Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:05:48.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Field Performance of Induced Uniculm Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in South-east Queensland, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. Fukai
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
C. J. Liwa
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
C. W. L. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
B. B. Maharjan
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
R. C. Hermus
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
C. Searle
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
S. W. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
M. A. Foale
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Lawes, Queensland, Australia

Summary

Reduction of leaf area in sorghum without tillers (uniculm sorghum) might result in conservation of water at early stages of growth and hence in stability of grain yield under dry conditions. In two experiments in south-east Queensland, Australia, tillers were removed by hand to examine the growth of uniculm sorghum. Tiller removal promoted root development at the flag leaf stage but significantly reduced shoot dry matter and lowered grain yield by about 20% in a wet season. The saving in soil water as a result of tiller removal was relatively small but statistically significant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blum, A. & Naveh, M. (1976). Improved water-use efficiency in dryland grain sorghum by promoted plant competition. Agronomy Journal 68:111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. F. (1978). Environmental Effects on Panicle Development in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Bruns, H. A. & Horrocks, R. D. (1984). Relationship of yield components of main culms and tillers of grain sorghum. Field Crops Research 8:125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1968). The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17:385403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1979). A barley breeding programme based on an ideotype. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93:261–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. S. & Wilson, G. L. (1975). Studies of grain production in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench) III. The relative importance of assimilate supply, grain growth capacity and transport system. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26:1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, T. M. T. & Sedgley, R. H. (1981). Evidence for a ‘uniculm effect’ in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 30:277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1977). Effects of manipulation of number of tillers and water supply on grain yield in barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88:391–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karper, R. E. (1929). The contrast in response of Kafir and Milo to variations in spacing. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 21:344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Jones, H. G. (1977). The relations between the main shoot and tillers in barley plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88:381–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchow, R. C. & Kerven, G. L. (1977). A low cost instrument for measurement of photosynthetically active radiation in field canopies. Agricultural Meteorology 18:187195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. I. (1966). A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3:139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar