Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T01:59:42.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Precision of Cocoa Progeny Trials Using Calibrator Trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. Lockwood
Affiliation:
Cocoa Research Institute, PO Box 8, Tafo-Akim, Ghana†

Summary

In nine breeding trials with cocoa in Ghana the experimental trees were interplanted with temporary trees of a standard variety as ‘calibrators’. The calibrators were removed after 2–2½ years before there was strong competition with the permanent trees. Trunk diameters of the calibrators were used as covariates in analyses of trunk size and yield of dry cocoa up to 7 years after planting, giving reductions in standard errors of differences between progenies of up to 25% in analyses of size and 15% in analyses of yield.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cunningham, R. K. & Burridge, J. C. (1959). J. hort. Sci. 34, 229.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. (1965). Commencement of a New Cycle of Breeding, 19621963. Mimeo., Cocoa Research Institute, Ghana.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. & Edwards, D. F. (1961). Rep. Cocoa Conf., London 1961, 137.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. & Vernon, A. J. (1965). J. hort. Sci. 40, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G. & Martin, K. J. (1976). J. hort. Sci. 51, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. S. & Pearce, S. C. (1976). J. hort. Sci. 51, 533.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1976). Field Experimentation with Fruit Trees and Other Perennial Crops. Tech. Comm. 23, Comm. Bur. Hort. Plantation Crops, East Mailing (2nd edn.)Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. & Moore, C. S. (1976). Expl Agric. 12, 267.Google Scholar
Pound, F. J. (1940). Trop. Agric., Trin. 17, 6.Google Scholar