Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:55:40.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of the APOB Gene and Apolipoprotein B Serum Levels in a Mexican Population with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Association with the Single Nucleotide Variants rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Maricela Aceves-Ramírez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Doctorado en Genética Humana (DGH), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Yeminia Valle
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Fidel Casillas-Muñoz
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Diana Emilia Martínez-Fernández
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Brenda Parra-Reyna
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Doctorado en Genética Humana (DGH), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Víctor Arturo López-Moreno
Affiliation:
Especialidad en Cardiología, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente (CMNO), Departamento de Cardiología, Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Héctor Enrique Flores-Salinas
Affiliation:
Especialidad en Cardiología, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente (CMNO), Departamento de Cardiología, Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Emmanuel Valdés-Alvarado
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
José Francisco Muñoz-Valle
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Texali García-Garduño
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Doctorado en Genética Humana (DGH), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Jorge Ramón Padilla-Gutiérrez*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas (IICB), Centro Universitario de Ciencias de La Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Jorge Ramón Padilla-Gutiérrez; imey_99@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Apolipoprotein B (APOB) is associated with the development of atherosclerosis and consequently in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) physiopathology. Single number variants (SNVs) in apolipoprotein B gene (APOB) influence over the susceptibility for this syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 SNVs and serum levels of APOB in the risk of ACS in a population from western Mexico. We included 300 patients in the group of cases (ACSG) and 300 individuals in the control group (CG). APOB levels were evaluated by immunonephelometry, and SNVs were genotyped with TaqMan probes. We found significant allelic and genotypic differences between groups for rs673548 and rs676210 (OR = 1.33, p=0.030, OR = 2.69, p < 0.001) and rs1042034 (OR = 0.50, p=0.037) SNVs. We found a risk haplotype TAGT (OR: 2.14, IC 1.50–3.04, p < 0.001). Our findings support a significant risk association between rs673548 and rs676210 variants for ACS; meanwhile, rs1042034 could be considered protective factor in a western Mexican population. Also, in this population, haplotype TAGT may confer 2.14 times a higher risk. APOB serum levels were compared by genotype variants in both groups without any significant statistical difference.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Maricela Aceves-Ramírez et al.

1. Introduction

In the world, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) represent the first cause of death [1]. Acute coronary syndrome, a part of CVD, comprises unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). These diseases differ in the degree of severity and are characterized by myocardial ischemia [Reference Hedayati, Yadav and Khanagavi2], caused by partial or total obstruction of the coronary circulation due to the disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque [Reference Davies3].

Apolipoprotein B (APOB) is a glycoprotein that participates in the assembly and secretion of lipids and in the intravascular transport and delivery of distinct lipoproteins related to the atherosclerotic plaque formation, principally low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) [Reference Davidson and Shelness4, Reference Borén and Williams5].

Trapping of the LDL within the arterial wall is the step that initiates and drives to the complications of the atherosclerotic [Reference Davidson and Shelness4, Reference Ference, Ginsberg and Graham6].

APOB is encoded by the APOB, a gene with 29 exons and 28 introns in its structure, located in chromosome 2 [Reference Blackhart, Ludwig and Pierotti7], and many SNVs in this gene have been associated with disorders in lipid metabolism, a main risk factor observed in patients with atherosclerosis [Reference Genest, Martin-Munley and McNamara8].

SNV rs676210 has been reported as a variant associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, and it should be noted that this is a major risk factor in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. [Reference Mäkelä, Seppälä and Hernesniemi9]. In Chinese population, rs676210 and rs1042034 SNVs have been associated with myocardial infarction as a cause of hyperlipidemia and are a factor for having higher levels of APOB [Reference Gu, Han and Lan10, Reference Liu, Yang and Han11]. Also, SNV rs1469513 has been reported to be associated with significant differences between carriers of allele G vs. A for total cholesterol and LDL levels and with other ACS risk factors like overweight and obesity in a Korean population [Reference Doo, Won and Kim12]. Variant rs673548 has been associated with other diseases related to disturbances in lipid metabolism [Reference Wang, Cao and Li13] and ischemia [Reference Zhou, Guo, Zhou, Zhou and Yu14], but its involvement in ACS has not been explored.

In Mexico, heart disease is the number one cause of death [15]; for this reason, the objective of this study was to determine the impact of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 APOB gene variants and APOB levels of in the risk of acute coronary syndrome in a Mexican population of western Mexico.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Compliance

The study was performed according to the ethical principles for experiments involving humans stated on the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval was obtained by the Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, CUCS, UdeG (C.I. 065–2014). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

2.2. Study Population

Six hundred unrelated individuals were included in this study, 300 in the case group (ACSG) and 300 in the control group (CG). In the ACS group, the inclusion criteria included diagnosis according to the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology [Reference Cannon, Brindis and Chaitman16]. As a control group, the inclusion criteria included individuals with a similar age to the cases. As exclusion criteria in ACS, we excluded individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia, individuals with overlapping other cardiac or noncardiac diseases (e.g., pulmonary embolism, pulmonary infarction, pneumothorax, pleurisy, pneumonia, anemia, aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, esophageal spasm, cerebrovascular disease), and genetically related individuals. In CG, we exclude individuals with a personal history of ischemic heart disease and familial hypercholesterolemia, and genetically related individual. In both groups, we exclude individuals who received a blood transfusion in the last three months before sampling.

In the ACS group, a review of the clinical record was carried out, from which data such as blood pressure, troponin levels, creatine kinase (CK), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) were obtained. All clinical data on height, weight, comorbidities, and lifestyle were obtained by questionnaire in both groups. The individuals in both groups are from western Mexico, as are their parents and grandparents.

2.3. Genetic Analysis

Genotyping was carried out by allelic discrimination using TaqMan probes (rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, rs1042034) (catalog 4351379) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As a quality control, 25% of the samples were double genotyped and a 100% matching was obtained.

2.4. Quantification of Serum APOB Levels

APOB levels were measured by using a turbidimetry technique [Reference Marcovina, Albers, Kennedy, Mei, Henderson and Hannon17] according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioSystems) on a Mindray BS-120 equipment from Mindray Medical España S.L.

2.5. Biochemical Profile

The C-reactive protein (CRP) was quantified using the latex technique [Reference Singer, Plotz, Pader and Elster18], and the quantification of cholesterol [Reference Allain, Poon, Chan, Richmond and Fu19, Reference Meiattini, Prencipe, Bardelli, Giannini and Tarli20], high-density lipoprotein (HDL) [Reference Warnick, Nauck and Rifai21], LDL [Reference Assmann, Jabs, Kohnert, Nolte and Schriewer22], triglycerides [Reference Bucolo and David23, Reference Fossati and Prencipe24], and glucose [Reference Trinder25] was carried out using enzymatic methods according to the indications of BioSystems S.A.

2.6. Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)

Haplotypes were inferred by the expectation maximization algorithm in the order rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034. The normalized LD (D′) and squared correlation of allele frequencies (r 2) were estimated using the available online SHEsis program [Reference Shi and He26]. We exclude haplotypes with a frequency less than 5%.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® version 22.0 and Excel® 2010. The data for continuous variables are presented as the mean and interquartile range, and differences between groups were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare discrete variables and to estimate the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Allele and genotype frequencies were obtained by direct counting. Dominant and recessive allele models were tested with χ2 test for each SNV. Under the dominant model, the heterozygous and homozygous genotypes of the minor allele were compared with the homozygous genotype of the major allele and, under the recessive model, were compared the heterozygous and homozygous genotypes of the major allele with the homozygous genotype of the minor allele. We performed a bivariate logistic regression where the dependent variable was the genetic models; however, the omnibus test was not significant (data not shown).

We performed a linear regression model to adjust the APOB serum levels by independent variables.

The odds ratio (OR) was the measure of association for genotype and allele frequencies and for risk factors with a confidence interval of 95%. The cutoff of significance was p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics

The mean age of individuals in ACSG and in individuals in CG was 64.25 and 57.76 years, respectively. In the group of cases, the frequency of ACS was 3.2 times higher in men than in women. STEMI was the most prevalent type of ACS (70%). Reinfarction was the reason for hospitalization in 17% of cases. High blood pressure was the main prevalent risk factor in both groups; however, risk factors are overrepresented in the ACS group (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Clinical and demographic characteristics.

CG (control group), ACSG (acute coronary syndrome group), T2DM2 (type 2 diabetes mellitus). p value of the Mann–Whitney test.

3.2. Biochemical Parameters

Except for glucose (125.4 mg/dL in CG and 144.15 mg/dL in ACSG), cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, and LDL levels were normal in both groups (Table 2).

TABLE 2: Biochemical parameters.

CG (control group), ACSG (acute coronary syndrome group), IQR (interquartile range), HDL (high-density lipoproteins), LDL (low-density lipoproteins), APOB (apolipoprotein B), CRP (C-reactive protein), CK (creatine kinase), CK-MB (creatine kinase MB). p value of the Mann–Whitney test.

3.3. Genotype and Allele Distribution

The genetic variants studied rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 were found in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, p≥0.13. No significant differences were found between groups for the allelic and genotype distributions of the rs1469513 variant. The rs673548 showed a risk contribution, in which the G/A genotype presented an OR of 1.53 (p=0.014), the A allele an OR of 1.33 (p=0.030), and the dominant model an OR of 1.50 (p=0.013). Carriers of genotype A/A of the rs676210 showed and increased risk (OR = 2.69, p < 0.001); furthermore, it was found that allele A confers a higher risk compared to allele G (OR = 1.72, p < 0.001) (Table 3), which is confirmed by the analysis under the dominant model (OR = 1.81, p < 0.001) (Table 4). Genotype T/T of the rs1042034 showed a protective contribution (OR = 0.50, p=0.037) (Table 3), and this was confirmed by the recessive inheritance model, through which we found that the presence of two T alleles confers protection (OR = 0.49, p=0.028) (Table 4).

TABLE 3: Genotype and allele distribution of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 in the APOB gene in CG and ACSG.

CG (control group), ACSG (acute coronary syndrome group), OR (odds ratio), CI (confidence interval).

TABLE 4: Differences between groups of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 by the inheritance model.

CG (control group), ACSG (acute coronary syndrome group), OR (odds ratio), CI (confidence interval).

3.4. Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium

We found linkage disequilibrium between the pair variants in the control group, rs1469513-rs673548 D′ = 0.69 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.11 (p < 0.0001), rs1469513-rs676210 D′ = 0.83 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.15 (p < 0.0001), rs1469513-rs1042034 D′ = 0.37 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.03 (p < 0.0001), rs673548-rs676210 D′ = 0.80 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.60 (p < 0.0001), rs673548-rs1042034 D′ = 0.53 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.26 (p < 0.0001), rs676210-rs1042034 D′ = 0.49 (p < 0.0001), r 2 = 0.21 (p < 0.0001), and compared the haplotype distribution between groups, and we found that the haplotype TAGT confers a risk 2.14 times higher (p < 0.001) (Table 5).

TABLE 5: Haplotype analysis of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 in the APOB gene in CG and ACSG.

CG (control group), ACSG (acute coronary syndrome group), CI (confidence interval), OR (odds ratio). Haplotype with frequency lower than 5% is not shown. Haplotype is represented by rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034.

3.5. APOB Serum Levels

APOB serum levels were found in the normal range in both groups (Table 2); however, under the recessive model in CG, a statistical difference was found in the rs1469513 (T/T + T/C:179 vs. C/C:149.7 mg/dl, p=0.0001).

3.6. The Dependent Variable

APOB serum levels were adjusted by independent variables age, sex, comorbidities, treatment, and biochemical parameters (cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, HDL, LDL), and cholesterol levels (β = 0.779, CI = 0.633–0.926, p≤0.001) and HDL (β = −0.597, CI = −0.935–0.258, p=0.001) showed a significative association with APOB serum levels (Table 6).

TABLE 6: APOB levels in ACSG adjusted by independent variables.

Dependent variable: APOB levels. Abbreviations: BMI (body mass index), HBP (high blood pressure), HDL (high-density lipoprotein), LDL (low-density lipoprotein).

4. Discussion

In our study, we found that in the ACS group, the average age was 64.25 years and that the male sex was predominant (76%); furthermore, high blood pressure was the main risk factor, being present in 70% of the individuals in the ACS group, and similar results have been found regarding RENASCA (National Registry of the Acute Coronary Syndrome) report, in which 75% of male were reported. In this cohort, the main risk factor was high blood pressure, present in 60.5% of individuals [Reference Borrayo-Sánchez, Rosas-Peralta and Ramírez-Arias27].

In the ACCESS study, which includes individuals from Mexico, it was found that 72% of the patients were men, according to our findings, and the most frequent risk factor was high blood pressure (62% of participants), but the average age of presentation was 62.1 years [Reference Martínez-Sánchez, Jerjes-Sánchez and Nicolau28]. The foregoing highlights age, sex, and other main risk factors associated with ACS.

STEMI, the severe entity of ACS, was the most frequent in our study, in contrast to the ACCESS study where the most frequent entities were UA and NSTEMI, which together made up 51.9% of cases compared to a 40.3% of cases in our study. The average age of presentation was 62.1 years, similar to our findings, where the average was 57.76 years in females and 64.25 in males [Reference Martínez-Sánchez, Jerjes-Sánchez and Nicolau28].

In the control group, we find higher percentages of individuals with diabetes (22.7%), high blood pressure (34.7%), dyslipidemia (20.3%), and smoking (20.7%); however, the percentages of overweight (23.7%), obesity (16.3%), and sedentary lifestyle (23%) were lower compared to what was reported in the National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT) carried out in 2018, where 8.6 million (10.3%) have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and 15.2 million (18.4%) a diagnosis of high blood pressure, registering an increase in the incidence from 50 years of age; therefore, in the age group 70 to 79 years, the proportion of individuals with this disease reaches 26.7%. The survey also reports 19.5% of individuals with elevated triglyceride and cholesterol levels, obesity in 36.1%, and overweight in 39.1%. Regarding physical activity, 29% of individuals in this age group are sedentary. It was found that tobacco consumption in Jalisco represents 12.6%, in Colima 12.3%, the Michoacán 12.7%, and in Nayarit 9.8%, and our study subjects come from these regions of the country [Reference Romero-Martínez, Shamah-Levy and Vielma-Orozco29].

Compared to the ACS group, in CG, we found higher levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, and APOB, a difference not seen in glucose or C-reactive protein. All other parameters were within normal range; 89% of individuals in the case group take antilipemic drugs regularly, which is a factor that favors the reduction of lipid levels in patients with ACS. Among the antilipemic drugs that are consumed are statins (reduce cholesterol levels) [Reference Chapman, Caslake, Packard and McTaggart30] and bezafibrate (reduce triglyceride levels) [Reference Goldenberg, Benderly and Goldbourt31]. Statins affect LDL and APOB levels, so it is possible to find lower levels of these parameters in our ACS group. Statins also decrease the number of circulating APOB particles by decreasing VLDL synthesis and thus the production of VLDL and LDL remnants; furthermore, they increase the clearance of these particles through the upregulation of LDL receptors in the liver [Reference Chapman, Assmann, Fruchart, Shepherd and Sirtori32].

Medication to lower lipid levels in the ACS group denotes that lipid control is not a factor that by itself prevents the occurrence of an ACS event, but that there will be other genetic and environmental risk factors that are causing the occurrence of this event; since we found individuals in CG with higher levels of blood lipids, despite being of similar age to individuals in the ACS group, they have not presented an ACS event.

In addition, it has been shown that lipid levels can be modified after an event of ACS, with a trend toward statistically significant decreases in total cholesterol, low-density lipid cholesterol and high-density lipid cholesterol, and a trend toward increased triglyceride levels [Reference Kumar, Kumar, Kumar, Shakoor and Rizwan33].

We found significative lower levels of HDL in the ACS group compared with CG (28.4 mg/dL vs. 41.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Low HDL levels have been associated with ACS for its antiatherogenic properties, and Cordero et al. found significantly lower levels in the ACS group (p < 0.01) of HDL (average 36.1 mg/dL) compared to patients with nonischemic chest pain (average, 44.5 mg/dL). An increase of 1 mg/dL in the levels of this lipoprotein has been found to decrease the risk of coronary heart disease by 2‐3% [Reference Cordero, Moreno-Arribas and Bertomeu-González34].

We documented a higher proportion of sedentary individuals in ACS; a known factor in reducing contributes to HDL levels. The impact of physical activity has been evidenced by Skoumas et al, and they found that physically active individuals have higher levels of HDL compared to sedentary (p < 0.5) [Reference Skoumas, Pitsavos and Panagiotakos35].

C-Reactive protein is a serum marker to assess cardiovascular risk. Healthy people have 2–4 times higher levels, which have been associated with increased risk; furthermore, it is an acute phase reactant that rises in the event of an infection or tissue damage [Reference Shah and Newby36]. Given this situation, in ACSG, we found considerably higher levels (26.18 mg/L). In CG, the mean C-reactive protein serum level was within normal range (4.2 mg/L).

Acute coronary syndrome is of multifactorial origin, and among the associated factors is APOB since it is considered a predictor for its occurrence [Reference Aditya and Bari37]. Variants in the APOB gene have been associated as protective or risk factors for ACS [Reference Szabo de Edelenyi, Goumidi and Bertrais38Reference Phillips, Goumidi and Bertrais40].

We included in the study two missense variants, rs676210 (NP_000375.3: p. Pro2739Leu) [Reference Sherry, Ward and Kholodov41] and rs1042034 (NP_000375.3: p. Ser4338Asn) [Reference Sherry, Ward and Kholodov41], and the intronic variants rs1469513 and rs673548. In the present investigation, no risk nor protection association was found with the rs1469513 (T > C) variant; however, in the Korean population, the lower allele has been associated with a higher risk of obesity (OR = 1.31, p=0.004) and higher levels of total cholesterol (p=0.001) and LDL (p=0.01) [Reference Zhou, Guo, Zhou, Zhou and Yu14]. According to the analysis performed in regSNP-intron, this variant does not affect the splicing site [Reference Lin, Hargreaves and Li42].

We found a risk association with genotype G/A in the rs673548 (OR = 1.53, p=0.014), and under the dominant model, we found that only one copy of allele A is necessary for an incremented risk (OR = 1.50, p=0.013). The risk has not been previously evaluated in ACS, although it has been related to ischemia, in ischemic stroke where G allele increases the risk 1.28 times (p=0.034) [Reference Zhou, Guo, Zhou, Zhou and Yu14]. According to the results obtained in regSNP-intron, this variant does not affect the splicing site [Reference Lin, Hargreaves and Li42].

The rs676210 variant appears to be an important risk factor in other populations as well as in our study. We found a risk association for A allele (OR 2.69, p < 0.001). Mäkelä et al. found that this variant is associated with LDL oxidation, a factor associated with atherosclerosis, but in contrast with our results, allele G confers 1.28 times higher risk of coronary disease (p=0.030). In addition, A allele in control subjects has shown higher serum lipid levels (p=0.01) [Reference Mäkelä, Seppälä and Hernesniemi9]. In contrast to these findings, in the Chinese population, it was found that carriers of the G/G genotype present an increased risk of ACS (OR = 1.93, p=0.005 compared to carriers of the A/A genotype) [Reference Liu, Yang and Han11]. Variants of rs676210 (p=0.005) and rs1042034 (p=0.009) have been found as a risk factor in Chinese population for hyperlipidemia, an important risk factor for atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease [Reference Gu, Han and Lan10]. According to the report obtained from the analysis in silico in the HOPE database, the variant, rs676210 (P2739L), the mutant residue is bigger than the wild-type residue. Prolines are known to be very rigid and therefore induce a special backbone conformation, which might be required at this position. The mutation can disturb this special conformation. The mutation is located in a region with known splice variants, described as p>L (in dbSNP: rs676210) [Reference Venselaar, Te Beek, Kuipers, Hekkelman and Vriend43]. The rs1042034 variant also was analyzed in a Framingham cohort and its descendant generation; in contrast to our results, they found that C/C genotype increases the risk of premature onset of cardiovascular diseases mainly in men (RR = 2.18, p = 4.5 × 10−5) [Reference Kulminski, Culminskaya and Arbeev44]; however, we found in our study population that the rs1042034 variant reduces the likelihood of having an ACS (OR = 0.05, p=0.037), and it should be noted that we found a marked difference in the presence of homozygotes for the T/T genotype between groups (ACS 5% vs. 9.7% CG), and the wild allele C is more frequent in the ACS group (25% ACS vs. 28.2% CG); this is the first time that this variant has been studied in our population. This variant confers a change (Ser > Asn) in the position 4338 of protein [Reference Segrest, Jones, De Loof and Dashti45], and in the α3 domain, this domain has reversible lipid affinity [Reference Segrest, Garber, Brouillette, Harvey and Anantharamaiah46Reference Segrest, De Loof, Dohlman, Brouillette and Anantharamaiah48], asparagine residue is bigger and less hydrophobic than serine. Hydrophobic interactions, either in the core of the protein or on the surface, will be lost. The wild-type residue is very conserved, but a few other residue types have been observed at this position too. The mutant residue was not among the other residue types observed at this position in other, homologous proteins. However, residues that have some properties in common with the mutated residue were observed. This means that in some rare cases, the mutation might occur without damaging the protein [Reference Venselaar, Te Beek, Kuipers, Hekkelman and Vriend43].

We analyze APOB levels according to the dominant and recessive inheritance models; in this analysis, we only found an association in the control group for the recessive model with the rs1469513 variant (p < 0.0001); therefore, carriers of two C alleles could have higher levels of APOB, and it could be expected that in the ACS group, the contribution of this allele to have higher levels of APOB is masked by lipid-lowering drugs. This finding has been observed for the first time in our population and has not been analyzed in any other.

We found linkage disequilibrium between the pair variants (p < 0.05), and we found that the haplotype TAGT confers a risk 2.14 times higher (p < 0.001).

Variant rs1469513 (T > C) has not been reported in linkage disequilibrium in previous studies; in this study, we found a high linkage disequilibrium with rs676210 (D′ = 0.83, p=0.0001, r 2 = 0.15, p=0.0001).

Variants rs676210 and rs1042034 have been found in linkage disequilibrium previously. A study reported that the haplotypes ATGGA and ATAGG formed by rs1042034, rs2163204, rs512535, rs676210, and rs679899 are a risk for hyperlipidemia (OR: 1.46, p=0.04, OR: 1.63, p=0.04) [Reference Gu, Han and Lan10].

In another study, the haplotype TGAG (rs1042034, rs676210, rs693, and rs673548 was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (OR = 1.583, p=0.031) [Reference Xiao, Sun and Zhang49].

Our findings demonstrate the impact that the genetic variants studied have on the risk of ACS in our population, which opens the possibility of conducting studies where their role in the response to drugs is analyzed, which would allow developing strategies for medicine personalized. As a limitation of our study, it is difficult to interpret the impact of the variants on the serum levels of APOB since the population that makes up the group of cases consumes drugs that can modify lipids and apolipoprotein levels, and longitudinal studies in individuals without medication could show the impact of genetic variants alone or the haplotype constructed with them on serum levels of APOB in individuals without medication.

In summary, our findings show that the risk of presenting an ACS event in the study population can be modified by the presence of the variants rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 and with TAGT haplotype.

5. Conclusions

Our findings support a significant risk association between rs673548 and rs676210 variants for ACS; meanwhile, rs1042034 could be considered protective factor in a western Mexican population. Also, in this population, haplotype TAGT may confer 2.14 times a higher risk.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during the present study are not publicly available because they are cited in the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

MAR and JRPG contributed to the design of the work. MAR, YVD, FCM, DEMF, BPR, LMVA, HEFS, EVA, JFMV, TGG, and JRPG helped with acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors approved the final version of this document.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by PROSNI 2019 and PROSNI 2020 granted to Padilla-Gutiérrez JR by the University of Guadalajara.

References

WHO, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds.Google Scholar
Hedayati, T., Yadav, N., and Khanagavi, J., “Non-ST-segment acute coronary syndromes,Cardiology Clinics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3752, 2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. J., “Coronary disease: the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes,Heart, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 361366, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, N. O. and Shelness, G. S., “Apolipoprotein B: mRNA editing, lipoprotein assembly, and presecretory degradation,Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 169193, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borén, J. and Williams, K. J., “The central role of arterial retention of cholesterol-rich apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a triumph of simplicity,Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 473483, 2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ference, B. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Graham, I. et al., “Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. a consensus statement from the european atherosclerosis society consensus panel,European Heart Journal, vol. 38, no. 32, pp. 24592472, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackhart, B. D., Ludwig, E. M., Pierotti, V. R. et al., “Structure of the human apolipoprotein B gene,Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 261, no. 33, pp. 1536415367, 1986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genest, J. J. Jr., Martin-Munley, S. S., McNamara, J. R. et al., “Familial lipoprotein disorders in patients with premature coronary artery disease,Circulation, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 20252033, 1992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäkelä, K. M., Seppälä, I., Hernesniemi, J. A. et al., “Genome-wide association study pinpoints a new functional apolipoprotein B variant influencing oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels but not cardiovascular events: atheroremo consortium,Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7381, 2013.Google Scholar
Gu, Q. L., Han, Y., Lan, Y. M. et al., “Association between polymorphisms in the APOB gene and hyperlipidemia in the Chinese Yugur population,Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 50, no. 11, Article ID e6613, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C., Yang, J., Han, W. et al., “Polymorphisms in apoB gene are associated with risk of myocardial infarction and serum apoB levels in a Chinese population,International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1657116577, 2015.Google ScholarPubMed
Doo, M., Won, S., and Kim, Y., “Association between the APOB rs1469513 polymorphism and obesity is modified by dietary fat intake in Koreans,Nutrition, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 653658, 2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Li, Y. et al., “Genetic association of the apoB and apoA1 gene polymorphisms with the risk for alcohol-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head,International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1133211339, 2015.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhou, F., Guo, T., Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., and Yu, D., “Variants in the APOB gene was associated with ischemic stroke susceptibility in chinese han male population,Oncotarget, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 22492254, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Características de las defunciones registradas en México durante enero a agosto de 2020, 2021, https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2021/EstSociodemo/DefuncionesRegistradas2020_Pnles.pdf.Google Scholar
Cannon, C. P., Brindis, R. G., Chaitman, B. R. et al., “2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease,Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65105, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcovina, S. M., Albers, J. J., Kennedy, H., Mei, J. V., Henderson, L. O., and Hannon, W. H., “International federation of clinical chemistry standardization project for measurements of apolipoproteins A-I and B. IV. comparability of apolipoprotein B values by use of international reference material,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 586592, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. M., Plotz, C. M., Pader, E., and Elster, S. K., “The latex-fixation test: III. Agglutination test for C-reactive protein and comparison with the capillary precipitin method,American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 611617, 1957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allain, C. C., Poon, L. S., Chan, C. S. G., Richmond, W., Fu, P. C., “Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 470475, 1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meiattini, F., Prencipe, L., Bardelli, F., Giannini, G., and Tarli, P., “The 4-hydroxybenzoate/4-aminophenazone chromogenic system used in the enzymic determination of serum cholesterol,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 21612165, 1978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnick, G. R., Nauck, M., and Rifai, N., “Evolution of methods for measurement of HDL-cholesterol: from ultracentrifugation to homogeneous assays,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 15791596, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assmann, G., Jabs, H.-U., Kohnert, U., Nolte, W., and Schriewer, H., “LDL-cholesterol determination in blood serum following precipitation of LDL with polyvinylsulfate,Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 7783, 1984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucolo, G. and David, H., “Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 476482, 1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fossati, P. and Prencipe, L., “Serum triglycerides determined colorimetrically with an enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 20772080, 1982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinder, P., “Determination of blood glucose using an oxidase-peroxidase system with a non-carcinogenic chromogen,Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 158161, 1969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, Y. Y. and He, L., “SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci,Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 9798, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borrayo-Sánchez, G., Rosas-Peralta, M., Ramírez-Arias, E. et al., “STEMI and NSTEMI: real-world study in Mexico (RENASCA),Archives of Medical Research, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 609619, 2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Sánchez, C., Jerjes-Sánchez, C., Nicolau, J. C. et al., “Acute coronary syndromes in Latin America: lessons from the ACCESS registry,Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 726737, 2016.Google ScholarPubMed
Romero-Martínez, M., Shamah-Levy, T., Vielma-Orozco, E. et al., “National health and nutrition survey 2018-19: methodology and perspectives,Salud publica de Mexico, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 917923, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M. J., Caslake, M., Packard, C., and McTaggart, F., “New dimension of statin action on ApoB atherogenicity,Clinical Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. I7I10, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, I., Benderly, M., and Goldbourt, U., “Update on the use of fibrates: focus on bezafibrate,Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 131141, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, M. J., Assmann, G., Fruchart, J. C., Shepherd, J., and Sirtori, C., “European consensus panel on HDL-C (2004). Raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role of nicotinic acid--a position paper developed by the european consensus panel on HDL-C,Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 12531268, 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, N., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., Shakoor, T., and Rizwan, A., “Lipid profile of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI),Cureus, vol. 11, no. 3, Article ID e4265, 2019.Google ScholarPubMed
Cordero, A., Moreno-Arribas, J., Bertomeu-González, V. et al., “Low levels of high-density lipoproteins cholesterol are independently associated with acute coronary heart disease in patients hospitalized for chest pain,Revista Española de Cardiología, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 319325, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoumas, J., Pitsavos, C., Panagiotakos, D. B. et al., “Physical activity, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipids levels, in men and women from the ATTICA study,Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, S. H. and Newby, L. K., “C-reactive protein: a novel marker of cardiovascular risk,Cardiology in Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 169179, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aditya, G. P. and Bari, M. A., “Apolipoprotein B versus non- high density lipoprotein cholesterol as a discriminating factor for acute coronary syndrome in young people,Mymensingh Medical Journal: Maryland Medical Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 458464, 2016.Google ScholarPubMed
Szabo de Edelenyi, F., Goumidi, L., Bertrais, S. et al., “Prediction of the metabolic syndrome status based on dietary and genetic parameters, using Random Forest,Genes & Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 173176, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teslovich, T. M., Musunuru, K., Smith, A. V. et al., “Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids,Nature, vol. 466, no. 7307, pp. 707713, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C. M., Goumidi, L., Bertrais, S. et al., “Gene-nutrient interactions and gender may modulate the association between ApoA1 and ApoB gene polymorphisms and metabolic syndrome risk,Atherosclerosis, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 408414, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherry, S. T., Ward, M. H., Kholodov, M. et al., “dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation,Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 308311, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H., Hargreaves, K. A., Li, R. et al., “RegSNPs-intron: a computational framework for predicting pathogenic impact of intronic single nucleotide variants,Genome Biology, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 254, 2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venselaar, H., Te Beek, T. A., Kuipers, R. K., Hekkelman, M. L., and Vriend, G., “Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces,BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 548, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulminski, A. M., Culminskaya, I., Arbeev, K. G. et al., “The role of lipid-related genes, aging-related processes, and environment in healthspan,Aging Cell, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 237246, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segrest, J. P., Jones, M. K., De Loof, H., and Dashti, N., “Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins,Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 13461367, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segrest, J. P., Garber, D. W., Brouillette, C. G., Harvey, S. C., and Anantharamaiah, G. M., “The amphipathic α helix: a multifunctional structural motif in plasma apolipoproteins,Lipoproteins, Apolipoproteins, and Lipases, vol. 45, pp. 303369, 1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segrest, J., Jones, M., De Loof, H., Brouillette, C., Venkatachalapathi, Y., and Anantharamaiah, G., “The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins: a review of secondary structure and function,Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 141166, 1992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segrest, J. P., De Loof, H., Dohlman, J. G., Brouillette, C. G., and Anantharamaiah, G. M., “Amphipathic helix motif: classes and properties,Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 103117, 1990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, R., Sun, S., Zhang, J. et al., “Association analysis of APO gene polymorphisms with ischemic stroke risk: a case-control study in a Chinese Han population,Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 36, pp. 6049660503, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

TABLE 1: Clinical and demographic characteristics.

Figure 1

TABLE 2: Biochemical parameters.

Figure 2

TABLE 3: Genotype and allele distribution of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 in the APOB gene in CG and ACSG.

Figure 3

TABLE 4: Differences between groups of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 by the inheritance model.

Figure 4

TABLE 5: Haplotype analysis of the rs1469513, rs673548, rs676210, and rs1042034 in the APOB gene in CG and ACSG.

Figure 5

TABLE 6: APOB levels in ACSG adjusted by independent variables.