Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T05:16:28.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a New Zealand Tremadocian trilobite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. J. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, N.S.W., 2500, Australia

Summary

Dionide hectori Reed, 1926, is shown on the basis of new collections from the type area in New Zealand to be a Tremadocian ceratopygide close to Hysterolenus. The species was placed in Taihungshania by Kobayashi (1941). It was provisionally retained in the Taihungshaniidae by Lu (1975) who made hectori type species of a new genus Hectoria (non Hectoria Trechmann, 1918). Ruapyge nom.nov. is proposed here for the reception of hectori. The original length/width ratio is determined by Wellman's method, with little consistency in results. Data from the strain ellipses constructed by Wellman's method are then used to calculate values for the attitude of the line of no finite longitudinal strain. The values obtained graphically do not agree with those derived from a formula given by Ramsay (1967); this contradictory situation is in need of explanation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarkson, E. N. K. 1975. The evolution of the eye in trilobites. Fossils and Strata 4, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, A. C. 1977. Stratigraphy and structure of the Mount Patriarch-Crow River area. North-west Nelson, New Zealand. N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys. 20, 401–23.Google Scholar
Cook, H. & Taylor, M. 1975. Early Paleozoic continental margin sedimentation, trilobite biofacies, and the thermocline, western United States. Geology 3, 559–62.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A. 1975. New Zealand and south-east Australia in the early Paleozoic. N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys. 18, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. A. & Druce, E. C. 1975. Lower Ordovician sequence and conodonts, Mount Patriarch, North-west Nelson, New Zealand. N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys. 18, 551–82.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1967. The distribution of Ordovician shelly faunas in the Tethyan region. Syst. Ass. Publ. 7, 1144.Google Scholar
Grindley, G. W. 1961. Golden Bay ‘Geological Map of New Zealand 1:250,000’, 1st ed. D.S.I.R., Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. et al. 1959. Trilobita. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O. Arthropoda, 1, xix, 01–0560 (ed. Moore, R. C.). Geological Society of America and Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. & Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Spec. Publ. Univ. Kans. Dep. Geol. 1, 1276.Google Scholar
Henderson, J., Macpherson, E. O. & Grange, L. I. 1959. The geology of Motueka Subdivision. Bull. geol. Surv. N.Z., N.S. 35, 126.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1960. The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo region, Norway. 13. Trilobites of the family Asaphidae. Norsk. geol. Tidsskr. 40, 203–57.Google Scholar
Hirsinger, V. 1976. Numerical strain analysis using polar coordinate transformations. Jl Int. Ass. Math. Geol. 8, 183202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. P. & Wright, A. J. 1970. The trilobites Incaia Whittard 1955 and Anebolithus gen.nov. Palaeontology 13, 677–90.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1953. Untersuchungen über baltoskandische Asaphiden I. Ark. Miner. Geol. 1, 377464.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1941. On the occurrence of Taihungshania, a characteristic Arenigian trilobite, in New Zealand. Jap. J. Geol. Geog. 17, 195201.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1971. The Eurasiatic faunal connection in the Ordovician Period. Mem. B.R.G.M. 73, 281–90.Google Scholar
Lisogor, K. A. 1961. Trilobites from Tremadocian and associated deposits from Kendiktas. Trudy geol. Inst., Akad. nauk., SSS.R. 18, 5592[in Russian].Google Scholar
Lu, Yen-Hao. 1975. Ordovician trilobite faunas of central and southwestern China. Palaeont. sin., N.S. B 11 (whole number 152), vi + 1–261. [In Chinese; English translation 263463.]Google Scholar
Lu, Yen-Hao, Chang, W. T., Chu, , Chao-Ling, , Chien, , Yi-Yuan, & Hsiang, , Lee-Wen, . 1965. Chinese Fossils of All Groups: Trilobita, vol. 1, 1362; vol. 2, 363766. Peking: Science Publication Co.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1975. Structure and function of trilobite terrace lines. Fossils and Strata 4, 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. 1967. Folding and Fracturing of Rocks. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1926. New trilobites from the Ordovician Beds of New Zealand. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 57, 310–14.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. 1975. Early Paleozoic trilobites, sedimentary facies, lithospheric plates, and ocean currents. Fossils and Strata 4, 307–29.Google Scholar
Skwarko, S. 1962. Graptolites of the Cobb River-Mount Arthur area, North-west Nelson. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. (Geology) 1, 215247.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. 1931. Ordovician trilobites of central and southern China. Palaeont. sin. B 7 (1), 147.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1976. Indigenous and redeposited trilobites from Late Cambrian basinal environments of Central Nevada. J. Paleont. 50, 668700.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. & Cook, H. E. 1976. Continental shelf and slope facies in the Upper Cambrian and Lowest Ordovican of Nevada. Brigham Young Univ. Geol. Studies 23, 181214.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T. 1918. The Trias of New Zealand. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 73 (for 1917), 165246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troedsson, G. 1937. On the Cambro-Ordovician faunas of Western Quruq tagh, eastern Tien-shan. Palaeont. sin. N.S. B 2 (whole series number 106), 174.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. W. 1962. A graphical method for analysing fossil distortion caused by tectonic deformation. Geol. Mag. 99, 348–52.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1966. Phylogeny and distribution of Ordovician trilobites. J. Paleont. 40, 696737.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1973. Ordovician trilobites. In Atlas of biogeography (ed. Hallam, A.), pp. 1318. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Hughes, C. P. 1972. Ordovician geography and faunal provinces deduced from trilobite distribution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 263, 235–78.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Hughes, C. P. 1974. Geography and faunal provinces in the Tremadoc epoch. Sp. Publ. Soc. Econ. Pal. Min. 21, 203–18.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J. 1968. Ordovician conodonts from New Zealand. Nature, Lond. 218, 664–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar