Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:03:57.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotype, protein, phenotype relationships in self-incompatibility of Brassica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

M. E. Nasrallah ,
D. H. Wallace  and
R. M. Savo
M. E. Nasrallah
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Cortland, New York 13045
D. H. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Cortland, New York 13045
R. M. Savo
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Cortland, New York 13045
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The inheritance of self-incompatibility proteins was studied in three homozygous self-incompatible genotypes of Brassica oleracea var. capitata and their F1 and F2 progenies. The presence or absence in the stigma of incompatibility proteins was determined by immunodiffusion and independently by disk electrophoresis. Certain proteins (antigens) were present in F1 and F2 plants in exact correlation with segregation of the S alleles as determined by phenotypic expression of incompatibility. An S allele–protein–phenotype relationship was thus verified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 151 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Bateman, A. J. (1952). Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms. I. Theory. Heredity 6, 285–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A. J. (1954). Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms. II. Iberis amara. Heredity 8, 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A. J. (1955). Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms. III. Cruciferae. Heredity 9, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haruta, T. (1962). Studies on the genetics of self-and cross-incompatibility in cruciferous vegetables. (Japanese with English summary.) Research Bulletin Takii Plant Breeding and Experiment Station, no. 2. Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, M. E. & Wallace, D. H. (1967 a). Immunogenetics of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea L. Heredity 22, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasrallah, M. E. & Wallace, D. H. (1967 b). Immunochemical detection of antigens in self-incompatibility genotypes of cabbage. Nature 213, 700–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasrallah, M. E., Barber, J. T. & Wallace, D. H. (1970). Self-incompatibility proteins in plants: detection, genetics and possible mode of action. Heredity 25, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odland, M. L. (1962). The genetics of incompatibility in broccoli Brassica oleracea var. italica. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 80, 387–400.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. F. (1957). Self-incompatibility in marrow-stem kale, Brassica oleracea var. acephala. I. Demonstration of a sporophytic system. Journal of Genetics 55, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. F. & Taylor, J. P. (1966). Non-linear dominance relationships between S alleles. Heredity 21, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. F. (1968). Classified S alleles for Brassica breeders. Proceeding of Brassica meeting of Eucarpia: 1968 (ed. Dixon, G. E.), pp. 25–28. Publication of the National vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, England.Google Scholar