No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transgressive Upper Eocene in Palestine
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
Several years ago I wrote a number of papers on the results of my investigations in a synclinal area near Megiddo, south-east of Mount Carmel, which I called “ the syncline of Megiddo ”. In the thick Eocene series of this syncline two distinct horizons of Lower and Upper Lutetian have been recognized. Above the Lutetian beds some patches of transgressive Upper Oligocene are preserved. Unfortunately the publications were based on investigations of only the north-eastern border of the whole synclinal region, further field explorations having been made impossible by the riots in 1936−39. In the summer of 1942 I renewed my fieldwork, which has led to a discovery of an Upper Eocene transgression over a probable Middle Eocene series.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943
References
REFERENCES
Avnimelech, M., 1936. études géologiques dans la région de la Shéphélah en Palestine. Grenoble, 124–134.Google Scholar
Avnimelech, M., 1939. On the geology and morphology of the Megiddo area. Journ. Palestine Orient. Soc., xix, 18–37.Google Scholar
Avnimelech, M., 1939. Les relations entre le volcanisme et la tectonique dans la région synclinale de Megiddo en Palestine. Ecl. Geol. Helv., xxxii, No. 1 33–37.Google Scholar
Avnimelech, M., Doncieux, L., and Picard, L., 1936. Sur la découverte d'une série nummulitique au SE du Mont Carmel en Palestine. C. r. Soc. Géol. France, 41–3.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, M., 1890. Das Eocan in Syrien. Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Gesellsch., xlii.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, M., 1931. Geologie Palastinas nach heutiger Auffassung. Zeitschr. deutsch. Palästina Ver., liv.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, M., 1935. über die Faunen der syrischen Kreide, des Eocans und Oligocns. Centralbl, f. Min. etc., B, No. 5, 148–161.Google Scholar
Brönnimann, P., 1938. über mikrospharische Asterocyclinen aus NW Marokko. Ecl. Geol. Helv., xxxi, No. 2, 303–310.Google Scholar
Cizancourt, Mme. de, 1934. Materiaux pour la stratigraphie du Nummulitique dans le desert de Syrie. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 5-e sér., iv, 737–758.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., 1934. On the occurrence of the marine Oligocene in Palestine. Geol. Mag., lxxi, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1922. Révision des Orbitoïdes. Deuxiéme partie: Orbitoides du Danien et de l'éiocene. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, IV-e sér., xxii, 55–100.Google Scholar
Dubertret, R., Doncieux, L., and Dubertret, L., 1938. Sur le Nummulitique du Koseir, au Sud d' Antiochia (Syrie). C. r. Ac. Sc. Paris, ccvi, 1224–1226.Google Scholar
Dubertret, R., Doncieux, L., Vautrin, H., and Dubertret, L., 1938. Sure le Nummulitique duversant oriental de l'Anti-Liban (region du Damas Syrie). C. r. Ac. Sc. Paris, ccvii, 1230–1232.Google Scholar
Henson, F. R. S., 1937. Larger Foraminifera from Aintab, Turkish Syria. Ecl. Geol. Helv., xxx, No. 1, 45–57.Google Scholar
Henson, F. R. S., 1938. Stratigraphical Correlation by small Foraminifera in Palestine and adjoining countries. Geol. Mag., lxxv, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, L. and Solomonica, P., 1936. On the geology of the Gaza-Beersheba District. Journ. Palestine Orient. Soc., xvi, 180–223.Google Scholar
Picard, L. and Doncieux, L., 1937. Sur la présence de l'éiocene supérieur—Oligoc'ne inferieur avec Nummulites incrassatus de la Harpe en Palestine. C. r. Soc. Géol. France, 62–3.Google Scholar
Senn, A., 1935. Die stratigraphische Verbreitung der tertiären Orbitoiden, mit spezieller Berücksichtigung ihres Vorkommens in Nord-Venezuela und Nord-Marokko. Ecl. Geol. Helv., xxviii, No 1, 51–113 and 369–373.Google Scholar