Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T16:20:23.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pleiotropy as a factor maintaining genetic variation in quantitative characters under stabilizing selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. Gimelfarb
A. Gimelfarb
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model of pleiotropy with N diallelic loci contributing additively to N quantitative traits and stabilizing selection acting on each of the traits is considered. Every locus has a major contribution to one trait and a minor contribution to the rest of them, while every trait is controlled by one major locus and N−1 minor loci. It is demonstrated that a stable equilibrium with the allelic frequency equal to 0·5 in all N loci can be maintained in such a model for a wide range of parameters. Such a ‘totally polymorphic’ equilibrium is maintained for practically any strength of selection and any recombination, if the relative contribution by a minor locus to a trait is less than 20 % of the contribution by a major locus. The dynamic behaviour of the model is shown to be quite complex with a possibility under sufficiently strong selection of multiple stable equilibria and positive linkage disequilibria between loci. It is also suggested that pleiotropy among loci controlling traits experiencing direct selection can be responsible for apparent selection on neutral traits also controlled by these loci.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , August 1996 , pp. 65 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

Barton, N. H. (1986). The maintenance of polygenic variation through a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research, Cambridge 47, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H. (1990). Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics 124, 773–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. (1989). Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annual Review of Genetics 23, 337–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M. G. (1989). Maintenance of genetic variability by mutation-selection balance: a child's guide through the jungle. Genome 31, 761–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürger, R. (1988). Mutation-selection balance and continuum-of-alleles models. Mathematical Biosciences, 91, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. G., Wang, L. & Hullenberg, T. (1995). P-element induced variation in metabolic regulation in Drosophila. Genetics 139, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, M. D., Stuber, C. W. & Wendel, J. F. (1987). Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gale, J. S. & Kearsey, M. J. (1968). Stable equilibria under stabilising selection in the absence of dominance. Heredity 23, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S. & De Jong, G. (1993). Pleiotropic models of polygenic variation, stabilizing selection and epistasis. Genetics 134, 609–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. & Hastings, A. (1993). Maintenance of genetic variability under strong stabilizing selection: two-locus model. Genetics 134, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. & Hastings, A., (1994 a). Maintenance of multilocus variability under strong stabilizing selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology 32, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. & Hastings, A. (1994 b). Dynamics of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection. Genetics 138, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, J. H. (1984). Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic characters. Genetics 107, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gimelfarb, A. (1986). Additive variation maintained under stabilizing selection: a two-locus model of pleiotropy for two quantitative traits. Genetics 112, 717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimelfarb, A. (1989). Genotypic variation maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis. Genetics 123, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gimelfarb, A. (1992). Pleiotropy and multilocus polymorphisms. Genetics 130, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gimelfarb, A. (1996). Some additional results about polymorphisms in models of a quantitative trait under stabilizing selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology (in the press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, A. & Horn, C. L. (1989). Pleiotropic stabilizing selection limits the number of polymorphic loci to at most the number of characters. Genetics 122, 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A. & Horn, C. L. (1990). Multiple equilibria and maintenance of additive genetic variation in a model of pleiotropy. Evolution 44, 1153–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S. & Carmelli, D. (1975). Numerical studies of twolocus selection models with general selection. Theoretical Population Biology 7, 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S. & Feldman, M. (1970). Linkage and selection: two-locus symmetric viability model. Theoretical Population Biology 1, 39–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearsey, M. J. & Gale, J. S. (1968). Stabilising selection in the absence of dominance: additional note. Heredity 23, 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keightley, P. D. & Hill, W. G. (1990). Variation maintained in quantitative traits with mutation-selection balance: pleiotropic side effects on fitness traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 242, 95–100.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1975). The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genetical Research, Cambridge 26, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1980). The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1964). The interaction of selection and linkage. II. Optimal model. Genetics 50, 757–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, T. F. C., Lyman, R. F. & Jackson, M. S. (1992). Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 130, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagylaki, T. (1989). The maintenance of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection. Genetics 122, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, A. H., De Verna, J. W., Lanini, B. & Tanksley, S. D. (1990). Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124, 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1956). The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis. Journal of Genetics 54, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. R. (1982). Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance and genetic variation. Heredity 48, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. R., Service, P. M. & Hatchinson, E. W. (1987). Three approaches to trade-offs in life-history evolution. In Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution, ed. Loeschcke, V.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Santiago, E., Albornoz, J., Dominguez, A., Toro, M. A. & Lopez-Fanjul, C. (1992). The distribution of spontaneous mutations in quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 132, 771–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serebrovsky, A. S. (1973). Nekotorye Problemi Organicheskoy Evolutsii. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Shnoll, E. E. & Kondrashov, A. S. (1993). The effect of selection on phenotypic variance. Genetics 134, 995–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimpton, A. E. & Robertson, A. (1988). The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics 118, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. (1987). Heritable variation and heterozygosity under a balance between mutations and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research, Cambridge 50, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. & Frank, S. A. (1990). The quantitative genetic consequences of pleiotropy under stabilizing and directional selection. Genetics 125, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turelli, M. (1984). Heritable genetic variation via mutationselection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology 25, 138–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. (1985). Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation-selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, G. P. (1989). Multivariate mutation-selection balance with constrained pleiotropic effects. Genetics 122, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1935). Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. Journal of Genetics 30, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1968). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar