Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

THE LESS-INVASIVE PERINATAL AUTOPSY: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

  • O J ARTHURS (a1) (a2), A M TAYLOR (a3) and N J SEBIRE (a4) (a2)

Extract

Full autopsy. A combination of external examination, radiological investigations, evisceration, dissection and subsequent full organ examination with detailed histological evaluation. This is the current “gold standard” of care against which other approaches are compared.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Professor N J Sebire, Department of Paediatric Pathology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK. Email: neil.sebire@gosh.nhs.uk

References

Hide All
1Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Perinatal Mortality 2007: United Kingdom, London 2009. http://www.publichealth.hscni.net/publications/perinatal-mortality-2007. Accessed on 18 February 2013.
2Kennedy, I. Learning the lessons: The Department of Health's Response to the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry Report (Kennedy report). Department of Health, 2001. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4002859. Accessed on 18February 2012.
3Redfern, M, Keeling, JW, Powell, E. The Royal Liverpool Children's inquiry report. London: HMSO, 2001. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111202162649/http://www.rlcinquiry.org.uk. Accessed on 18 February 2012.
4The Chief Medical Officer: The removal, retention and use of human organs and tissues from post mortem examination. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4064942. Accessed on 18 February 2012.
5BBC News, 21 April 2009. Coroners get MRI body scan option. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8009767.stm. Accessed on 18 February 2012.
6Breeze, ACG. Is perinatal post-mortem MRI ready for routine clinical practice? Fetal Maternal Med Rev 2013; 24: 3843.
7Thayyil, S, Chandrasekaran, M, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Skordis-Worrall, J, Bennett-Britton, I, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75:e1428.
8Vogt, C, Blaas, HG, Salvesen, , Eik-Nes, SH. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 666–72.
9Roberts, IS, Benamore, RE, Benbow, EW, Lee, SH, Harris, JN, Jackson, A, et al.Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 2012; 379: 136–42.
10Thayyil, S, Sebire, NJ, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Chong, WK, Olsen, O, et al.for the MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013 16 May. pii: S0140-6736(13)60134-8. [Epub ahead of print].
11Shojania, KG, Burton, EC, McDonald, KM, Goldman, L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–56.
12Weber, MA, Pryce, JW, Ashworth, MT, Malone, M, Sebire, NJ. Histological examination in sudden unexpected death in infancy: evidence base for histological sampling. J Clin Pathol 2012; 65: 5863.
13Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, Mushtaq, I, Taylor, A, Chitty, LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513–18.
14Sebire, NJ. Towards the minimally invasive autopsy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 865–7.
15Cannie, M, Votino, C, Moerman, P, Vanheste, R, Segers, V, Van Berkel, K, et al.Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 659–65.
16Ben-Sasi, K, Chitty, LS, Franck, LS, Thayyil, S, Judge-Kronis, L, Taylor, AM, et al.Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenatal Diagnosis 2013; 33: 307–12
17Rankin, J, Wright, C, Lind, T. Cross sectional survey of parents’ experience and views of the post mortem examination. BMJ 2002; 324: 816–18.
18Breeze, AC, Jessop, FA, Whitehead, AL, Set, PA, Berman, L, Hackett, GA, et al.Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 2008; 452: 201–7.
19Thayyil, S, Schievano, S, Robertson, NJ, Jones, R, Chitty, LS, Sebire, NJ, et al; MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative group. A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 321–6.
20Votino, C, Verhoye, M, Segers, V, Cannie, M, Bessieres, B, Cos, T, et al.Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 673–8.
21Prodhomme, O, Seguret, F, Martrille, L, Pidoux, O, Cambonie, G, Couture, A, et al.Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F4348.
22Thayyil, S, Cleary, JO, Sebire, NJ, Scott, RJ, Chong, K, Gunny, R, et al.Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 2009; 374: 467–75.
23Votino, C, Cannie, M, Segers, V, Dobrescu, O, Dessy, H, Gallo, V, et al.Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 679–84.
24Votino, C, Jani, J, Verhoye, M, Bessieres, B, Fierens, Y, Segers, V, et al.Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks’ gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4 T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 437–44.
25de Crespigny, A, Bou-Reslan, H, Nishimura, MC, Phillips, H, Carano, RA, D'Arceuil, HE. 3D micro-CT imaging of the postmortem brain. Neurosci Methods 2008; 171: 207–13.
26Stephenson, RS, Boyett, MR, Hart, G, Nikolaidou, T, Cai, X, Corno, AF, et al.Contrast enhanced micro-computed tomography resolves the 3-dimensional morphology of the cardiac conduction system in mammalian hearts. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e35299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035299.
27Schievano, S, Migliavacca, F, Coats, L, Khambadkone, S, Carminati, M, Wilson, N, et al.Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology 2007; 242: 490–97.
28Schievano, S, Sebire, NJ, Robertson, NJ, Taylor, AM, Thayyil, S. Reconstruction of fetal and infant anatomy using rapid prototyping of post-mortem MR images. Insights Imaging 2010; 1: 281–6.
29Weis, S, Llenos, IC, Dulay, JR, Elashoff, M, Martínez-Murillo, F, Miller, CL. Quality control for microarray analysis of human brain samples: the impact of postmortem factors, RNA characteristics, and histopathology. J Neurosci Methods 2007; 165: 198209.
30Magdeldin, S, Yamamoto, T. Toward deciphering proteomes of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Proteomics 2012; 12: 1045–58. doi:10.1002/pmic.201100550.
31Bohndiek, SE, Brindle, KM. Imaging and ‘omic’ methods for the molecular diagnosis of cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2010; 10: 417–34.
32Flenady, V, Middleton, P, Smith, GC, Duke, W, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY, et al.Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet 2011; 377: 1703–17.
33Rutty, G. Can cross-sectional imaging as an adjunct and/or alternative to the invasive autopsy be implemented within the NHS? Report from the NHS implementation sub-group of the Department of Health Post Mortem, Forensic and Disaster Imaging Group (PMFDI). October 2012. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/emfpu/national-documents-1. Accessed on 18 February 2013.
34Maskell, G, Wells, M. RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. G129. London: The Royal College of Pathologist; 2012.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

THE LESS-INVASIVE PERINATAL AUTOPSY: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

  • O J ARTHURS (a1) (a2), A M TAYLOR (a3) and N J SEBIRE (a4) (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.