Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T15:05:32.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Competition, Yield and Tuber Size of Potato as Affected by Herbicides Under Sudanese Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

A. I. Mohamed  and
M. O. M. Nour
A. I. Mohamed
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan
M. O. M. Nour
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects on the potato crop of the herbicides metribuzin, linuron and metobromuron, singly and in combination with each other and with hand weeding, were investigated and compared with cropped and uncropped weedy controls. Weed competition was determined by measuring weed dry weight. When the three herbicides were applied singly metribuzin gave the lowest weed dry weight, while the combination of metribuzin, metobromuron and hand weeding gave the lowest weed dry weight per unit area of all treatments in both seasons. However, the best potato yield was obtained from the combination of metribuzin and hand weeding. Metobromuron consistently reduced yield through reduction of tuber size irrespective of its effect on weed competition. Metribuzin was the best herbicide for the control of broad leaved weeds and many grasses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 59 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Callihan, R. R., Stallknecht, G. F., Dwelle, R. B., Blickarezyk, M. & Scoggan, A. C. (1976). Influence of time and rate of metribuzin application on potato yield and quality. In Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science 29:174 (Weed Abstracts 26(6)).Google Scholar
Ennis, W. B. Jr, Show, W. C., Danielson, L. L., Klingman, D. L. & Timmon, F. L. (1963). Chemical weed control on farm management practices. Advances in Agronomy 15:161.Google Scholar
Evans, S. (1968). Potato and herbicides. Agriculture 75:55–58.Google Scholar
Hamdoun, A. M. & El Tigani, K. B. (1977). Weed control problems in Sudan. PANS 23:190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. C. R. (1964). Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar
Misovic, M. (1972). Examination of the effects of linuron and prometryne on organic production, potato weed control efficiency and quality under different agro-ecological conditions. Zboronik Radova Poljopriverdnog Fakulteta Univerzitet Ubeogradu 20:541 (Weed Abstracts 24(11)).Google Scholar
Mohamed, A. L (1977). Effect of two herbicide applications on the dry weight, nutrient uptake, weed control, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Katahdin. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 97 pp.Google Scholar
Murphy, H. J., Goven, M. J. & Sewell, W. D. (1969). Effect of pre-emergence and early post-emergence weed control with paraquat on yield and specific gravity of Katahdin and Russet Burbank. American Potato Journal 46:432.Google Scholar
Saghir, A. R. & Markoullis, G. (1974). The effect of weed competition and herbicides on yield and quality of potatoes. In Proceedings of the 12th British Weed Control Conference, 533–539.Google Scholar
Trishkin, S. A. (1968). The effect of simazine and monuron on seed qualities of potatoes. Khimiya Sel' Khoz. 6:279–280 (Weed Abstracts 18(1)).Google Scholar