Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T14:30:47.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INFLUENCE OF SCATTERED NÉRÉ AND KARITÉ TREES ON MICROCLIMATE, SOIL FERTILITY AND MILLET YIELD IN BURKINA FASO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

K. Jonsson
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden
C. K. Ong
Affiliation:
International Center for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya
J. C. W. Odongo
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Niamey, Niger

Abstract

Microclimate and soil fertility were measured under and away from the canopies of small and large scattered trees of néré (Parkia biglobosa) and karité (Vitellaria paradoxa) to explain their influence on pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). During the rainy season, photosynthetically active radiation under both tree canopies was reduced to 24% of incident radiation but, surprisingly, millet biomass was not significantly different from that in the open. Millet seedlings under the tree canopies experienced only 1–9 h week−1 of supra-optimal temperatures (>40 °C) compared with 27 h week−1 in the open. Reduction in windspeed and soil evaporation was observed under the trees but was unlikely to have a significant influence on millet growth since water was not limiting (rainfall = 920 mm).

Exchangeable potassium, percentage carbon and pH were significantly higher and δ13C lower in soil under trees than in the open. Nitrogen levels were not significantly higher than in the open except for large néré trees. Carbon derived from C3 plants, calculated from δ13C, was significantly higher in soils under trees than in the open and is recommended as a good indicator of the influence of trees on soils. These results show that the combined beneficial effects of temperature modifications and soil fertility could exceed the negative effect of tree shade.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)