Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:10:15.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-glacial Foraminifera from the English Fenlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. A. Macfadyen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are three principal types, peat, fen clay (otherwise called blue buttery clay), and silt, in the post-glacial deposits of the Fenlands, which lie mainly within the shires of Cambridge and Lincoln, and Norfolk. It has long been known that Foraminifera occur in the silt and clay. The genus Lagena was recorded from the silt by Williamson in 1848, with twelve species from March, and sixteen species from Boston. In 1865, Parker and Jones listed thirty-five species of various genera from four samples of sub-Recent clay and silty clay from near Peterborough, Boston, and Wisbech. In 1870, H. B. Brady described the living brackish water Foraminifera from our coasts, and compared them with those recorded from the sub-Recent Fenland deposits by Parker and Jones. In a footnote (p. 306) he added the record of eight more species, so he presumably had a private communication from these authors, or himself studied further material. In 1881, James Green in two short papers noted the occurrence of abundant Foraminifera in layers of the March roddon, and figured nine species therefrom.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 75 , Issue 9 , September 1938 , pp. 409 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, H. B., 1870. In Brady, Robertson, and Brady, , “The Ostracoda and Foraminifera of Tidal Rivers,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 4, vi, 273–306, pls. xi, xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J. A., 1933.Foraminifera, their Classification and Economic Use, 2nd ed. 8vo., Sharon, Mass.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1938. “The Origin of Roddons,” Geogr. Journ., xei, 241–250.Google Scholar
Green, J., 1881. “Foraminiferous Silt Banks of the Isle of Ely,” Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc., 2, i, 473.Google Scholar
Green, J., 1881. “Microscopic Object Hunting,” Amer. Journ. Microscopy, vi, 45, 46, plate.Google Scholar
Macfadyen, W. A., 1933. “The Foraminifera of the Fenland Clays at St. Germans, near King's Lynn,” Geol. Mao., LXX, 182–191.Google Scholar
Macfadyen, W. A., 1933. In Graham, Clark, “Report on an Early Bronze Age Site in the South-Eastern Fens,” Antiquaries Journ., xiii (Foraminifera, 289–292).Google Scholar
Macfadyen, W. A., 1933. In Gordon, Fowler, “Fenland Waterways, Past and Present, South Level District—Part I,” Cambridge Antiq. Soc. Communications, xxxiii (Foraminifera, 125–7).Google Scholar
Parker, W. K., and Jones, T. R., 1865. “On some Foraminifera from the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, including Davis Straits and Baffin's Bay,” Phil. Trans., 325–441, pls. xii–xix.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1848. “On the Recent British Species of the Genus Lagena,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 2, i, 1–20, pls. i, ii.Google Scholar