Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:18:35.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noninvasive assessment of fetal anaemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Dick Oepkes  and
Humphrey HH Kanhai
Dick Oepkes*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
Humphrey HH Kanhai
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
*
Dr D Oepkes, Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Leiden, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In pregnancies complicated by severe red cell alloimmunization, fetal haemolytic anaemia can lead to intrauterine demise as early as 17 weeks' gestation. Intrauterine intraperitoneal blood transfusion, introduced by Liley in 1963, proved to be the first successful example of fetal therapy. The use of this complex procedure, involving X-ray guided puncture of the fetal peritoneal cavity, was limited to fetuses with a gestational age ranging from 24 to 33 weeks. When performed below 26 weeks, survival rates were as low as 16%. The need for intrauterine transfusion was mainly based on determination of bilirubin levels in amniotic fluid, and plotting the results in a three-zone chart devised by Liley. This chart was based on correlations of amniotic fluid bilirubin concentrations with the degree of neonatal anaemia, and ranged from 27 to 41 weeks' gestation. In the 1980s, with the introduction of ultrasound-guided intravascular transfusion, treatment became possible from 17–18 weeks' gestation onwards. Consequently, there was a need for diagnostic tests to assess the degree of anaemia in the second trimester fetus. The use of the Liley chart was shown to be unreliable in the prediction of disease severity before 27 weeks' gestation. Ultrasonographic detection of fetal hydrops in these pregnancies reliably indicates severe anaemia, but for reasons that are still unclear, a significant number of severely anaemic fetuses do not show ultrasonographic signs of hydrops. In 1988, Nicolaides et al studied the use of several ultrasonographic parameters to predict anaemia in nonhydropic fetuses. Their results were disappointing, and they concluded that the only reliable diagnostic test to assess the degree of fetal disease was fetal blood sampling.

Type
Articles
Information
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 143 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Liley, AW. Intrauterine transfusion of fetus in haemolytic disease. Br Med J 1963; 2: 1107.Google Scholar
2Bennebroek Gravenhorst, J, Kanhai, HH, Meerman, RH, Ruys, JH, Eernisse, JG, Stroes, TJ et al. Twenty-two years of intra-uterine intraperitoneal transfusions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 33: 71–77.Google Scholar
3Liley, AW. Liquor amnii analysis in the management of the pregnancy complicated by Rhesus sensitization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 1359–70.Google Scholar
4Bang, J, Bock, JE, Trolle, D. Ultrasound-guided fetal intravenous transfusion for severe rhesus haemolytic disease. Br Med J 1982; 284: 373–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Rodeck, CH, Nicolaides, KH, Warsof, SL, Fysh, WJ, Gamsu, HR, Kemp, JR. The management of severe rhesus isoimmunization by fetoscopic intravascular transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 769–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley-charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Nicolaides, KH, Fontanarosa, M, Gabbe, SG, Rodeck, CH. Failure of ultrasonographic parameters to predict the severity of fetal anemia in rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 920–26.Google Scholar
8Rodeck, CH, Santolaya, J, Nicolini, U.The fetus with immune hydrops. In: Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, eds. The unborn patient. Philadelphia: WBSaunders Company, 1993; 215–27.Google Scholar
9Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM. Transplacental fetal hemorrhage after amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 749–54.Google Scholar
10Daffos, F, Capella-Pavlovsky, M, Forestier, F. Fetal blood sampling during pregnancy with use of a needle guided by ultrasound: a study of 606 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 655–60.Google Scholar
11Pielet, BW, Socol, ML, MacGregor, SN, Ney, JA, Dooley, SL. Cordocentesis: an appraisal of risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1497–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Weiner, CP, Wenstrom, KD, Sipes, SL, Williamson, RA. Risk factors for cordocentesis and fetal intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1020–25.Google Scholar
13Donner, C, Simon, P, Karioun, A, Avni, F, Rodesch, F. Experience of a single team of operators in 891 diagnostic funipunctures. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 827–31.Google ScholarPubMed
14MacGregor, SN, Silver, RK, Sholl, JS. Enhanced sensitization after cordocentesis in a rhesus-isoimmunized pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 382–83.Google Scholar
15Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM, Peterson, LE, Harman, CR, Manning, FA, Menticoglou, SM. Fetomaternal hemorrhage following funipuncture: increase in severity of maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 839–43.Google Scholar
16Daffos, F. Fetal blood sampling. In: Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, eds. The unborn patient: prenatal diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1991: 75–83.Google Scholar
17Romero, R, Athanassiadis, AP, Inati, M. Fetal Blood Sampling. In: Fleischer, AC, Romero, R, Manning, F, Jeanty, P, James, AE Jr., eds. The principles and practice of ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1991: 455–73.Google Scholar
18Ghidini, A, Sepulveda, W, Lockwood, CJ, Romero, R. Complications of fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1339–44.Google Scholar
19Spinnato, JA. Hemolytic disease of the fetus: a plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 873–77.Google ScholarPubMed
20Fisk, NM, Bower, S. Fetal blood sampling in retreat. Br Med J 1993; 307: 143–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Ballantyne, JW. The Diseases and Deformities of the Foetus. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1892.Google Scholar
22Diamond, LK, Blackfan, KD, Baty, JM. Erythroblastosis fetalis and its association with universal oedema of the fetus, icterus gravis neonatorum, and anemia of the newborn. J Pediatr 1932; 1: 269.Google Scholar
23Darrow, RR. Icterus gravis (erythroblastosis) neonatorum: Examination of etiologic considerations. Arch Path 1938; 25: 378.Google Scholar
24Levine, P, Stetson, RE. Landmark article July 8, 1939. An unusual case of intra-group agglutination. By Philip Levine and Rufus E Stetson. JAMA 1984; 251: 1316–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Levine, P, Burnham, L, Katzin, EM, Vogel, P. The role of isoimmunization in the pathogenesis of erythroblastosis fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941; 42: 925–37.Google Scholar
26Kerr, JMM, MacKay, WG. The diagnosis of placenta previa with special reference to employment of X-rays for this purpose. Edinb Med J 1933; 40: 21.Google Scholar
27Allen, FH, Diamond, LK, Jones, AR. Erythroblastosis fetalis. IX. Problems of stillbirth. New Engl J Med 1954; 251: 453.Google Scholar
28Bevis, DCA. Blood pigments in haemolytic disease of the newborn. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1956; 63: 68–75.Google Scholar
29Savignac, EM. The prenatal roentgen diagnosis of fetal hydrops. Am J Roentgenol 1958; 80: 673.Google ScholarPubMed
30Queenan, JT. Modern management of the Rh problem. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.Google Scholar
31Wiesenhaan, PF. Foetografie [dissertation]. Leiden: University of Leiden, 1970.Google Scholar
32Gordon, HG. The diagnosis of hydrops fetalis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1971; 14: 548.Google Scholar
33Donald, I, MacVicar, J, Brown, TG. Investigation of the abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound. Lancet 1958; 1: 1188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Sunden, B. On the diagnostic value of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1964; 43(suppl): 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Gottesfeld, KR, Thompson, HE, Holmes, JH, Taylor, ES. Ultrasonic placentography - a new method for placental localization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 96: 538–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Holländer, HJ, Mast, H. Intrauterine Dickenmessungen der Plazenta mittels Ultraschall bei normalen Schwangerschaften und bei Rh-Inkompatibilitat. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk 1968; 28: 662.Google Scholar
37Hofman, D, Holländer, HJ. Die intrauterine diagnostik des hydrops fetalis universalis mittels ultraschall. Zentralbl Gynaekol 1968; 90; 667.Google Scholar
38Langezaal, CFM. Echografie in de verloskunde [dissertation]. Leiden: University of Leiden, 1971.Google Scholar
39Jones, M. Ultrasonic B scanning in rhesus incompatibility. J Clin Ultrasound 1974; 2: 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Ghorashi, B, Gottesfield, KR. Recognition of the hydropic fetus by gray scale ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1976; 4: 193–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Bowman, JM. The management of Rh-isoimmunization. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 1–16.Google Scholar
42Hobbins, JC, Davis, CD, Webster, J. A new technique utilizing ultrasound to aid in intrauterine transfusion. JCU 1976; 4: 135–7.Google Scholar
43Hansmann, M, Lang, N. Intrauterine transfusion unter Ultraschallkontrolle. Klin Wochenschr 1972; 50: 930.Google Scholar
44Harman, CR. Specialized applications of obstetric ultrasound: management of the alloimmunized pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 1985; 9: 184–97.Google Scholar
45Barss, VA, Benacerraf, BR, Frigoletto, FD, Greene, MF, Penso, C, Saltzman, DH et al. Management of isoimmunized pregnancy by use of intravascular techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 932–7.Google Scholar
46Grannum, PAT, Copel, JA, Moya, FR, Scioscia, AL, Robert, JA, Winn, HN et al. The reversal of hydrops fetalis by intravascular intrauterine transfusion in severe isoimmune fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 914–9.Google Scholar
47Harman, CR, Bowman, JM, Manning, FA, Menticoglou, SM. Intrauterine transfusion - intraperitoneal versus intravascular approach: a case-control comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1053–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Weiner, CP, Pelzer, GD, Heilskov, J, Wenstrom, KD, Williamson, RA. The effect of intravascular transfusion on umbilical venous pressure in anemic fetuses with and without hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1498–501.Google Scholar
49Van Huisseling, H, Hasaart, THM, Muijsers, GJJM, De Haan, J. Umbilical artery pulsatility index and placental vascular resistance during acute hypoxemia in fetal lambs. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991; 31: 61–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Moise, KJ Jr., Carpenter, RJ Jr., Hesketh, DE. Do abnormal Starling forces cause fetal hydrops in red blood cell alloimmunization? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 907–12.Google Scholar
51Fumia, FD, Edelstone, DI, Holzman, IR. Blood flow and oxygen delivery to fetal organs as functions of fetal hematocrit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 274–82.Google Scholar
52Edelstone, DI, Caine, ME, Fumia, FD. Relationship of fetal oxygen consumption and acid-base balance to fetal hematocrit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 844–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Edelstone, DI, Darby, MJ, Bass, K, Miller, K. Effects of reductions in hemoglobin-oxygen affinity and hematocrit level on oxygen consumption and acid-base state in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 820–8.Google Scholar
54Nicolaides, KH. Studies on fetal physiology and pathophysiology in rhesus disease. Semin Perinatol 1989; 13: 328–37.Google Scholar
55Barnes, SE. Hydrops fetalis. Mol Aspects Med 1977; 1: 244.Google Scholar
56Darby, MJ, Edelstone, DI, Bass, K, Miller, K. Effects of fetal anemia on PO2 difference between uterine venous and umbilical venous blood. Am J Physiol 1991; 260: H276–81.Google Scholar
57Buscaglia, M, Ferrazzi, E, Zuliani, G, Caccamo, ML, Pardi, G. Ultrasound contributions to the management of the severely isoimmunized fetus. J Perinat Med 1986; 14: 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Nicolaides, KH, Warenski, JC, Rodeck, CH. The relationship of fetal plasma protein concentration and hemoglobin level to the development of hydrops in rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Saltzman, DH, Frigoletto, FD, Harlow, BL, Barss, VA, Benacerraf, BR. Sonographic evaluation of hydrops fetalis. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 71: 106–11.Google Scholar
60DeVore, GR, Donnerstein, RL, Kleinman, CS, Platt, LD, Hobbins, JC. Fetal echocardiography II. The diagnosis and significance of a pericardial effusion in a fetus using real-time directed M-mode ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 693–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Jeanty, P, Romero, R, Hobbins, JC. Fetal pericardial fluid: A normal finding of the second half of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 529–32.Google Scholar
62Di Salvo, DN, Brown, DL, Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Frates, MC. Clinical significance of isolated fetal pericardial effusion. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 291–3.Google Scholar
