘ Polity 10/99 Harvard Jean Monnet Working Papers (1999) at http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/99/991001.html; Zürn, Michael, Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions 6 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONs 183–221 (2000).Google Scholar

(9) See, e.g., Albert, Mathias, Brock, Lothar and Wolf, Klaus Dieter eds., CIVILIZING WORLD SOCIETY. (2000); Joerges, Christian and Sand, Inger-Johanne, CONSTITUTIONALISM AND TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE (2001), http://www.iue.it/LAW/joerges/transnationalism/project.htm.Google Scholar

(10) See, e.g., Scott, Joanne, On Kith and Kine (and Crustaceans): Trade and Environment in the EU and WTO, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/99/990301.html.Google Scholar

(11) Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht Heidelberg Tätigkeitsbericht für das Jahr 2000 http://www.virtual-institute.de/en/Taet2000/etat00_78.cfm.Google Scholar

(12) Weiler, supra note 1.Google Scholar

(13) See (14) Pernice, Ingolf, Die Notwendigkeit institutioneller Reformen. Aussichten für die Regierungskonferenz 55 INTERNATIONALE POLITIK 11, 15 (2000).Google Scholar

(15) See, McKenna, 1995, p. xv.Google Scholar

(16) For a process-oriented approach to EU constitutionalization, see, Walker, Neil, The White Paper in Constitutional Context, Symposium on the Commission\\\'s White Paper (Joerges, Ch., Y. Meny and J.H.H. Weiler eds., 2001) http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/011001.html.Google Scholar

(17) March and Olson, at 954.Google Scholar

(18) Weber, Albrecht, Grundrechte in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten im Vergleich, in CHARTA DER GRUNDRECHTE DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION 13 (Bremische Bürgerschaft ed. 2000) (This and all following translations from German original texts by the author).Google Scholar

(19) Weiler, at 221.Google Scholar

(20) Stone 1995, 1, RSC Working Paper, c.f. Weiler 1999, 221.Google Scholar

(21) See, for example, Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Chayes, Abram and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1995. The New Sovereignty. Compliance with International Regulatory Regimes. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. Why do Nations Obey International Law? Review Essay. The Yale Law Journals 106: 2599–2659.Zürn, M. and D. Wolf. 1999. European law and international regimes: the features of law beyond the nation state. European Law Journal 5, no. 3: 272–292.Google Scholar

(22) Finnemore, Martha. 2000. Are Legal Norms Distinctive? Journal of International Law & Politics 32: 699–705. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Norms Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55, no. 3: 553–588. Risse, Thomas. 2000. \\\'Let\\\'s Argue!\\\': Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54, no. 1: 1–39.Google Scholar

(23) See Goldstein, Kahler, Keohane and Slaughter, Eds. Legalization in World Politics, International Organization 54, 3 (Special Issue) 2000, for a critical evaluation see Finnemore, Martha and Stephen J. Toope. 2001. Alternatives to \\\‘Legalization\\\‘: Richer Views of Law and Politics. International Organization 55, no. 3: 743–758.Google Scholar

(24) Defining the concept of constitutionalization is subject to different views among scholars. As Deborah Cass writes with a view to its application in world trade disputes \\\“(W)hat is immediately striking… is the ambiguity of the term. Some scholars use it to mean the establishment of a set of institutions, rules and practices to administer, implement and operate the multilateral trading system. Others include within the term not only institutions, rules and practices, but also, importantly, rights, including a right to trade, which ultimately could be relied upon by individuals within states. Still others read constitutionalization (in other supranational trading contexts) to include a kind of ‘spirit\\\‘ without which there can be no durable social contract within the emergent constitutional community.\\\” See: Cass 2001 op. cit. at page: http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol12/No1/art1-01.html#TopOfPage Google Scholar

(25) The Irish Times, Thursday 1 November 2001, \\\“Survey founds Irish \\\‘more confused\\\‘ about EU\\\”, Mark Hennessy, http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2001/1101/hom19.htm.Google Scholar

(26) Presidency Conclusions, Cologne European Council 3–4 June 1999, http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/unit/charte/en/mandates.html (emphasis added).Google Scholar

(27) European Council Decision on drawing up of a Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (emphasis added, AW) Google Scholar

(28) Commission Communication on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, COM(2000) 559 final, Brussels 13 September 2000, http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/unit/charte/pdf/com2000-559_en.pdf.Google Scholar

(29) Commission Communication on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, COM(2000) 644 final, Brussels 11 October 2000, http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/unit/charte/pdf/com2000-644_en.pdf.Google Scholar

(30) http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/unit/charte/en/communications.html.Google Scholar

(31) COM(2000) 644 final, Brussels 11 October 2000, p. 2.Google Scholar

(32) See: Wiener, Antje. 2001. Zur Verfassungspolitik jenseits des Staates: Die Vermittlung von Bedeutung am Beispiel der Unionsbürgerschaft. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8, no. 1: 73–104. Williamson, Andrew. 2000. Enlargement of the Union and human rights conditionality: a policy of distinction? European Law Review 25: 601–617. Witte, Bruno de. 1998. Ethnic Minorities, the European Union and its Enlargement. In Reflection Group on \\\‘Long-Termn Implications of EU Enlargement: The Nature of the New Border\\\‘. European University Institute, Florence. Wiener, Antje and Theresa Wobbe, 2001, Norm Resonance in the Process of Eastern Enlargement, unpubl. Ms Belfast/Erfurt. Schwellnus, Guido. 2001. Much ado about nothing? Minority Protection and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, ECPR Meetings, 6–10 September 2001, Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar

(33) For a brilliant elaboration of a sceptical position about such symbolic rights policy see Haltern, Ulrich, 2001, Europe Goes Camper, Constitutionalism Webpapers ConWEB No. 3/2001, http://www.qub.ac.uk/ies/onlinepapers/const.html.Google Scholar

(34) Eriksson, , 2001, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/011201-10.html#TopOfPage, see also: Pernice, Ingolf. 1999. Vertragsrevision oder Europäische Verfassungsgebung? Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Rubrik \\\‘Die Gegenwart\\\‘, 7. Juli 1999, S. 7. Also, verbal intervention at the workshop on European Governance, Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin 14 October 2001.Google Scholar

(35) The Charter has no legal standing, and most of the included rights have long been integrated in the various European polities. The rights proclaimed in the Charter are legally protected by national constitutions of each member state, by the European Convention of Human Rights, by the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and, indeed, by the Treaty of European Union (TEU).Google Scholar

(36) See various suggestions for conceptual distinctions of this model as \\\“multi-level constitutionalism\\\” Pernice, Ingolf. 1999. Vertragsrevision oder Europäische Verfassungsgebung? Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Rubrik \\\‘Die Gegenwart\\\‘, 7. Juli 1999, S. 7. Bogdandy, Armin von. 1999. The Legal Case for Unity: The European Union as a Single Organization with a Single Legal System. Common Market Law Review 36, no. 5: 887–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(37) For a discussion of \\\‘good\\\‘ governance, see in particular Kohler-Koch, Beate. 1998. Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 29, no. special issue. Jachtenfuchs, Markus. 1997. Democracy and Governance in the European Union. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), http://eiop. or. at/eiop/texte/1997-002a.htm 1, no. 002. Kohler-Koch, Beate. 1999. Europe in Search of Legitimate Governance. ARENA Working Papers WP 99/27. Zürn, Michael. 2000. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations 6, no. 2: 183–221.Google Scholar

(38) Wiener 2001, op. cit. p. 74.Google Scholar