6Breeze, ACG. Is perinatal post-mortem MRI ready for routine clinical practice? Fetal Maternal Med Rev 2013; 24: 38–43.
7Thayyil, S, Chandrasekaran, M, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Skordis-Worrall, J, Bennett-Britton, I, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75:e142–8.
8Vogt, C, Blaas, HG, Salvesen, KÅ, Eik-Nes, SH. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 666–72.
9Roberts, IS, Benamore, RE, Benbow, EW, Lee, SH, Harris, JN, Jackson, A, et al.Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 2012; 379: 136–42.
10Thayyil, S, Sebire, NJ, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Chong, WK, Olsen, O, et al.for the MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013 16 May. pii: S0140-6736(13)60134-8. [Epub ahead of print].
11Shojania, KG, Burton, EC, McDonald, KM, Goldman, L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–56.
12Weber, MA, Pryce, JW, Ashworth, MT, Malone, M, Sebire, NJ. Histological examination in sudden unexpected death in infancy: evidence base for histological sampling. J Clin Pathol 2012; 65: 58–63.
13Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, Mushtaq, I, Taylor, A, Chitty, LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513–18.
14Sebire, NJ. Towards the minimally invasive autopsy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 865–7.
15Cannie, M, Votino, C, Moerman, P, Vanheste, R, Segers, V, Van Berkel, K, et al.Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 659–65.
16Ben-Sasi, K, Chitty, LS, Franck, LS, Thayyil, S, Judge-Kronis, L, Taylor, AM, et al.Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenatal Diagnosis 2013; 33: 307–12
17Rankin, J, Wright, C, Lind, T. Cross sectional survey of parents’ experience and views of the post mortem examination. BMJ 2002; 324: 816–18.
18Breeze, AC, Jessop, FA, Whitehead, AL, Set, PA, Berman, L, Hackett, GA, et al.Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 2008; 452: 201–7.
19Thayyil, S, Schievano, S, Robertson, NJ, Jones, R, Chitty, LS, Sebire, NJ, et al; MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative group. A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 321–6.
20Votino, C, Verhoye, M, Segers, V, Cannie, M, Bessieres, B, Cos, T, et al.Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 673–8.
21Prodhomme, O, Seguret, F, Martrille, L, Pidoux, O, Cambonie, G, Couture, A, et al.Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F434–8.
22Thayyil, S, Cleary, JO, Sebire, NJ, Scott, RJ, Chong, K, Gunny, R, et al.Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 2009; 374: 467–75.
23Votino, C, Cannie, M, Segers, V, Dobrescu, O, Dessy, H, Gallo, V, et al.Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 679–84.
24Votino, C, Jani, J, Verhoye, M, Bessieres, B, Fierens, Y, Segers, V, et al.Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks’ gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4 T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 437–44.
25de Crespigny, A, Bou-Reslan, H, Nishimura, MC, Phillips, H, Carano, RA, D'Arceuil, HE. 3D micro-CT imaging of the postmortem brain. Neurosci Methods 2008; 171: 207–13.
26Stephenson, RS, Boyett, MR, Hart, G, Nikolaidou, T, Cai, X, Corno, AF, et al.Contrast enhanced micro-computed tomography resolves the 3-dimensional morphology of the cardiac conduction system in mammalian hearts. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e35299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035299.
27Schievano, S, Migliavacca, F, Coats, L, Khambadkone, S, Carminati, M, Wilson, N, et al.Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology 2007; 242: 490–97.
28Schievano, S, Sebire, NJ, Robertson, NJ, Taylor, AM, Thayyil, S. Reconstruction of fetal and infant anatomy using rapid prototyping of post-mortem MR images. Insights Imaging 2010; 1: 281–6.
29Weis, S, Llenos, IC, Dulay, JR, Elashoff, M, Martínez-Murillo, F, Miller, CL. Quality control for microarray analysis of human brain samples: the impact of postmortem factors, RNA characteristics, and histopathology. J Neurosci Methods 2007; 165: 198–209.
30Magdeldin, S, Yamamoto, T. Toward deciphering proteomes of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Proteomics 2012; 12: 1045–58. doi:10.1002/pmic.201100550.
31Bohndiek, SE, Brindle, KM. Imaging and ‘omic’ methods for the molecular diagnosis of cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2010; 10: 417–34.
32Flenady, V, Middleton, P, Smith, GC, Duke, W, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY, et al.Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet 2011; 377: 1703–17.
33Rutty, G. Can cross-sectional imaging as an adjunct and/or alternative to the invasive autopsy be implemented within the NHS? Report from the NHS implementation sub-group of the Department of Health Post Mortem, Forensic and Disaster Imaging Group (PMFDI). October 2012. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/emfpu/national-documents-1. Accessed on 18 February 2013.
34Maskell, G, Wells, M. RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. G129. London: The Royal College of Pathologist; 2012.