63Benacerraf, BR, Frigoletto, FD Jr.. Sonographic sign for the detection of early fetal ascites in the management of severe isoimmune disease without intrauterine transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 1039–41.Google Scholar
64Weiner, S, Bolognese, RJ, Librizzi, RJ. Ultrasound in the evalution and management of the isoimmunized pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Hashimoto, BE, Filly, RA, Callen, PW. Sonographic detection of fetal intraperitoneal fluid. J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5: 203–4.Google Scholar
66Wladimiroff, JW, Jahoda, MCJ. Real time scanning and transabdominal fetal blood sampling. Lancet 1977; 1: 593–7.Google Scholar
67Rodeck, CH, Campbell, S. Umbilical cord insertion as a source of pure fetal blood for prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 1979; 1: 1244.Google Scholar
68Chitkara, U, Wilkins, I, Lynch, L, Mehalek, K, Berkowitz, RL. The role of sonography in assessing severity of fetal anemia in Rh- and Kell-isoimmunized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 393–8.Google Scholar
69Nicolaides, KH, Soothill, PW, Clewell, WH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Campbell, S. Fetal haemoglobin measurement in the assessment of red cell isoimmunization. Lancet 1988; 1: 1073–5.Google Scholar
70Plecas, DV, Chitkara, U, Berkowitz, GS, Lapinski, RH, Alvarez, M, Berkowitz, RL. Intrauterine intravascular transfusion for severe erythroblastosis fetalis: how much to transfuse? Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 965–9.Google Scholar
71MacKenzie, IZ, Bowell, PJ, Castle, BM, Selinger, M, Ferguson, JF. Serial fetal blood sampling for the management of pregnancies complicated by severe rhesus (D) isoimmunization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 753–8.Google Scholar
72Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, Sipes, SL, Grant, SS, Widness, JA. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis. I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73Hoddick, WK, Mahony, BS, Callen, PW, Filly, RA. Placental thickness. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 479–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Dombrowski, MP, Wolfe, HM, Saleh, A, Evans, MI, O’Brien, J. The sonographically thick placenta: a predictor of increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 252–55.Google Scholar
75Hill, LM. Abnormalities of amniotic fluid. In: Nyberg, DA, Mahoney, BS, Pretorius, DH, eds. Diagnostic ultrasound of fetal anomalies. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1990: 38–66.Google Scholar
76Powell, TL, Brace, RA. Elevated fetal plasma lactate produces polyhydramnios in the sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1595–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77Queenan, JT, Gadow, EC. Polyhydramnios: Chronic versus acute. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 108: 349–55.Google Scholar
78Phelan, JP, Ohn, OM, Smith, CV, Ruhterford, SE, Anderson, E. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 603–4.Google Scholar
79Moore, TR. Superiority of the four-quadrant sum over the single-deepest-pocket technique in ultrasonographic identification of abnormal amniotic fluid volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 762–7.Google Scholar
80Moore, TR, Cayle, JE. The amńiotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1168–73.Google Scholar
81DeVore, GR, Mayden, K, Tortora, M, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. Dilation of the fetal umbilical vein in rhesus hemolytic anemia: a predictor of severe disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 464–6.Google Scholar
82Jouppila, P, Kirkinen, P. Umbilical vein blood flow in the human fetus in cases of maternal and fetal anemia and uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Med Biol 1984; 10: 365–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83Vintzileos, AM, Campbell, WA, Storlazzi, E, Mirochnick, MH, Escoto, DT, Nochimson, DJ. Fetal liver ultrasound measurements in isoimmunized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 162–7.Google Scholar
84Witter, FR, Graham, D. The utility of ultrasonically measured umbilical vein diameters in isoimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 225–6.Google Scholar
85Reece, EA, Gabrielli, S, Abdalla, M, O’Connor, TZ, Hobbins, JC. Reassessment of the utility of fetal umbilical vein diameter in the management of isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 937–8.Google Scholar
86Vintzileos, AM, Neckles, S, Campbell, WA, Andreoli, JW Jr., Kaplan, BM, Nochimson, DJ. Fetal liver ultrasound measurements during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 477–80.Google Scholar
87Roberts, AB, Mitchell, JM, Pattison, NS. Fetal liver length in normal and isoimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 42–46.Google Scholar
88Oepkes, D, Meerman, RH, Vandenbussche, FPHA, Kamp IL, van, Kok, FG, Kanhai, HHH. Ultrasonographic fetal spleen measurements in red cell alloimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 121–8.Google Scholar
89Sadovsky, E, Laufer, N, Beyth, Y. The role of fetal movements assessment in cases of severe Rh isoimmunized patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58: 313–5.Google Scholar
90Frigoletto, FD, Greene, MF, Benacerraf, BR, Barss, VA, Saltzman, DH. Ultrasonographic fetal surveillance in the management of the isoimmunized pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 430–2.Google Scholar
91Parer, JT. Severe Rh isoimmunization-current methods of in utero diagnosis and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1323–9.Google Scholar
92Manning, FA, Platt, LD, Sipos, L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 787–95.Google Scholar
93Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Lange, IR, Harman, CR, Chamberlain, PF. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94Nicolaides, KH, Sadovsky, G, Cetin, E. Fetal heart rate patterns in red blood cell isoimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 351–6.Google Scholar
95Kariniemi, V. Fetal anemia and heart rate patterns. J Perinat Med 1982; 10: 167–73.Google Scholar
96Berkowitz, RL. Intrauterine transfusion, 1980: An update. Clin Perinatol 1980; 7: 285–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97Romanini, C, Moneta, E, Bellati, U, Oliva, GC, Arduini, D, Gaglione, R et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rhythm. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1980; 9: 455–60.Google Scholar
98Verma, U, Tejani, N, Weiss, RR, Catterjee, S, Halitsky, V. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern in severe RH disease. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 666–9.Google Scholar
99Visser, GHA. Ante partum sinusoidal and decelerative heart rate patterns in Rh disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 538–44.Google Scholar
100Sadovsky, G, Visser, GH, Nicolaides, KH. Heart rate patterns in fetal anemia. Fetal Ther 1988; 3: 216–23.Google Scholar
101Economides, DL, Selinger, M, Ferguson, J, Bowell, PJ, Dawes, GS, MacKenzie, IZ. Computerized measurement of heart rate variation in fetal anemia caused by rhesus alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 689–93.Google Scholar
102Griffin, D, Cohen-Overbeek, T, Campbell, S. Fetal and uteroplacental blood flow. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 10: 565–602.Google Scholar
103Kirkinen, P, Jouppila, P. Umbilical vein blood flow in rhesus-isoimmunization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 640–3.Google Scholar
104Kirkinen, P, Jouppila, P, Eik Nes, S. Umbilical venous flow as indicator of fetal anaemia. Lancet 1981; 1: 1004–1005.Google Scholar
105Gill, RW, Kossoff, G, Warren, PS, Garrett, WJ. Umbilical venous flow in normal and complicated pregnancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 1984; 10: 349–63.Google Scholar
106Gill, RW, Kossoff, G, Trudinger, BJ, Warren, PS. Flow velocity in the venous return from the placenta. Excerpta Medica Ics 1980; 498: 229–32.Google Scholar
107Stiller, RJ, Ashmead, GG, Paul, D, Weiner, S. Fetal blood flow measurements in severe rhesus isoimmunization. A case report. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 453–55.Google Scholar
108Rightmire, DA, Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Campbell, S. Fetal blood velocities in Rh isoimmunization: relationship to gestational age and to fetal hematocrit. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 233–6.Google ScholarPubMed
109Jouppila, P, Kirkinen, P, Puukka, R. Correlation between umbilical vein blood flow and umbilical blood viscosity in normal and complicated pregnancies. Arch Gynecol 1986; 237: 191–7.Google Scholar
110Favre, Y, Vetter, K, Huch, R, Huch, A. Doppler flow velocity measurement of the aorta when there is incompatibility of blood between the mother and the fetus. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1989; 18: 740–6.Google Scholar
111Copel, JA, Grannum, PA, Belanger, K, Green, J, Hobbins, JC. Pulsed Doppler flow-velocity waveforms before and after intrauterine intravascular transfusion for severe erythroblastosis fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 768–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
112Nicolaides, KH, Bilardo, CM, Campbell, S. Prediction of fetal anemia by measurement of the mean blood velocity in the fetal aorta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 209–12.Google Scholar
113Bilardo, CM, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler studies in red cell isoimmunization. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1989; 32: 719–27.Google Scholar
114Vyas, S, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler examination of the middle cerebral artery in anemic fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1066–68.Google Scholar
115Kanzaki, T, Chiba, Y. Evaluation of the preload condition of the fetus by inferior vena caval blood flow pattern. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 168–74.Google Scholar
116Visser, GHA, De Smedt, MCH, Meijboom, EJ. Altered fetal cardiac flow patterns in pure red cell anemia (the Blackfan-Diamond syndrome). Prenat Diagn 1988; 8: 525–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
117Copel, JA, Grannum, PA, Green, JJ, Belanger, K, Hanna, N, Jaffe, CC et al. Fetal cardiac output in the isoimmunized pregnancy: a pulsed Doppler-echocardiographic study of patients undergoing intravascular intrauterine transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 361–5.Google Scholar
118Rizzo, G, Nicolaides, KH, Arduini, D, Campbell, S. Effects of intravascular fetal blood transfusion on fetal intracardiac Doppler velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1231–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
119Barss, VA, Doubilet, PM, St.John Sutton, M, Cartier, MS, Frigoletto, FD. Cardiac output in a fetus with erythroblastosis fetalis: assessment using pulsed Doppler. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 442–4.Google Scholar
120Mari, G, Moise, KJ Jr., Deter, RL, Kirshon, B, Stefos, T, Carpenter, RJ Jr.. Flow velocity waveforms of the vascular system in the anemic fetus before and after intravascular transfusion for severe red blood cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1060–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
121Copel, JA, Grannum, PA, Green, JJ, Belanger, K, Hobbins, JC. Pulsed Doppler flow-velocity waveforms in the prediction of fetal hematocrit of the severely isoimmunized pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 341–44.Google Scholar
122Hanretty, KP, Whittle, MJ, Gilmore, DH, McNay, MB, Howie, CA, Rubin, PC. The effect of intravascular transfusion for rhesus haemolytic disease on umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 960–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
123Warren, PS, Gill, RW, Fisher, CC. Doppler flow studies in rhesus isoimmunization. Semin Perinatol 1987; 11: 375–78.Google Scholar
124Mari, G, Adrignolo, A, Ahuhamad, AZ, Pirhonen, J, Jones, DC, Ludomirsky, A et al. The diagnosis of fetal anemia with Doppler ultrasound in the pregnancy complicated by Rh-isoimmunization [abstract]. J Matern Fetal Invest 1994; 4(Supp.): S10.Google Scholar
125Hecher, K, Snijders, R, Campbell, S, Nicolaides, K. Fetal venous, arterial and intracardiac blood flows in red blood cell isoimmunization. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 122–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
126Kiserud, T, Eik-Nes, SH, Blass, HGK, Hellevik, LR. Ultrasonographic velocimetry of the fetal ductus venosus. Lancet 1991; 338: 1412–14.Google Scholar
127DeVore, GR, Horenstein, J. Ductus venosus index: a method for evaluating right ventricular preload in the second-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 338–42.Google Scholar
128Oepkes, D, Vandenbussche, FP, van Bel, F, Kanhai, HHH. Fetal ductus venosus blood flow velocities before and after transfusion in red-cell alloimmunized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 237–41.Google ScholarPubMed
129Oepkes, D, Helbig, A, Meerman, RH, Kanhai, HHH. Ductus venosus reversed flow: a sign of fetal cardiac failure [abstract]. J Matern Fetal Invest 1994; 4(Supp.): S13.Google Scholar
130Oepkes, D, Brand, R, Vandenbussche, FPHA, Meerman, RH, Kanhai, HHH. The use of ultrasonography and Doppler in the prediction of fetal haemolytic anaemia: a multivariate analysis. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 101: 680–84.Google Scholar