Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:23:50.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Leaves in Oil Palm (Elaeis Guineensis) and Determination of Leaf Opening Rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. J. Breure
Affiliation:
Dami Oil Palm Research Station, PO 165, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea

Summary

Oil palm rachis length was determined on primordia dissected from palms planted at four densities. It started to increase rapidly in leaf–10, that is, about ten leaves younger than the spear leaf in all density treatments. The mean number of leaf primordia at the three higher palm densities was 47.7 compared with 51.5 at the lowest density of 56 palms ha-1. Some of the palms planted at the highest density were thinned to identify the stage at which the amount of light affected the rate of leaf opening. A sudden increment of light accelerated leaf production at both the rapid expansion stage and the preceding slow expansion stage. The greatest acceleration of leaf production began 24 months after thinning, probably because of the effect of the extra light on the rate of leaf initiation. The response of leaf production to thinning may apply to other related cultural practices.

Desarrollo de hojas en la palma aceitera (Elaeis guineensis) y determination de la tasa de apertura de las hojas

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breure, C. J. (1982). Factors affecting yield and growth of oil palm tenera in West New Britain. Oléagineux 37:213227.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Bos, I. (1992). Development of elite families in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Euphytica 64:99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Corley, R. H. V. (1992). Fruiting activity, growth and yield of oil palm. II. Observations in untreated populations. Experimental Agriculture 28:111121.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Menendez, T. (1990). The determination of bunch yield components in the development of inflorescences in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Experimental Agriculture 26:99115.Google Scholar
Broekmans, A. F. M. (1957). Growth, flowering and yield of the oil palm in Nigeria. Journal of the West African Institute of Oil Palm Research 2:187220.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1976). Inflorescence abortion and sex differentiation. In Oil Palm Research, 37–54 (Eds Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Hew, C. K. (1976). Pruning. In Oil Palm Research, 307–313 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Breure, C. J. (1992). Fruiting activity and yield of oil palm. I. Effects of fruit removal. Experimental Agriculture 28:99109Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Donough, C. R. (1992). Potential yield of oil palm clones–The importance of planting density. In Proceedings of the 1990 ISOPB International Workshop on Yield Potential in the Oil Palm, 5871. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: International Society of Oil Palm Breeders and Palm Oil Research Institutes.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (1957) Recherches cytologique sur l'appareil floral et la graine chez Elaeis guineensis et Cocos nucifera. I. La formation de l'appareil floral. II. Les fleurs et la graine. Revue Générale de Botanique 68:111132,164198.Google Scholar