Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T03:37:59.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VI.—Geology and Petrology of the Intrusions of the Kilsyth-Croy District, Dumbartonshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. W. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
Glasgow University.

Extract

The general appearance of this rock in thin section is of an interlocking framework of plagioclase, augite, and iron-ores, with micropegmatite occupying the interstices. The mutual relations of the felspar and augite vary considerably. The felspar may be entirely enclosed in the augite. In this case it is very basic and only faintly zoned. The most common relation is for the augite to enclose the terminations of the felspar laths, the sub-ophitic structure of Watts. But frequently idiomorphic crystals of augite are found partly or wholly enclosed in felspar. The latter is then more acid than the ophitic felspar, and is broadly zoned. These varying relations may frequently be found within the limits of a single slide.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 359 note 1 Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, vol. i, p. 417.Google Scholar

page 360 note 1 Teall, , Brit. Petrog., 1888, p. 401.Google Scholar

page 360 note 2 Holland, Q.J.G.S., 1897, vol. liii, pp. 412–14.Google Scholar

page 361 note 1 Teall, , Q.J.G.S., 1884, vol. xl, p. 654.Google Scholar

page 361 note 2 Falconer, , T.R.S.E., 19051906, vol. xlv, pt. i, p. 147.Google Scholar

page 361 note 3 Elsden, , Q.J.G.S., 1908, vol. lxiv, p. 281.Google Scholar

page 362 note 1 Quant. Class, of Igneous Rocks, 1903, p. 186 et seq.

page 362 note 2 Op. cit., p. 28.

page 363 note 1 Op. cit., p. 28.

page 363 note 2 Q.J.G.S., 1894, vol. i, p. 311.Google Scholar

page 363 note 3 Trans. Royal Irish Acad., 1894, vol. xxx, pp. 477512.Google Scholar

page 363 note 4 Op. cit., p. 28.

page 363 note 5 “Report on Geol. of Rainy Lake Region”: Ann. Rep. Geol. Survey Canada, 1887–8, pt. i, pp. 147–50.

page 363 note 6 Q.J.G.S., 1908, vol. lxiv, p. 273.Google Scholar

page 364 note 1 Harrison, Perkins, , Rep. on Geol. of Essequibo and Potaro Rivers, Georgetown. 1900, p. 35Google Scholar. Also Harrison, , Geol. of the Goldfields of British Guiana, 1908.Google Scholar

page 364 note 2 Ferrar, , Nat. Antarctic Exp., 1907, vol. i, “Geology,” p. 50.Google Scholar

page 364 note 3 Hawes, , Amer. Journ. Science. (3), 1875, vol. ix, p. 186.Google Scholar

page 364 note 4 Harrison, Perkins, , Rep. on Geol. of Essequibo and Potaro Rivers, 1900, p. 64.Google Scholar

page 364 note 5 Prior, , Nat. Antarctic Exp., 1907, vol. i, p. 137.Google Scholar

page 364 note 6 Holland, Q.J.G.S., 1897, vol. liii, p. 409.Google Scholar

page 365 note 1 See Jensen, H. I., “Distribution, Origin, and Relationships of Alkaline Rocks”: Proc. Linn. Soc., N.S.W., 1908, vol. xxxiii, p. 491.Google Scholar

page 365 note 2 Amer. Journ. Sci. (4), 1903, vol. xv, p. 269Google Scholar; (4), 1906, vol. xxii, p. 195; (4), 1908, vol. xxvi, p. 17. Also Secondary Origin of certain Granites”: A.J.S. (4), vol. xx, p. 185.Google Scholar