Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T15:04:20.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microplankton from the Speeton Clay of Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. W. Neale  and
W. A. S. Sarjeant
J. W. Neale
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Hull.
W. A. S. Sarjeant
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Sedimentology, Department of Geology, University of Reading.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New genera and species of microplankton from a borehole through the Speeton Clay (Lower Cretaceous) of West Heslerton, Yorkshire, are described. One genus, two subgenera and seven species of dinoflagellates, and three species of hystrichospheres, are described, and a new family of dinoflagellates, the Muderongiidae, is set up.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 99 , Issue 5 , October 1962 , pp. 439 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberti, G., 1961. Zur Kenntnis mesozoischer und alttertiärer Dinoflagellaten und Hystrichosphaerideen von Nord—und Mitteldeutschland sowie einigen anderen europasichen Gebieten. Palaeontographica ser. A, 116, 1–58.Google Scholar
Chatton, E., 1952. Classe des Dinoflagellés ou Péridiniens in J. Piveteau, Traité de Zoologie, 1, 309–390.Google Scholar
Cookson, I. C., and Eisenack, A., 1958. Microplankton from Australian and New Guinea Upper Mesozoic sediments. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, 70, 19–79.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1934. Sur les microfossiles d'origine planctonique conservés a l'état de matière organique dans les silex de la craie. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 119, 966–8.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1935. Considerations biologiques sur les organismes d'origine planctonique conservés dans les silex de la craie. Bull. Biol. Fr. et Belg., 69, 213–244.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1937. Microfossiles des silex crétacés II. Ann. Paléont. 26, 51–103.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1938. Microplancton des mers jurassiques conservé dans les marnes de Villers-sur-Mer (Calvados): Trav. Stat. Zool. Wimereux. 13, Vol. Jub. M. Caullery, 147–200.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1946. Fichier micropaléontologique ser. 6. Hystrichosphaeridées II. Arch. Orig. Serv. Docum. C.N.R.S., no. 235, cards ds. 860–1019.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., and Cookson, I. C., 1955. Fossil microplankton from Australian late Mesozoic and Tertiary sediments. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res., 6, 242–313.Google Scholar
De Wit, R., 1944. Microorganismen in Limburgsche Vuursten. Natuurh. Maandbl., 7–8, 52–4.Google Scholar
Downie, C., Williams, G. L., and Sarjeant, W. A. S., 1961. Classification of fossil microplankton. Nature, 192, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1838. Uber des Massenverhaltnis der jetzt labenden Kieselinfusorien und über ein neues Infusorien-Conglomerat als Polierschiefer von Jastraba in Ungarn. Abhand. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1836), 1, 109–135.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1954. Mikrogeologie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1958. Mikroplankton aus dem norddeutschen Apt nebst einiger Bemerkungen über fossile Dinoflagellaten. Neu. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 106, 383–422.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1961. Einige Erörterungen uber fossile Dinoflagellaten nebst Ubersicht über die zur Zeit bekannten Gattungen. Neu. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 112, 281–324.Google Scholar
Evitt, W. R., 1961. Observations on the morphology of fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology, 7, 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocht, H., 1957. Mikroplankton aus dem nordwestdeutschen Neokom I. Paläont. Z., 31, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocht, H., 1959. Mikroplankton aus dem nordwestdeutschen Neokom II. Paläont. Z., 33, 50–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, J. W., 1868. On the Speeton Clay. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 24, 218–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klement, K. W., 1960. Dinoflagellaten und Hystrichosphaerideen aus dem Unteren and Mittleren Malm Südwestdeutschlands. Palaeontographica ser. A., 114, 1–104.Google Scholar
Lamplugh, G. W., 1889. On the subdivisions of the Speeton Clay. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 45, 575–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanjouw, J. et al. , 1956. International code of Botanical nomenclature. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Lejeune-Carpentier, M., 1940. L'étude microscopique des silex (8 ieme Note). Systematique et morphologie des “Tubifères”. Ann. Soc. Geol. Belq., 63, B216–36.Google Scholar
Neale, J. W., 1960. Marine Lower Cretaceous Ostracoda from Yorkshire, England. Micropaleontology, 6, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, J. W., 1961. The subdivision of the Upper D Beds of the Speeton Clay of Speeton, East Yorkshire. Geol. Mag., 97, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, J. W., 1962. Ammonoidea from the Lower D Beds (Berriaisian) of the Speeton Clay. Palaeontology, 5, 272–96.Google Scholar
Reade, Rev. J. B., 1839. On some new organic remains from the Flint of the Chalk. Ann. Nat. Hist., 2, 191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarjeant, W. A. S., 1961. Systematophora Klement and Polystephanosphaera Sarjeant. J. Paleont., 35, 1095–6.Google Scholar
Valensi, L., 1955. Etude micropaléontologique des silex du Magdalenien de Saint-Amand (Cher). Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr., 52, 584–596.Google Scholar
Wetzel, O., 1933. Die in organischer Substanz erhaltenen Mikrofossilien des Baltischen Kreide-Feuersteins. Palaeontographica, 77, 141–188 and 78, 1–110.Google Scholar
Wetzel, W., 1952. Beitrag zur Kenntnis des dan-zeitlichen Meeresplanktons. Geol. Jber., 66, 391–418.Google Scholar
White, H. H., 1842. On fossil Xanthidia. Microscop. J., 2, 35–40.Google Scholar
Wiesner, H., 1936. Sur la découverte de Diatomées et autres microfossiles peu connus dans le Cretace supérieur de la Boheme. Ann. Protist., 5, 151–5.Google Scholar