Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:30:38.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shoulder dystocia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

GSH Yeo*
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Kandang Kerbau Hospital, Singapore.
TC Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Kandang Kerbau Hospital, Singapore.
*
Dr GSH Yeo, Senior Consultant and Head, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Kandang Kerbau Hospital, 1 Hampshire Road, Singapore 0821.

Extract

Shoulder dystocia is an unpredictable obstetrical emergency that results in serious complications especially to the neonate. Such complications include fracture of the clavicle, brachial plexus injury, fracture of the humerus and asphyxia.1-4 The incidence of shoulder dystocia appears to be increasing5 and its unpredictability continues to be the nightmare of the obstetrician. The following is a review of risk factors which are associated with shoulder dystocia, a critical review of the usefulness of antenatal ultrasound in the prediction of the macrosomic fetus and a discussion of the controversies surrounding the management of shoulder dystocia.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Turnpenny, PD, Nimmo, A. Fractured clavicle of the newborn in a population with a high prevalence of grand-multiparity: analysis of 78 consecutive cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 338–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Boyde, ME, Usher, RH, McLean, FH. Fetal macrosomia: prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 715–22.Google Scholar
3Lazer, S, Biale, Y, Mazor, M, Leventhal, H, Insler, V. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 501505.Google ScholarPubMed
4Wilkstrom, I, Axelson, O, Bergstrom, R, Meirik, O. Traumatic injury in the large-for-dates infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 259–64.Google Scholar
5Langer, O, Berkus, MD, Huff, RW, Samueloff, A. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing >4000grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991, 166: 831–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Dignam, WJ. Difficulties in delivery, including shoulder dystocia and malpresentations of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1976; 19: 577–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Resnik, R. Management of shoulder girdle dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Benedetti, TJ, Gabbe, SG. Shoulder dystocia: a complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 526–29.Google ScholarPubMed
9Johnstone, NR. Shoulder dystocia: a study of 47 cases. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 19: 2831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Hopwood, HG. Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 162–65.Google Scholar
11Acker, DV, Sachs, BP, Friedman, EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 762–68.Google ScholarPubMed
12Gross, TL, Sokol, RJ, Williams, T, Thompson, K. Shoulder dystocia: a fetal-physician risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1408–18.Google Scholar
13Gross, SJ, Shime, J, Farine, D. Shoulder dystocia: predictors and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 334–36.Google Scholar
14Sandmire, HF, Halloin, TJ. Shoulder dystocia: its incidence and associated risk factors. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 26: 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Hassan, AA. Shoulder dystocia: risk factors and prevention. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28: 107109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Nocon, JJ, McKenzie, DK, Thomas, LJ, Hansell, RS. Shoulder dystocia: an analysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1732–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Spong, CY, Beall, M, Rodrigues, D, Ross, MG. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head to body delivery intervals and/or use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 288.Google Scholar
18Yeo, GSH, Lim, YW, Yeong, CT, Tan, TC. Risk factors for the prediction of shoulder dystocia in 16,471 consecutive births. Ann Acad Med Sing 1995; 24: 836–40.Google Scholar
19Lewis, DF, Raymond, RC, Perkins, MB, Brooks, GG, Heymann, AR. Recurrence rate of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1369–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Keller, JD, Lopez-Zeno, JA, Dooley, SL, Socol, ML. Shoulder dystocia and birth trauma in gestational diabetes: five year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 928–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Walle, T, Hartikainen-Sorri, A-L. Obstetric shoulder injury: associated risk factors, prediction and prognosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 73: 450–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Combs, CA, Singh, NB, Khoury, JC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 492–96.Google Scholar
23 ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 159. Fetal Macrosomia Int J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 39: 341–45.Google Scholar
24Modanlou, HD, Dorchester, WL, Thorosian, A, Freeman, RK. Macrosomia - maternal, fetal and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 420–24.Google Scholar
25Yeo, GSH, Chan, WB, Lun, KC, Lai, FM. Racial differences in fetal morphometry in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Sing 1994; 23: 371–76.Google Scholar
26Katzman, GH, Satish, M. Screening term LGA neonates for hypoglycemia: the Colorado vs Portland intrauterine growth charts. J Perinatol 1987; 7: 4446.Google Scholar
27Brenner, WE, Edelman, DA, Hendricks, CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 555–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Modanlou, HD, Komatsu, G, Dorchester, W, Freeman, RK, Bosu, SK. Large-for-gestational age neonates: anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 417–23.Google ScholarPubMed
29Ott, WJ, Doyle, S. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 201208.Google Scholar
30Tamura, RK, Sabbagha, RE, Depp, R, Dooley, SL, Socol, ML. Diabetic macrosomia: accuracy of third trimester ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 828–31.Google Scholar
31Hadlock, FP, Harris, RB, Sharmon, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Chauhan, SP, Lutton, PM, Bailey, KJ, Guerrieri, JP, Morrison, JC. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients' estimates of newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 340–43.Google Scholar
33Delpapa, EH, Mueller-Heubach, E. Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 340–43.Google ScholarPubMed
34Levine, AB, Lockwood, CJ, Brown, B, Lapinski, R, Berkowitz, RL. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 5558.Google Scholar
35Pollack, RN, Hauer-Pollack, G, Divon, MY. Macrosomia in post-dates pregnancies. The accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Chang, TC, Robson, SC, Spencer, JAD, Gallivan, S. Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: analysis of inter-and intra-observer variability. J Clin Ultrasound 1993; 21: 515–19.Google Scholar
37Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307310.Google Scholar
38Warsof, SL, Gohari, P, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1977; 128: 881–92.Google Scholar
39Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Carpenter, RJ, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984; 150: 535–40.Google Scholar
40Sabbagha, RE, Minogue, J, Tamura, RK, Hungerford, SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulae targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 854–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Songster, G, Golde, S. The prediction of fetal weight at term by preterm ultrasound. Soc Perinatol Obstet 1985; 14: 157.Google Scholar
42Landon, MB, Mintz, MC, Gabbe, SG. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: predictor of the large for gestational age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160 115–21.Google Scholar
43Ogata, ES, Sabbagha, R, Metzger, BE, Phelps, RL, Depp, R, Freinkel, N. Serial ultrasonography to assess evolving fetal macrosomia: studies in 23 pregnant diabetic women. JAMA 1980; 243: 2405–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Elliott, JP, Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK, McQuown, DS, Patel, JM. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 159–61.Google ScholarPubMed
45Abramowicz, JS, Sherer, DM, Woods, JR. Ultrasonographic measurement of cheek to cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 405408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Mintz, MC, Landon, MB, Gabbe, SG, Marinelli, DL, Ludmir, J, Grumbach, K et al. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 240–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Naeff, RW, Morrison, JC. Guidelines for the management of shoulder dystocia. J Perinatol 1994; 14: 435–41.Google Scholar
48Gonik, B, Stringer, CA, Held, B. An alternative maneuver for the management of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 882–84.Google Scholar
49Sandberg, EC. The Zavanelli maneuver extended: progression of a revolutionary concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Levine, MG, Holroyde, J, Woods, JR, Siddiqi, TA, Scott, M, Miodovnik, M. Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 792–95.Google ScholarPubMed
51Gonik, B, Stringer, CA, Sorab, J. Objective evaluation of the shoulder dystocia phenomenon: effect of maternal pelvic orientation on force reduction. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 4447.Google Scholar
52Allen, RH, Bankoski, BR, Butzin, CA, Nagey, DA. Comparing clinician-applied loads for routine, difficult, and shoulder dystocia deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1621–27.Google Scholar
53Acker, DB. A shoulder dystocia intervention form. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 150–51.Google ScholarPubMed
54Tey, A, Eriksen, NL, Blanco, JD. A prospective randomized trial of induction versus expectant management and nondiabetic pregnancies with fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 293.Google Scholar
55Weeks, J., Porto, M, Asrat, T, Spinnato, J, Morgan, M. Intrapartum diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: is ultrasound diagnosis superior to clinical estimation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar