Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:16:00.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—On Ammonites serpentinus, Reinecke, Am. falcifer, Sowb., Am. elegans, Sowb., Am. Elegans, Young, etc.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

I have had occasion lately to thoroughly investigate these and other allied Ammonites, partly because it has been important to me that I should know the true affinities of these species, partly because my attention was directed to certain still obscure points with regard to their identification, and partly on account of the statement by the late Dr. Wright that Am. serpentinus and Am. falcifer were the same species. In pursuing my investigations I have received a great deal of assistance from Dr. E. Hang's Beiträge zu einer Monographie der Ammoniten-gattung Harpoceras, which I am pleased to acknowledge, although I do not find myself able to agree with him in one or two small points which I will presently mention. Meanwhile, by the aid of a few references to well-known works, I will indicate the Ammonites so that they may be understood.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1887

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 396 note 1 Neues Jahrbuch für Mineral. Beil. Bd. iii. 1885.Google Scholar

page 397 note 1 Compare genus Hildoceras. Mould showing shape of keel; ventral area flattened or furrowed; inner margin subconcave, sloping. Very broad siphonal saddle, small accessory lobe, superior lateral lobe little branched, inferior lateral and auxiliaries produced.