Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:36:56.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description in the geological sciences and the Lithostratigraphic Descriptive System, LSDØ2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

John Odell
John Odell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Sedgwick Museum, Downing Street, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A discussion of geological description and an account of the Descriptive System LSDØ2 are given. It is shown that by examination of the aims of description and of its main instrument, the geological observer, a set of principles and objectives may be established in order to design descriptive systems. The application of these principles is demonstrated by an account of the theory and practical aspects of the Lithostratigraphic Descriptive System LSDØ2.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 81 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander-Marrack, P. D., Friend, P. F. & Yeats, A. K. 1971. Mark sensing for recording and analysis of sedimentological data. In Cutbill, J. L. (Ed.): Data Processing in Biology and Geology, Systematics Association Spec. Vol. 3, 1–16. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Bouma, A. H. & Nota, D. J. G. 1961. Detailed graphic log of sedimentary formations. 21st Int. Geol. Congress (Copenhagen), Pt. 23, 52–74.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. Z. & Briggs, L. I. 1970. Design of information systems in a laboratory of subsurface geology. Mich. Academician 11(4), 73–86.Google Scholar
Briggs, L. I. & Briggs, D. Z. 1969. Stratigraphic analysis. In Merriam, D. F. (Ed.): Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences, 13–39. Plenum Press, London & New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. K. 1975. A psychological analysis of observation in geology. Nature, Lond. 256, 570–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. K. 1976. Visual illusions in geology. Nature, Lond. 260, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, R. R. 1962. Manual of Field Geology, 378 pp. John Wiley & Sons, New York, London & Sydney.Google Scholar
Cutbill, J. L. 1971. Cambridge research on data processing in geology. Office for Scientific and Technical Information Rept. 5109.Google Scholar
Dixon, C. J. 1970. Semantic symbols. J. math. Geol. 2 (1), 81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, C. J. 1971. Machine languages for representation of geological information. In Cutbill, J. L. (Ed.): Data Processing in Biology and Geology, Systematics Association Spec. Vol. 3, 123–34. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. E. & Strauss, P. G. 1967. A classification of coal measures rocks based on quartz content. 6th Int. Congress carb. Strat. Geol. (Sheffield), 715–23.Google Scholar
Fitts, P. M. & Posner, M. I. 1967. Human Performance, 162 pp. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Gilliand, J. A. & Grove, G. 1973. Some principles of data storage and information retrieval and their implications for information exchange. J. math. Geol. 5 (1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, E. N. (Chairman USGS) 1970. Rock-color chart (reprinted). Distributed by the Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. 1953. Estimation of error in grain size analysis. J. sedim. Petrol. 23, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. 1961. Measurement of the properties of sediments. J. Geol. 69 (5), 487–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. 1967. Scientific method in Analysis of Sediments, 508 pp. McGraw-Hill, New York & London.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. 1968. Sampling a geological population. Kansas Surv., Comput. Contr. (30), 53 pp.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. & Rosenfeld, M. A. 1954. Operator variation in experimental research. J. Geol. 62(4), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himus, G. W. & Sweeting, G. S. 1972. The Elements of Field Geology (3rd edition), 280 pp. University Tutorial Press, London.Google Scholar
Hubaux, A. 1970. Description of geological objects. J. math. Geol. 2 (1), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubaux, A. 1971. Scheme for a quick description of rocks. J. math. Geol. 3(3), 317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubaux, A. 1973. A new geological tool – the data. Earth Sci. Rev. 9, 159–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, W. W. (Chairman, COGEODATA) 1975. Computer-based systems for geological field data. Geol. Surv. Canada GSC Paper 74–63.Google Scholar
Kornerup, A. & Wanscher, J. H. 1967. Methuen Handbook of Colour (2nd edition), 243 pp. Methuen & Co., London.Google Scholar
Kottlowski, F. E. 1965. Measuring Stratigraphic Sections, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York & London.Google Scholar
Laffitte, P. 1968. L'informatique géologique et la terminologie. Mineralium Deposita 3 (2), 187—96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffitte, P. 1969. La codification semantique en informatique géologique. Annls. Mines Carbur. 12, 75–83.Google Scholar
Laffitte, P. (Ed.) 1972. Traité d'informatique géologique, 624 pp. Masson & Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Lahee, F. H. 1941. Field Geology, 853 pp. McGraw-Hill, New York & London.Google Scholar
Lees, G. 1964. A new method for determining the angularity of particles. Sedimentol. 3, 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, J. W. 1957. Geologic Field Methods, 489 pp. Harper & Bros., New York.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. 1973. Towards greater precision in rock color terminology. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84(6), 1907–9.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, G. 1967. Methods in Sedimentary Petrology. 283 pp. Hafner Publ. Co., New York & London.Google Scholar
Odell, J. (in press). Application of a computer-based system for field data to Tertiary strata in Svalbard.Google Scholar
Pickton, C. A. G. & Harland, W. B. 1975. Cambridge–Hamburg Svalbard Expedition, 1975. Polar Rec. 18 (112), 72–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, D. J. W., Harland, W. B. & Cutbill, J. L. 1971. Recording of geological data in the field using forms for input to the IBM handwriting reader. In Cutbill, J. L. (Ed.): Data Processing in Biology and Geology, Systematics Association Spec. Vol. 3, 17–38. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. A. & Griffiths, J. C. 1953. An experimental test of visual comparison technique in estimating 2-dimensional sphericity and roundness of quartz grains. Am. J. Sci. 251, 553–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy, 573 pp. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1970. The intelligent ignoramus, an experiment in numerical taxonomy. Taxon 19, 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadell, Hakon. 1933. Sphericity and roundness of rock particles. J. Geol. 41, 310–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentworth, C. K. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol. 30, 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, W. B. 1972. The description and measurement of sedimentary particles and the concept of form. J. sedim. Petrol. 42 (4), 961–5.Google Scholar
Zigic-Toshich, D. & Briggs, L. I. 1968. Information structure of stratigraphy. 23rd Int. Geol. Congress (Prague) pt. 13, 211–15.Google Scholar