Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:59:32.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Problems of Physical Geology and the Earth's Thermal History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Arthur Holmes
Arthur Holmes
Affiliation:
The University, Durham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper I stated that the hypothesis of a continuously cooling earth had “consistently failed to lead to any adequate explanations of fissure eruptions and other volcanic and tension phenomena, mountain-building processes and their distribution in time and space, and the alternation of marine transgressions and recessions”. It seems to be desirable that I should further justify this sweeping integration of objections, for Dr. Harold Jeffreys, who has actively explored the consequences of this theory during recent years, takes exception to my discouraging view of the position, and claims that the alleged failures include the principal successes of the theory. The evidence on which my summary indictment was based will be reviewed in this paper; and attention will be directed to certain other phenomena—such as the growth of geosynclines—of which the significance has not yet been generally realized. As a preliminary it will be convenient to discuss the gradually converging evidence bearing on the thickness and substructure of the continents.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 64 , Issue 6 , June 1927 , pp. 263 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 Geol. Mag., 07, 1926, pp. 306–7.Google Scholar

page 263 note 2 The Earth, Cambridge, 1924.Google Scholar

page 264 note 1 Geol. Mag., 11, 1926, p. 517.Google Scholar

page 264 note 2 Geol. Mag., 07, 1926, p. 311.Google Scholar Homes, A. and Lawson, R. W., Phil. Mag., 12, 1926, p. 1227.Google Scholar

page 264 note 3 Geol. Mag., 07, 1926, pp. 317–18.Google Scholar

page 264 note 4 Q.J.G.S., lxxxii, 1926, p. lx.Google Scholar

page 265 note 1 The Observatory, 02, 1926, p. 57.Google Scholar

page 265 note 2 Phil. Mag., 12, 1926, p. 1226.Google Scholar Nature, 19th 02, 1927, and 14th May, 1927.Google Scholar

page 265 note 3 Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. xv (2), 1926. p. 167.Google Scholar

page 266 note 1 M. N. Roy. Ast. Soc. Geophys. Suppl., vol. i, No. 6, 1925, p. 282.Google Scholar

page 266 note 2 Nature, 25th 09, 1926, p. 443.Google Scholar Geol. Mag., 11, 1926, p. 523.Google Scholar M. N. Roy. Ast. Soc. Geophys. Suppl., vol. i, No. 8, 1926, p. 385.Google Scholar

page 266 note 3 Nature, 23rd 10, 1926, p. 586.Google Scholar

page 266 note 4 Our Mobile Earth, 1926, p. 100.Google Scholar

page 267 note 1 Schuchert, C., Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., xxxiv, 1923, p. 191.Google Scholar

page 267 note 2 Daly, R. A., Geol. Surv. Canada, Mem. 38, 1921, p. 173.Google Scholar

page 267 note 3 The plus and minus signs indicate the direction of possible corrections.

page 268 note 1 Jeffreys, H., The Earth, 1924, p. 140.Google Scholar

page 270 note 1 Daly, R. A., Igneous Rocks and their Origin, 1914, p. 186.Google Scholar

page 270 note 2 A process of this type might explain the remarkable depressed region that lies across Greenland in apparent continuation with the Icelandic Ridge. See Koch, L., Journ. Geol., 1923, pp. 28 and 59.Google Scholar

page 271 note 1 Keith, A., Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., vol. xxxiv, 1923, p. 372.Google Scholar

page 271 note 2 Bull. Nat. Research Council, U.S.A., No. 46, 1924, p. 19.Google Scholar

page 272 note 1 Day, A. L., Journ. Franklin Inst., 08, 1925, p. 161 (Centenary Address).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Day, A. L. and Allen, E. T., Carn. Inst. Wash. Pub., No. 360, 1925 (Lassen Peak).Google Scholar Morey, G. W., Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci., xii, 1922, p. 219.Google Scholar

page 274 note 1 The Earth, 1924, pp. 135–6.Google Scholar

page 275 note 1 For a summary of recent data see Holmes, A., The Age of the Earth, Benn's Sixpenny Library, No. 102, 1927Google Scholar; and Holmes, A. and Lawson, R. W., Am. Journ. Sci., 04, 1927, p. 339.Google Scholar

page 275 note 2 Leith, C. K., Structural Geology, 1923, pp. 195–9.Google Scholar

page 276 note 1 Geol. Mag., 07, 1926, p. 306.Google Scholar

page 276 note 2 For a spectacular series of proofs of this statement see Sederholm, J. J., Bull. Com. Geol. Finlande, No. 77, 1926.Google Scholar

page 277 note 1 For recent discussions see Wells, A. K., Geol. Mag., 1923, p. 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eskola, P., Fennia, vol. xlv, No. 19, 1925, p. 78Google Scholar; Benson, W. N., Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 19, No. 1, 1926.Google Scholar

page 277 note 2 Holmes, A., Geol. Mag., 07, 1926, p. 315.Google Scholar