Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:37:45.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evapotranspiration, Water Use Efficiency, Moisture Extraction Pattern and Plant Water Relations of Rape (Brassica campestris) Genotypes in Relation to Root Development under Varying Irrigation Schedules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

V. Raja
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
K. C. Bishnoi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India

Summary

A field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil at Hisar, India during the autumn seasons 1984–85 and 1985–86 to study root characters, evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, moisture extraction pattern and plant water relations of rape genotypes under varying irrigation schedules. Root volume and dry weight increased, while tap root and lateral root lengths decreased with irrigation. Increased irrigation frequency increased evapotranspiration but decreased water use efficiency. The relative water content and osmotic potential of the leaves increased with more frequent irrigation, but plant water retention capacity decreased. There were genotypic differences between the characters examined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blum, A. (1974). Genotypic response in sorghum to drought stress. 1. Response to soil moisture stress. Crop Science 14:361364; 691692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. M. & Thomas, M. (1982). Leaf diffusive resistance, surface temperature, osmotic potential and CO2 assimilation capability as indicators of drought intensity in rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 62:785789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, T. C. & Acevedo, (1974). Plant response to water deficits. Water use efficiency and drought resistance. Agricultural Meteorology 14:3955, 5984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, , & Kumar, A. (1982). Research on toria could meet the challenege of increasing its production. Seeds Farms 8:2529.Google Scholar
Singh, H., Singh, S. P., Singh, K. P. & Singh, T. (1986). Effect of irrigation conditions on seed yield, water use and water use efficiency of toria genotypes. Proceedings of International Seminar on Water Management in Arid and Semi Arid Zones, held at Hisar.Google Scholar
Singh, R. P. (1983). Evaluation of Raya (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss) germplasm for drought conditions. PhD dissertation, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.Google Scholar
Turner, N. C. (1981). Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil 58:339366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherley, P. E. (1950). In The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, 157184 (ed. by Fogged, G. E.). London and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar