Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T23:11:57.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlled environments as an Adjunct to Field Research on Lentils (Lens culinaris). III. Photoperiodic Lighting and Consequences for Flowering†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. J. Summerfield ,
F. J. Muehlbauer  and
E. H. Roberts
R. J. Summerfield
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Legume Breeding and Production, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
F. J. Muehlbauer
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Legume Breeding and Production, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
E. H. Roberts
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Legume Breeding and Production, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Six genotypes of lentil (Lens culinaris) were grown in pots in a glasshouse under natural photo-periods of 10–12 h, extended to an inductive photoperiod of 16 h by supplementary illumination from incandescent lamps. The illuminance of the supplementary light was varied by placing replicate pots at different distances from the lamps; it decreased geometrically with distance (i.e. down an illuminance gradient) from about 2000 lux directly beneath the lamps to about 40 lux at a distance of 6 m from them. All genotypes came into flower progressively later as illuminance decreased; those selected in northern temperate regions were especially sensitive, taking about twice as long to flower at an illuminance of 40 compared with 2000 lux. We suggest, however, that these quantitative responses do not reflect differences in sensitivity to illuminance per se, but are the consequences of genotypic differences in sensitivity to photoperiod. The implications of these data are discussed in terms of adaptation to the aerial environment and strategies for screening germplasm and plant breeding in lentils and other grain legumes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bickford, E. D. & Dunn, S. (1972). Lighting for Plant Growth. Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Byth, D. E., Green, J. M. & Hawtin, G. C. (1980). ICRISAT/ICARDA chickpea breeding strategies. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 11–27 (Eds Green, J. M., Nene, Y. L. & Smithson, J. B). Patancheru, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. F. (1976). Sunrise, sunset. Weather 31:427–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, P., Summerfield, R. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1983). Effects of temperature and photoperiod on reproductive development of selected grain legume crops. In The Physiology, Genetics and Nodulation of Temperate Legumes (Eds Davies, D. R. & Jones, D. Gareth). London: Pitmans (in press).Google Scholar
List, R. J. (1958). Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institute.Google Scholar
Major, D. J. & Johnson, D. R. (1974). Effect of light intensity on the development of field grown soya-beans. Crop Science 14:839–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mera, M. K. & Erskine, W. (1982). Crossing techniques for lentil under field conditions. Lens 9:11–15.Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, F. J., Slinkard, A. E. & Wilson, V. E. (1980). Lentil. In Hybridization of Crop Plants, 417–426 (Eds Fehr, W. R. & Hadley, H. H.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Riva, E. A. (1975). Precoz, a new lentil cultivar for Argentina. Lens 2:9–10.Google Scholar
Saint-Clair, P. M. (1972). Responses of Lens esculenta to controlled environment factors Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool 72–12. Wageningen, pp. 84.Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. (1963). The Flowering Process. New York: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. (1981). Responses to photoperiod. In Responses to the Physical Environment, 135–168 (Eds Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. & Ziegler, H.). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sethi, S. C. (1979). Rapid generation turnover. International Chickpea Newsletter 1:3–4.Google Scholar
Slinkard, A. E. & Bhatty, R. S. (1979). Laird lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59:503–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. (1981). Adaptation to environments. In Lentils, 91–110 (Eds Webb, C. & Hawtin, G.). Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Muehlbauer, F. J. (1982). Controlled environments as an adjunct to field research on lentils (Lens culinaris). II. Research strategy. Experimental Agriculture 18:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1983a). Soyabeans. In A Handbook of Flowering (Ed. Halevy, A. H.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press (in press).Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1983b). Grain legume species of significant economic importance in world agriculture: perspective. In A Handbook of Flowering (Ed. Halevy, A. H.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press (in press).Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Minchin, F. R. & Wien, H. C. (1979). Screening for environmental adaptability in soyabean and cowpea: an improved strategy. World Crops 31:21–23.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Muehlbauer, F. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1983). Lentils. In A Handbook of Flowering (Ed. Halevy, A. H.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press (in press).Google Scholar
Vergara, B. S. & Chang, T. T. (1976). The Flowering Responses of the Rice Plant to Photoperiod. Manila, The Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Vince-Prue, D. (1975). Photoperiodism in Plants. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vince-Prue, D. (1983). Photoperiodic control of plant reproduction. In Strategies of Plant Reproduction, 73–98 (Ed. Meudt, W.). St Albans: Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, V. E. & Law, A. G. (1972). Registration of Tekoa lentil. Crop Science 12:255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withrow, R. B. (1959). A kinetic analysis of photoperiodism. In Photoperiodism, 439–447 (Ed. Withrow, R. B.). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar