Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T16:17:48.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Time of Nitrogen Application on Yield of Maize in the Tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Adeboyejo A. Fayemi
Adeboyejo A. Fayemi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A four-year study from 1958 to 1962 showed that time of application of fertilizer nitrogen greatly influenced the yield of grain, the percentage of nitrogen and the crude protein of the grain under Nigerian conditions characteristic of the early maize cropping season from March to July. Split applications of nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased maize grain yield by 35 per cent when two equal doses were given one month and two months after planting; and by 31 per cent when four equal doses were supplied at planting and one month, two months and three months after seeding. Yield was significantly reduced when application was delayed two months after planting. High yields of maize were not obtained by supplying the whole of nitrogen fertilizer at one time, eidier at sowing or any time later during the growing season. However, applying all of the nitrogen fertilizer one month after planting significantly increased the percentage of nitrogen and of the crude protein content of the grain. The maize ear weight was favourably influenced by spreading the nitrogen application over the three-month period of the maize growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1966 , pp. 101 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1959). Maize. Dep. Agric. Nyasaland,Rept. II, 7.Google Scholar
Diamond, W. E. B. (1937). Emp.J. expt. Agric. 5, 264.Google Scholar
Doyne, H. C. & Watson, W. A. (1933). J. Agric. Set. 23, 208.Google Scholar
Fayemi, A. A. (1963). Emp. J. expt. Agric. 31, 371.Google Scholar
Gautam, O. P., Shah, V. H. & Singh, Y. (1964). Ind. J. Agron. 9, 1.Google Scholar
Laird, P. J. & Lizarraga, H. H. (1959). Sec. Agric. Gonad. Mexico Fol. tec. 35, 63.Google Scholar
Lanza, F. (1959). Maydica 4, 67.Google Scholar
Macfarland, J. (1939) Emp. J. expt. Agric. 1, 155.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods,5th Ed. Ames: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Verma, G. & Bhatnagar, P. S. (1962). Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 32, 1.Google Scholar
Vine, H. (1953). Emp. J. expt. Agric. 21, 65.Google Scholar