Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T07:35:57.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DRY MATTER PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CONTENT OF LONGAN GROWN ON AN ACID ULTISOL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

RICARDO GOENAGA
RICARDO GOENAGA*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Tropical Agriculture Research Station, 2200 P.A. Campos Ave., Suite 201, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico00680-5470
*
†Corresponding author. Email: Ricardo.Goenaga@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Little is known about the adaptability of longan (Dimocarpus longan) to acidic soils high in aluminum (Al). A two-year field study was conducted to determine the effects of various levels of soil Al on dry matter production, plant growth and nutrient content in shoots of four cultivars of longan. Soil Al and cultivars were statistically different for all variables measured in the study. Total leaf, petiole, stem and root dry weights significantly decreased at soil Al concentrations ranging from 5.1 to 12.1 cmol kg−1 but this reduction was of a smaller magnitude in roots than in other organs. Increments in soil Al resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of leaf Ca and a significant increase in leaf Al in all cultivars. Shoot content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn and Al declined with increase in soil Al. The result of this study demonstrates that longan is highly susceptible to acid soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 225 - 233
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, T. R., Dunst, R. M., Taft, T. and Vercant, M. (2002). The vegetative response of ‘Concord’ grapevines to soil ph. HortScience 37:890–893.Google Scholar
Committee on Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics, National Research Council (1993). Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. Board on Agriculture and Board on Science and Technology for International Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C. and Clark, R. B. (2006). Physiology of Crop Production. New York: The Hayworth Press.Google Scholar
Foy, C. D. (1984). Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soil. In Soil Acidity and Liming, 57–97 (Ed Adams, F.). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
George, E., Horst, W. and Neumann, E. (2012). Adaptation of plants to adverse chemical soil conditions. In Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 417–429 (Ed Marschner, P.). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goenaga, R. (2011). Dry matter production and leaf elemental concentrations of rambutan grown on an acid Ultisol. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34:753–761.Google Scholar
Himelrick, D. G. (1991). Growth and nutritional responses of nine grape cultivars to low soil pH. Hortscience 26:269–271.Google Scholar
Hoekenga, O., Maron, L. G., Pineros, M. A., Cancado, G. M., Shaff, J., Kobayashi, Y., Ryan, P. R., Dong, B., Delhaize, E., Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, H., Koyama, H. and Kochian, L. V. (2006). Atalmt1 (at1g08430) which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy Science 103:9738–9743.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Subhadrabandhu, S., Mitra, S. K., Ben-Arie, R. and Stern, R. A. (2005). Origin, history, production and processing. In Litchi and Longan, 25–34 (Eds Menzel, C. M. and Waite, G. K.). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
IBSNAT. (1987). Field and Laboratory Methods of IBSNAT. Technical Report. Honolulu, HI: Department of Agronomy and Soil Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kamprath, E. J. (1984). Crop responses to lime on soils in the tropics. In Soil Acidity and Liming, 349–368 (Ed Adams, F.). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Pence, N. S., Letham, D. L. D., Pineros, M. A., Magalhaes, J. V., Hoekenga, O. W. and Garvin, D. F. (2002). Mechanisms of metal resistance in plants: aluminum and heavy metals. Plant and Soil 247:109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkin-Elmer, (1994). Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Norwalk, CT: The Perkin- Elmer Corporation.Google Scholar
Samac, D. A. and Tesfaye, M. (2003). Plant improvement for tolerance to aluminum in acid soils – a review. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 75:189–207.Google Scholar
Subhadrabandhu, S. and Stern, R. A. (2005). Taxonomy, botany and plant development. In Litchi and Longan, 25–34 (Eds Menzel, C. M. and Waite, G. K.). Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Villagarcia, M. R., Carter, T. E., Rufty, T. W., Niewoehner, A.S., Jennette, M.W. and Arellano, C. (2001). Genotypic rankings for aluminum tolerance of soybean roots grown in hydroponics and sand culture. Crop Science 41:1499–1507.Google Scholar
Wan, Q. (2007). Effect of aluminum stress on the root exudation of longan (Dimocarpus longan) seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 43:21–26.Google Scholar
Xiao, X., Liu, X., Yang, Z., Wan, Q., Zheng, R. and Wan, Z. (2006). Effect of aluminum stress on the content of protein and nucleic acid of longan (Dimocarpus longan) seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 42:24–30.Google Scholar
Xiao, X., Liu, X. L., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Chen, L. and Xie, Y. (2002). Effect of aluminum stress on growth of young longan seedlings. Fujian Journal Agricultural Science 17 (30):182–185.Google Scholar
Zee, F. T. P., Chan, H. T. and Yen, C. R. (1998). Lychee, longan, rambutan and pulasan. In Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, 290–335 (Eds Shaw, P. E., Chen, H. T. and Nagy, S.). Auburndale, FL: AgScience.Google Scholar