Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:24:37.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VI.—Second Note on the Expansion Theory of Mountain Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Charles Davison
Affiliation:
Mathematical Master at King Edward's High School, Birmingham.

Extract

In a note published four years ago,1 I pointed out a fundamental objection to the principle of the expansion theory. That objection has been clearly expressed as follows by Prof. Leconte,2 who, like myself, considers it fatal to the theory: “Sedimentation cannot, of course, increase the sum of heat in the earth. Therefore the increased heat of the sediments by rise of isogeotherms, must be taken from somewhere else. Is it taken from below? Then the radius [or rather crust] below must contract as much as the sediments expand, and therefore there will be no elevation. Is it taken from the containing sides? Then the sides must lose as much as the sediments gain, and therefore must contract and make room for the lateral expansion, and therefore there would be no folding and no elevation.”

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1895

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 308 note 1 Geol. Mag., Vol. VIII, 1891, p. 210.Google Scholar

page 308 note 2 Journ. of Geol., vol. i, 1893, pp. 570571.Google Scholar