Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T17:36:11.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The inadunate crinoid genus Cryphiocrinus Kirk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Harrell L. Strimple
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

Summary

Cryphiocrinus Kirk is a genus which may possess a delicate stem, or may lose the stem as an adult, making it essentially eleutherozoic. C. girtyi Kirk, type species, is documented with certainty from Chesterian rocks of Oklahoma and Arkansas for the first time. C. rotundus Kirk is reported from the Renault Formation of Illinois and a possible occurrence in the Pride Mountain Formation of Alabama is noted. The genus has previously been recognized in Chesterian, Upper Mississippian, (Lower Carboniferous), strata exposed in West Virginia, Kentucky and Oklahoma, U.S.A. Possible affinity with Hosieocrinus Wright from the Lower Limestone Group (Visean) in Scotland is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. & Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Amer. 734 pp.Google Scholar
Burdick, D. W. & Strimple, H. L. 1969. Revision of some Chesterian inadunate crinoids. Univ. Kans. Paleo. Contr., Paper 40, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Burdick, D. W. & Strimple, H. L. 1971. Crinoids from the Beech Creek Limestone, Lower Golconda Group, St. Claire County, Illinois. Univ. Kans. Paleo. Contr., Paper 51, 1547.Google Scholar
Ettensohn, F. R. 1975. The autecology of Agassizocrinus lobatus. J. Paleont. 49, 1044–60.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1929. Cryphiocrinus, a new genus of free-swimming crinoids. Am J. Sci. 17, 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, W. D. 1969. Declinida, a new order to late Paleozoic inadunate crinoids. J. Paleont. 43, 340–91.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1890. (1889). North American geology and paleontology. Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., Lane, N. G. & Strimple, H. L. 1973. In Moore & Strimple, Lower Pennsylvanian (Morrowan) crinoids from Arkansas, Oklahoma and Texas. Univ. Kans., Paleo. Contr., Art. 60, 1531.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. & Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geol. Soc. Am. Paper 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. & Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea. In Shimer & Shroek, Index Fossils of North America. Mass. Inst. Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. Unusual forms of fossil crinoids. Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum, 67, (9), 137 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1949. Mooreocrinus bowsheri, new species from the Chester Series of northeastern Oklahoma. Am. J. Sci. 247, 128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1951. New Carboniferous crinoids. J. Paleont. 25, 669–76.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1961. Late Desmoinesian crinoid faunule from Oklahoma. Bull Okla. geol. Surv. 93, 189 p.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1962. Associated Cryphiocrinus and Agassizocrinus. Okla. geol Surv. Okla. Geol. Notes. 229, 183–8.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1952. A monograph of the British Carboniferous crinoidea. Palaeontogr. Soc., v. 1, Pt. 15: 149–90.Google Scholar