Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:38:37.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEED-ORIENTED PLANTING IMPROVES LIGHT INTERCEPTION, RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY AND GRAIN YIELD OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

GUILHERME M. TORRES ,
ADRIAN KOLLER ,
RANDY TAYLOR  and
WILLIAM R. RAUN
GUILHERME M. TORRES*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
ADRIAN KOLLER
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Architecture, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland
RANDY TAYLOR
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
WILLIAM R. RAUN
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: guilherme.torres@okstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seed-oriented planting provides a manner to influence canopy structure. The purpose of this research was to improve maize light interception using seed-oriented planting to manipulate leaf azimuth across the row thereby minimizing leaf overlap. To achieve leaf azimuths oriented preferentially across the row, seeds were planted: (i) upright with caryopsis pointed down, parallel to the row (upright); and (ii) laying flat, embryo up, perpendicular to the row (flat). These treatments were compared to conventionally planted seeds with resulting random leaf azimuth distribution. Seed orientation effects were contrasted with three levels of plant population and two levels of hybrid specific canopy structures. Increased plant population resulted in greater light interception but yield tended to decrease as plant population increased. The planophile hybrid produced consistently greater yields than the erectophile hybrid. The difference between planophile and erectophile hybrids ranged from 283 to 903 kg ha−1. Overall, mean grain yield for upright and flat seed placement increased by 351 and 463 kg ha−1 compared to random seed placement. Greater cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) was found for oriented seeds rather than random-oriented seeds. At physiological maturity upright, flat and random-oriented seeds intercepted 555, 525 and 521 MJ m−2 of PAR, respectively. Maize yield responded positively to improved light interception and better radiation use efficiency. Under irrigated conditions, precision planting of maize increased yield by 9 to 14% compared to random-oriented seeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 210 - 225
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The original version of this article was published with an incorrect Title. A notice detailing this has been published and the error rectified in the online PDF and HTML copies.

References

REFERENCES

Bosy, J. and Aarssen, L. W. (1995). The effect of seed orientation on germination in a uniform environment: Differential success without genetic or environmental variation. Journal of Ecology 83:769–773.Google Scholar
Coelho, D. T. and Dale, R. F. (1980). An energy-crop growth variable and temperature function for predicting corn growth and development: Planting to silking. Agronomy Journal 72:503–510.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. T., Purcell, L. C. and Vories, E. D. (2005). Light interception and yield potential of short-season maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in the Midsouth. Agronomy Journal 97:225–234.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. C. and Pierce, F. J. (1996). Leaf azimuth in strip-intercropped corn. Agronomy Journal 88:6–9.Google Scholar
Girardin, P. and Tollenaar, M. (1992). Leaf azimuth in maize: Origin and effects on canopy patterns. European Journal of Agronomy 1:227–233.Google Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. and Porter, J. R. (2006). The Physiology of Crop Yield, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. B. (1980). Increased leaf area (source) and yield of maize in short-season areas. Crop Science 20:571–574.Google Scholar
Karlen, D. and Camp, C. (1985). Row spacing, plant population, and water management effect on corn in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Agronomy Journal 77:393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiniry, J., Jones, C. A., O'toole, J. C., Blanchet, R., Cabelguenne, M. and Spanel, D. A. (1989). Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain-filling for five grain-crop species. Field Crops Research 20:51–64.Google Scholar
Koller, A. A. (2013). Design, performance prediction and validation of a seed orienting corn planter (doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Stillwater, OK.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Arkebauer, T. J., Walters, D. T. Casman, K. G. and Dobermann, A. (2005). Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agronomy Journal 97 (1):72–78.Google Scholar
Maddonni, G. A. and Otegui, M. E. (1996). Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Research 48 (1):81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddonni, G., Otegui, M. E., Andrieu, B., Chelle, M. and Casal, J.J. (2002). Maize leaves turn away from neighbors. Plant Physiology 130:1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meek, D. W., Hatfield, J. L., Howell, T. A., Idso, S. B. and Reginato, R. J. (1984). A generalized relationship between photosynthetically active radiation and solar radiation. Agronomy Journal 76:939–945.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. and Moss, C. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lon. Biological Sciences. 281:277–294.Google Scholar
Otegui, M. E., Nicolini, M. G., Ruiz, R. A. and Dodds, P. A. (1995). Sowing date effects on grain yield components for different maize genotypes. Agronomy Journal 87 (1):29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, G. and Van Doren, D. (1970). Effect of seed orientation on emergence and growth of corn. Agronomy Journal 62:592–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D. B. and Woolley, J. T. (1959). Orientation corn planting saves moisture. Crops and Soils 11 (8):22.Google Scholar
Ray, J. D. and Sinclair, T. R. (1998). The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 49:1381–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J. and Benson, G. O. (1993). How a corn plant develops. Special Report 43. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS® Software Version 9.2 for Windows, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Stinson, H. T. and Moss, D. N. (1960). Some effects of shade upon corn hybrids tolerant and intolerant of dense planting. Agronomy Journal 52:482–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SYSTAT Software Inc. (2002). TableCurve 2D, Version 5.01 for Windows. Richmond, CA: SYSTAT Software Inc.Google Scholar
Toler, J., Murdock, E., Stapleton, G. and Wallace, S. (1999). Corn leaf orientation effects on light interception, intraspecific competition, and grain yields. Journal of Production Agriculture 12:396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollenaar, M. and Bruulsema, T. (1988). Efficiency of maize dry matter production during periods of complete leaf area expansion. Agronomy Journal 80:580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, G., Vossenkemper, J., Raun, W. and Taylor, R. (2011). Maize (Zea mays L.) leaf angle and emergence as affected by seed orientation at planting. Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47 (4):529–592.Google Scholar
Westgate, M., Forcella, F., Reicosky, D. and Somsen, J. (1997). Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield. Field Crops Research 49:249–258.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Torres supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Torres supplementary material(Image)
Image 5 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Torres supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Torres supplementary material(Image)
Image 2.5 MB