Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:16:59.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intercropping Cotton and Groundnut in Low and High Rainfall Areas in Eastern Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. V. Waterworth
J. V. Waterworth
Affiliation:
Luangwa Integrated Resource Development Project, PO Box 510249, Chipata, Zambia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Yields of intercropped cotton and groundnuts grown on alternate ridges 75 cm apart were compared in areas of high (more than 1000 mm a year) and low (less than 800 mm a year) rainfall and in rainy seasons with a low and high frequency of drought periods. There was no advantage from intercropping in the low rainfall area but in the high rainfall area land equivalent ratios of about 1.4 were obtained, confirming that intercropping is more suited to wet conditions. These high land equivalent ratios were associated with enhanced yields per plant in the cotton and unsuppressed yields per plant in the groundnuts, suggesting that a crop such as cotton, which both tolerates a wide range of population density and has a late-developing leaf canopy, may be particularly well suited to intercropping.

Cultivo simultáneo de algodón y chufa en zonas con altas y bajas precipitaciones en el este de Zambia

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 461 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ARPT (1983). Annual Report, Eastern Province Adaptive Research Planning Team. Chipata, Zambia: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
DoM (1970). Climate Data Publication 14. Dry Spells. Lusaka, Zambia: Department of Meteorology.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977). Studies in mixed cropping. I. Seasonal differences in relative productivity of crop mixtures and pure stands in the Kenya highlands. Experimental Agriculture 13:177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honisch, O. (1970) Save time sowing cotton. Farming in Zambia Journal 6(1):22.Google Scholar
LIRDP (1993) Farming Systems Annual Report, Luangwa Integrated Resource Development Project. Chipata, Zambia: LIRDP.Google Scholar
Rees, D. J. (1986) Crop growth, development and yield in semi-arid conditions in Botswana. II. The effects of intercropping Sorghum bicolor with Vigna unguiculata. Experimental Agriculture 22:169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veldcamp, W. J., Muchinda, M. & Delmotte, A. P. (1984). Soil Bulletin No. 9. Agro-climatic Zones in Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Waterworth, J. V. (1992). Review of Agronomic Work on Groundnuts, 1960 to 1990. Lusaka, Zambia: Department of Agriculture. (Mimeograph.)Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979) Intercropping–its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32:1.Google Scholar