Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:33:52.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Some Turkish Wheat Cultivars to Vernalization and Photoperiod

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Serpil Terzioğlu
Serpil Terzioğlu
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Beytepe Campus, Ankara, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The vernalization and photoperiodic response of six locally adapted bread wheat cultivars grown under natural daylength conditions during the summer or winter months was examined in glasshouse experiments. The wheat was vernalized by chilling imbibed grains at 2 ± 1°C for 0, 15 or 45 days. Vernalization for 45 days followed by long summer days led to floral initiation in all cultivars within 28 days but vernalization for 0 or 15 days only led to floral initiation in one cultivar. Vernalization followed by long days reduced the time from transplanting to anthesis, resulting in early ear emergence. Vernalization followed by short days accelerated the development of all the cultivars, but normal development could also occur without vernalization at this time of year. Apical differentiation of the primary shoot and its length and development gave the most reliable information on the period of vernalization required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 237 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Friend, D. J. C. (1966). The effects of light and temperature on the growth of cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses, 181–199 (Eds Milthorpe, F. L. and Ivins, J. D.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Halloran, G. M. (1975). Genotype differences in photoperiodic sensitivity and vernalization response in wheat. Annals of Botany 39:845–851.Google Scholar
Junges, W. (1959). Beeinflussung des Bluhbeginns annueller landwirtshaftlicher und gartnerischer Kultur-pflanzen dutch Jarowisation bei Konstanten Temperaturen zwischen − 10°C und +35°C. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtg 41:103–122.Google Scholar
Ketellapper, H. J. (1966). Vernalization requirement for flowering: Magnoliaphytes. In Environmental Biology, 897–902 (Eds Altman, P. L. and Dittmer, D. S.). Bethesda: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Appleyard, M. (1984). Cereal Development Guide, 2nd Edition. Warwickshire: NAC Arable Unit.Google Scholar
Levy, J. & Peterson, M. L. (1972). Responses of spring wheats to vernalization and photoperiod. Crop Science 12:487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suge, H. (1978). Role of vernalization in crop production. In Crop Physiology 79–109 (Ed. Gupta, V. S.). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing.Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Vince-Prue, D. (1985). Juvenility, photoperiodism and vernalization. In Advanced Plant Physiology, 408–439 (Ed. Wilkins, Malcolm B.). London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, J. F. (1975). The physiology and development of temperate cereals. In Australian Field Crops. 1. Wheat and Other Cereals, 59–98 (Eds Lazenby, A. and Matheson, E. M.). Angus Robertson.Google Scholar
Wellensiek, S. J. (1960). Stem elongation and flower initiation. Proceedings. Koninklijke Nederlandses Akademie Van Wetenschappen Series C63:159–166.Google Scholar