Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:20:58.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crop Growth, Development and Yield in Semi-arid Conditions in Botswana. II. The Effects of Intercropping Sorghum Bicolor with Vigna Unguiculata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. J. Rees
Affiliation:
Dryland Farming Research Scheme (DLFRS), Agricultural Research Station, P/Bag 0033, Gaborone, Botswana

Summary

Plant growth, development and yield were monitored in sorghum/cowpea intercropping trials in Botswana during the drought seasons of 1982/3 and 1983/4. The cowpea proved to be more competitive than sorghum in these arid conditions, resulting in substantial increases in sorghum mortality and developmental delay, and substantial decreases in sorghum leaf area indices, dry weight production and grain yield. Intercropping in standard rows at medium plant densities resulted in Land Equivalent Ratios considerably less than 1.0, in contrast to earlier trials in Botswana in higher rainfall years which demonstrated intercropping advantages. Low density, wide row intercropping resulted in some small intercropping advantages, suggesting that this treatment may have potential in Botswana's variable climatic conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D. J. (1972). Intercropping with sorghum in Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 8:139150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DLFRS (1983). Dryland Farming Research Scheme, Botswana, Phase 3. 4th Annual Report Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
DLFRS (1984). Dryland Farming Research Scheme, Phase 3. 5th Annual Report. Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
EFSAIP (1981). Evaluation of Farming Systems and Agricultural Implements Project, Botswana. Report No. 5. Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1973). Effects of intercropping maize or sorghum with cowpeas, pigeonpeas or beans. Experimental Agriculture 9:8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977). Studies in mixed cropping. L Seasonal differences in relative productivity of crop mixtures and pure stands in the Kenya Highlands. Experimental Agriculture 13:177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, D. C. L. (1978). Poly culture Cropping Systems: Review and Analysis. Cornell International Agricultural Bulletin 32.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, C. W. F. (1980). An Initial Report on the Evaluation of Intercropping, EFSAIP. Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Mafra, R. C., Lira, M. de A., Arcoverdo, A. S. S., Roberio, G. & Faris, M. A. (1981). Studies on the intercropping of sorghum and corn with Phaseolus beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, 10–13 Jan. 1979, Hyderabad, India, 4651 (Ed. Willey, R. W.), Patancheru, AP 502 234, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Mead, R. & Riley, J. (1981). A review of statistical ideas relevant to intercropping research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 144:462509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, M. & Willey, R. W. (1986). The effects of water stress on yield advantages of intercropping systems. Field Crops Research (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Anand K., Reddy, Raj K. & Reddy, Devender M. (1980). Effects of intercropping on yield and returns in corn and sorghum. Experimental Agriculture 16:179184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, D. J. (1986). Crop growth, development and yield in semi-arid conditions in Botswana. L The effects of population density on Sorghum bicolor. Experimental Agriculture 22:153167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P. (1981). Studies on spatial arrangements in sorghum-legume intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97:655661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar