Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:07:56.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives in prelabour rupture of the membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Siân Kerslake  and
Eboo Versi
Siân Kerslake*
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools. St Thomas' Hospital, LondonUK.
Eboo Versi
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools. St Thomas' Hospital, LondonUK.
*
Siâan Kerslake, UMDS Department of Obstertrics and Gynaecology, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Spontaneous rupture of the membranes usually accompanies the onset of labour, but precedes it in 10% of cases. Management, however, is not clear-cut and various treatments offer both risks and benefits to mother and infant in terms of intervention and nonintervention. Policies have changed over the last decade, moving towards a more conservative approach against a background of improved social conditions and antenatal care. Despite a wealth of literature documenting these changes, randomized controlled trials and unbiased reviews make up only a small proportion of the total number of papers surveyed. To base conclusions about the study of the management of prelabour rupture of the membranes upon statistically valid results, it is necessary to conduct a multicentre trial.

Type
Articles
Information
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Mead, PB. Management of the patient with premature rupture of membranes. Clin Perinatol 1980; 7: 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Taylor, ES, Morgan, RL, Bruns, PD, Drose, VE. Spontaneous premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 1341–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Lanier, LR, Scarbrough, RW, Fillingim, DW, Baker, RE. Incidence of maternal and fetal complications associated with rupture of the membranes before onset of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 398–404.Google Scholar
4Daikoku, NH, Kaltreider, F, Khouzami, VA, Spence, M, Johnson, JWC. Premature rupture of membranes and spontaneous preterm labor: maternal endometritis risks. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 13–20.Google ScholarPubMed
5Gunn, GC, Mishell, DR, Moreton, DG. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 160: 469–83.Google Scholar
6Beydoun, SN, Yasin, SY. Premature rupture of the membranes before 28 weeks: conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 471–79.Google Scholar
7Johnson, JWC, Daikoku, NH, Neibyl, JH, Johnson, TRB, Khouzami, VA, Witter, RF. Premature rupture of the membranes and prolonged latency. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 547–56.Google Scholar
8O'Herlihy, C, Turner, M. Prelabour spontaneous rupture of the membranes. In: Studd, J ed. Progress in obstetrics and gynaecology, volume nine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991: 99–110.Google Scholar
9Friedman, ML, McElin, TW. Diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes. Clinical study and review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 544–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Keirse, MJNC, Ohlsson, A, Treffers, PE. Prelabour rupture of the membranes preterm. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Kierse, MJNC eds. The effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989; 666–93.Google Scholar
11Robson, MS, Turner, MJ, Strong, JM, O’Herlihy, C. Is amniotic fluid quantitation of value in the diagnosis and conservative management of prelabour membranes rupture at term? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 324–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Rochelson, LB, Rodke, G, White, R, Bracero, L, Baker, DA. A rapid colorimetric AFP monoclonal antibody test for the diagnosis of preterm rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 163–66.Google Scholar
13Munson, LA, Graham, A, Koos, BJ, Valenzuela, GJ. Is there need for digital examination in patients with spontaneous rupture of the membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 562–63.Google Scholar
14Schutte, MF, Treffers, PE, Kloosterman, GJ, Soepatmi, S. Management of premature rupture of membranes: the risk of vaginal examination to the Infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Verloove-Vanhorick, SP, Verwey, RA, Brand, R, Bennebroek Gravenhorst, J, Keirse, MJNC, Ruys, JH. Neonatal mortality risk in relation to gestational age and birth weight. Lancet 1986; i: 55–57.Google Scholar
16Naeye, RL, Ross, SM. Amniotic fluid infection syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 9: 593–607.Google ScholarPubMed
17Thibeault, DW, Beatty, EC, Hall, RT, Bowen, SK, O’Neill, DH. Neonatal pulmonary hypoplasia with premature rupture of fetal membranes and oligohydramnios. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 273–77.Google Scholar
18Naeye, RL, Maisels, MJ, Lorenz, RP, Botti, JJ. The clinical significance of placental villous edema. Pediatrics 1983; 71: 588–94.Google Scholar
19Verloove-Vanhorick, SP, Verwey, RA, Ebeling, MCA, Brand, R, Ruys, JH. Mortality in very preterm and very low birth weight infants according to place of birth and level of care: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in the Netherlands. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 404–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Gibbs, RS, Castillo, MS, Rodgers, PJ. Management of acute chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 709–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Morales, WJ. The effect of chorioamnionitis on the development outcome of preterm infants at one year. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 183–86.Google Scholar
22Ohlsson, A, Wang, E. An analysis of antenatal tests to detect infection in premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 809–18.Google Scholar
23Fayez, JA, Hasan, AA, Jonas, HS, Miller, GL. Management of premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 17–21.Google Scholar
24Cotton, DB, Hill, LM, Strassner, HT, Platt, LD, Ledger, WJ. Use of amniocentesis in preterm gestation with ruptured membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 38–43.Google Scholar
25Sikorski, R, Milart, P, Kapec, E. Essential metals and immunoglobulin levels in women and neonates with PROM. Zentralbl Gynäkol 1991; 113: 99–103.Google Scholar
26Appelbaum, PC, Holloway, Y, Ross, SM, Dhupelia, I. The effect of amniotic fluid on bacterial growth in three population groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128: 868–71.Google Scholar
27Naeye, L, Ross, S. Coitus and chorioamnionitis: a prospective study. Early Hum Dev 1982; 6: 91–97.Google Scholar
28Yoder, PR, Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, Casteneda, YS, St Clair, PJ. A prospective, controlled study of maternal and perinatal outcome after intra-amniotic infection at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 695–701.Google Scholar
29Wang, E, Smail, F. Infection in pregnancy. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Kierse, MJNC eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989; 534–64.Google Scholar
30Anthony, BF, Okada, DM, Hobel, CJ. Epidemiology of the group B streptococcus: maternal and nosocomial sources for infant acquisitions. J Pediatr 1979; 95: 431–36.Google Scholar
31Siegel, JD, McCracken, GH. Sepsis neonatorum. N Engl J Med 1981; 304: 642–47.Google Scholar
32Gilstrap, LC, Leveno, KJ, Cox, SM, Burris, JS, Mashburn, M, Rosenfeld, CR. Intrapartum treatment of acute chorioamnionitis: impact on neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 579–83.Google Scholar
33Lim, DV, Morales, WJ, Walsh, AF. Lim Group B Strep. Broth and coagglutination for rapid identification of Group B streptococci in preterm pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 452–53.Google Scholar
34Reardon, EP, Noble, MA, Luther, ER, Wort, AJ, Bent, J, Swift, M. Evaluation of a rapid method of detection of vaginal group B streptococci in women in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 575–78.Google Scholar
35Wang, EE, Hammerberg, O, Lyn, P, Peng, HQ, Hunter, D, Richardson, H. Rapid detection of group B streptococcal carriage in parturient women using a modified starch serum medium. Clin Invest Med 1988; 11: 52–56.Google Scholar
36Goldstein, I, Romero, R, Merrill, S et al. Fetal body and breathing movements as predictors of intra-amniotic infection in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 363–68.Google Scholar
37Castle, BM, Turnbull, AC. The presence or absence of fetal breathing movements predicts the outcome of preterm labour. Lancet 1983; ii: 471–73.Google Scholar
38Crowley, P, Chalmers, I, Keirse, MJNC. The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 11–25.Google Scholar
39Dunlop, PDM, Crowley, PA, Lamont, RF, Hawkins, DF. Preterm ruptured membranes, no contractions. J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 7: 92–96.Google Scholar
40Levy, DL, Warsof, SL. Oral ritodrine and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 621–23.Google Scholar
41Ashworth, MF, Spooner, SF, Verkuyl, DAA, Waterman, R, Ashurst, HM. Failure to prevent preterm labour and delivery in twin pregnancy using prophylactic oral salbutamol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 878–82.Google Scholar
42Amon, E, Lewis, SV, Sibai, BM, Villar, MA, Arheart, KL. Ampicillin prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a prospective randomised study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 539–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Nelson, LH, Meis, PJ, Hatjis, CG, Ernest, JM, Dillard, R, Schey, HM. Premature rupture of membranes: a prospective, randomised evaluation of steroids, latent phase, and expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 55–58.Google ScholarPubMed
44Spinnato, JA, Shaver, DC, Bray, EM, Lipshitz, J. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes with fetal pulmonary maturity present: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 196–201.Google Scholar
45Johnson, JWC, Egerman, RS, Moorhead, J. Cases with membranes that ‘reseal’. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1024–32.Google Scholar
46Moberg, LJ, Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK. Fetal heart rate patterns and fetal distress in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 60–64.Google Scholar
47Gabbe, SG, Ettinger, BB, Freeman, RK, Martin, CB. Umbilical cord compression associated with amniotomy: laboratory observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 353–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Owen, J, Henson, BV, Hauth, JC. A prospective randomised study of saline solution amnioinfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1146–49.Google Scholar
49Nageotte, MP, Bertucci, L, Towers, CV, Lagrew, DL, Modanlou, H. Prophylactic amnioinfusion in pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 7: 677–80.Google Scholar
50Fisk, N, Ronderos-Dumit, D, Soliani, A, Nicolini, U, Vaughan, J, Rodeck, CH. Diagnostic and therapeutic transabdominal amnioinfusion in oligohydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 270–78.Google ScholarPubMed
51Wu, BT, Sun, LJ, Tang, LY. Intrapartum amnioinfusion for replacement of meconium-stained amniotic fluid to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Chin Med J 1991; 104: 221–24.Google Scholar
52Kappy, KA, Cetrulo, CL, Knuppel, RA et al. Premature rupture of the membranes at term: a comparison of induced and spontaneous labours. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 29–33.Google Scholar
53Kappy, KA, Cetrulo, CL, Knuppel, RA, Ingardia, CJ, Sbarra, AJ, Scerbo, JC, Mitchell, GW. Premature rupture of the membranes at term. A conservative approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 655–61.Google Scholar
54Duff, P, Huff, RW, Gibbs, RS. Management of premature rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 697–702.Google ScholarPubMed
55Conway, DI, Prediville, WJ, Morris, A, Speller, DCE, Stirrat, GM. Management of spontaneous rupture of the membranes in the absence of labor in primigravid women at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 947–51.Google Scholar
56Grant, J, Keirse, MJNC. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989; 1112–17.Google Scholar
57Morales, WJ, Lazar, AJ. Expectant management of rupture of the membranes. South Med J 1986; 79: 955–58.Google Scholar
58Hauth, JC, Cunningham, FG, Whalley, PJ. Early labour initiation with oral PGE2 after premature rupture of the membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 49: 523–26.Google Scholar
59Lange, AP, Secher, NJ, Neilsen, FH, Pederson, GT. Stimulation of labour in cases of premature rupture of the membranes at or near term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981; 60: 207–10.Google Scholar
60Westergaard, JG, Lange, AP, Pederson, GT, Secher, NJ. Use of oral oxytocics for stimulation of labour in cases of premature rupture of the membranes at term. A randomised comparative study of Prostaglandin E2 tablets and demoxytocin resoriblets. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 111–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Magos, AL, Noble, MCB, Wong Ten Yuen, A, Rodeck, CH. Controlled study comparing vaginal PGE2 pessaries with intravenous oxytocics for the stimulation of labour after spontaneous rupture of membranes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 726–31.Google Scholar
62Ekeman-Ordeberg, G, Uldbjerg, N, Ulmsten, U. Comparison of intravenous oxytocin and vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in women with unripe cervixes and premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 307–10.Google Scholar
63Wolf, RL, Olinsky, A. Prolonged rupture of fetal membranes and neonatal infections.S Afr Med J 1976; 50: 574–76.Google Scholar