Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:15:48.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reaction of Genotypes of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Iron Chlorosis in a Calcareous Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

B. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, Bihar, India
M. K. Sinha
Affiliation:
Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, Bihar, India
R. A. Singh
Affiliation:
Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, Bihar, India
B. N. Singh
Affiliation:
Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848 125, Bihar, India

Summary

Nine rice genotypes were classed as tolerant, moderately tolerant, susceptible and highly susceptible, depending on their growth retardation and the intensity of lime-induced iron chlorosis. All except genotypes IET 7972 and IET 7973 showed varying degreees of chlorosis and corresponding decreases in shoot dry matter production. Chlorosis was negatively correlated with the orthophenanthroline reactive Fe2+ iron content of the leaves, the concentration of which accounted for 82% of the variability in chlorosis. However, total iron concentration in the leaves and the Fe/Mn, Fe/Cu and K/Fe ratios were not significantly correlated with dry matter accumulation in the plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Foy, C. D. & Voigt, P. W. (1980). Differential tolerance of weeping love grass genotypes to acid coal mine spoils. Agronomy Journal 72:859862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foy, C. D., Voigt, P. W. & Schwartz, J. W. (1977). Differential susceptibilities of weeping love grass strains to an iron related chlorosis on calcareous soils. Agronomy Journal 69:491496.Google Scholar
Gauch, H. C. (1972). Inorganic Plant Nutrition, 363364. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
IRRI (1976). Standard Evaluation System for Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.Google Scholar
Katyal, J. C. & Sharma, B. D. (1980). A new technique of plant analysis to resolve Fe chlorosis. Plant and Soil 55:105119.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. & Norvell, W. A. (1978). Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 42:421428.Google Scholar
Ponnamperuma, F. N. (1978). In International Rice Research Institute Major Research in Upland Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Shukla, U. C. & Gupta, B. L. (1975). Response to Mn application and evaluation of chemical extractants to determine available Mn in some Arid Brown Soils of Haryana, Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 23:357364.Google Scholar
Voigt, P. W., Dewald, C. L., Matocha, J. E. & Foy, C. D. (1982). Adoption of iron-efficient and iron-inefficient lovegrass strains to calcareous soils. Crop Science 22:672676.Google Scholar