Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:00:40.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Work on the Phacopidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. R. Cowper Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the publication of the paper by the present author in 1905 on the Classification of the Phacopidae, a considerable advance has been made in our knowledge of this family as a result of further and better material being obtained, and of new discoveries in different parts of the world. Many new genera and subgenera have been instituted, and modifications or limitations of some of the old terms have been introduced by various authors. The work of Wedekind, Clarke, Rud. and E. Richter, and Kozlowski has specially dealt with questions of classification, but there is still a considerable amount of diversity in the usage and application of the generic and subgeneric names.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 64 , Issue 7 , July 1927 , pp. 308 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1906. Reed, , Lower Palaeoz. Trilobites of Girvan (Palaeont. Soc.), pt. iii, pp. 154–60, pls. xix, xx.Google Scholar
1907. Reed, , “Fauna of the Bokkeveld Beds”: Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. IV, PP. 167–70.Google Scholar
1907. Gortani, , Mem. Accad. Scien. Instit. Bologna, ser. VI, tome iv, 1907, p. 229.Google Scholar
1908. Gürich, , Leitfossilien, Lief. 1, Kamb. u. Silur., pp. 71, 72.Google Scholar
1909. Gürich, , Leitfossilien, Lief. 2, Devon, pp. 157–68.Google Scholar
1911. Wedekind, , “Klassifikation der Phacopiden”: Zeitschr. deut. geol. Gesell., lxii, pp. 317–36, t. xv, xvi.Google Scholar
1913. Raymond, in Eastman Zittel's Textbook of Palaeontology, 2nd ed., pp. 725–7.Google Scholar
1913. Clarke, , “Foss. devon. Parana”: Mon. Serv. geol. e Miner. Brasil, vol. i, pp. 101–59, pls. iii–vii.Google Scholar
1913. Kozlowski, , “Faune devon. Parana”: Annales de Paléontologie (Paris), viii, P. 14.Google Scholar
1914. Wedekind, , “Paläont. Beitr. Geol. Kellerwaldes”: Abh. k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft. 69, pp. 25 74, t. i–v.Google Scholar
1914. Reed, , “Lower Palaeoz. Trilob. Girvan”: (Palaeont. Soc.) Supplement, pp. 48–54, pl. viii.Google Scholar
1915. Perna, , “Upper Devonian Trilobites”: Mem. Com. Geol. Russ., N.S., Livr. 138, 1915, pp. 50–6.Google Scholar
1918. McLearn, , “Revision of some Phacopid genera”: Ottawa Naturalist. vol. xxxii, pp. 31–6.Google Scholar
1919. Rud, . and Richter, E., Ueber Phacops laevis, etc., Senckenbergiana, Bd. 1, No. 4, pp. 131–40.Google Scholar
1923. (1) Rud, and Richter, E., System. u. Stratigr. Oberdev. Trilob. Ostthür. Schiefergeb., Senckenbergiana, Bd. v, Heft 1–2, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
1923. (2)Rud, and Richter, E., System. u. Stratigr. Oberdev. Trilob. Ostthür. Schiefergeb., Senckenbergiana, Bd. v, Heft 3–4, pp. 134–143.Google Scholar
1923. Kozlowski, , “Faune dévonienne de Bolivie”: Annales de Paleontologie (Paris), xii, fasc. 1 and 2,. pp. 26–58, pls. ii–vi.Google Scholar
1924. McLearn, , Palaeont. Silur. Rocks, Arisaig, N.S., Mem. 137 Geol. Surv. Canada, pp. 166–71.Google Scholar
1925. Reed, , “Revision of the Fauna of the Bokkeveld Beds”: Ann. South African Museum, vol. xxii, pp. 122–62.Google Scholar
1925. , R. and Richter, E., “Unterlagen zum Fossilium Catalogus. Trilobitae III”: Senckenbergiana, Bd. vii, Heft 6, p. 243.Google Scholar
1925. (2) Reed, , “Some new Silurian Trilobites”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LXII, No. 728, pp. 73–5, Pl. II, Figs. 4, 4a.Google Scholar
1925. Warburg, , “The Trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarne”: Bull. Geol. Instit. Upsala, vol. xvii, 1925, pp. 396–410.Google Scholar
1926. , R. and Richter, E., Trilobiten der Oberdevons, Abh. preuss. geol. Landesanst., N.F., Heft 99, pp. 126–235, t. 8–12.Google Scholar