^{page 492 note 2} Guillaume Grandidier, “Sur les Lémuriens subfossiles de Madagascar”: C. R. Ac. Sci. Paris, 28 Mai, 1900.Google Scholar

^{page 492 note 3} Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1899, p. 988.Google Scholar

^{page 492 note 4} “Extinct Mammalia from Madagascar. I. Megaladapis insignis, .sp.n.”: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. exeiii (1900), p. 47.Google Scholar

^{page 493 note 1} Ludwig Ritt. Lorenz v. Liburnau, “Über einige Reste ausgestorbener Primaten von Madagaskar” : Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien., lxx (1900), p. 8, pl. ii.Google Scholar

^{page 493 note 2} Op. cit., p. 10, pl. iii, fig. 3.

^{page 493 note 3} Dr. v. Lorenz, when writing his paper, was not aware of this circumstance.

^{page 493 note 4} Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, vol. clxxxv (1894), p. 27Google Scholar; Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. lxii (1897), p. 49.Google Scholar

^{page 493 note 5} Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 11 19, 1899, p. 989.Google Scholar

^{page 493 note 6} Op. cit., 1900, p. 8, pl. ii.

^{page 493 note 7} Anzeiger Akad. Wiss. Wien., 1900, No. 1, p. 8 (teste Lorenz).

^{page 493 note 8} Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien., lxx (1900), p. 10, pl. iii, fig. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 493 note 9} Bull, . Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1899, No. 6, pp. 272–275.Google Scholar

^{page 494 note 1} Bull, . Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1899, No. 6, p. 275; No. 7, p. 344.Google Scholar

^{page 494 note 2} Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 1873, p. 490.

^{page 494 note 3} Bull, . Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1899, No. 7, p. 345.Google Scholar

^{page 495 note 1} Op. cit., p. 14.

^{page 495 note 2} Bull, . Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1895, No. 1, p. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 495 note 3} Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1893, p. 532.

^{page 495 note 4} Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. lxii (1897), p. 46.Google Scholar

^{page 495 note 5} Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. III, 10, 1896, p. 436.Google Scholar

^{page 495 note 6} Loc. cit., p. 13.

^{page 495 note 7} Bull, . Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1899, No. 7, pp. 346–348, with five text-figures.Google Scholar

^{page 496 note 1} Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1899, p. 988. Protoindris globiceps, Lorenz (Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien., lxx, 1900, p. 11, pl. iii, fig. 2), is based on a photograph from Mr. Sikora representing the reduced side view of the type of Nesopithecus australis.

^{page 496 note 2} It is possible that my Globilemur Flacourti from the neighbourhood of Nossi-Vé on the south-west coast may prove to be specifically identical with Bradylemur Bastardi, G. Grand. (Bull. Mus. d'hist. nat. Paris, 1900, No. 5, p. 215), from Ambolisatra.Google Scholar

^{page 496 note 3} Journ. Anat. — Physiol., iii, 1868, pp. 73–80 (1869).Google Scholar

^{page 496 note 4} “Über die Eckzähne der Lemuriden” : Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde, Berlin, 15th December, 1868, p. 32.Google Scholar

^{page 496 note 5} Op. cit., p. 7.

^{page 496 note 6} “Histoire physique, naturelle, et politique de Madagascar,” Mammifères, i. p. 32, footnote 3 (1876).Google Scholar

^{page 497 note 1} Bateson, W. : “Materials for the Study of Variation, etc.,” 1894, pp. 206, 207, fig. 38.Google Scholar

^{page 498 note 1} “Histoire physique, naturelle, et politique de Madagascar,” Mammifères, i (1876).Google Scholar

^{page 498 note 2} “If, in accordance with the traditional views of zoologists, the Lemurs are still considered to be members of this order [i.e. Primates], they must form a sub-order apart from all the others, with which they have really very little in common except the opposable hallux of the hind foot, a character also met with in the Opossums, and which is therefore of very secondary importance.”—Flower, — Lydekker, : “An Introduction to the Study of Mammals, living and extinct,” 1891, p. 680.Google Scholar

^{page 499 note 1} “Uber einige Reste ausgestorbener Primaten von Madagaskar” : loc. cit., pp. 2–8, pl. i, figs. 1–7.Google Scholar