Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:40:18.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Space as Erinnerungslandschaft. The Case of Lemberg/Lwów/Lvov/Lviv

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Tamás Sajó
Tamás Sajó*
Affiliation:
Studiolum Publisher, Petőfi 81, 2141 Csömör, Hungary. E-mail: tamas@studiolum.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the changes of the memorials in Lviv's representative Liberty Avenue throughout the twentieth century as they reflect the changing regimes of memory of the successive political systems, from the Habsburg Empire through the Republic of Poland, the Soviet and German occupation, the Soviet Union to the independent Ukraine.

Type
Focus: Regimes of Memory
Information
European Review , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 523 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. The theme was introduced in Yates, F. (1966) The Art of Memory (Chicago: Chicago University Press), for the interpretation of Giordano Bruno's ars memoriae. Since then it has been exhaustively examined not only in the history of art and ideas of the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries (most recently L. Bulzoni (2001) La stanza della memoria. Modelli letterari e iconografici nell'età della stampa (Turin: Einaudi)), but also in the late Middle Ages (M. Carruthers (1990) The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); A. Bernat Vistarini and T. Sajó (2013) Arte de recordar. Imágenes del Evangelio (Palma: Olañeta)) and even in Ming-era China, where it was introduced by the Jesuit missionaries received as scholars in Emperor Kangxi's court (J. D. Spence (1985) The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci (London: Faber & Faber)). A good modern summary of the topic is D. Draaisma (2000). Metaphors of Memory. A history of ideas about the mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
2.Assmann, J. (1992) Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Etrinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen (Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck). W. Speitkamp (2000) Kolonialherrschaft und Denkmal. Afrikanische und deutsche Erinnerungskultur im Konflikt, in: Wolfram Martini (Hg, 2000), Architektur und Erinnerung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), (Formen der Erinnerung, 1), pp. 165–90. B. Menkovic (1999) Politische Gedenkkultur. Denkmäler – Die Visualisierung politischer Macht im öffentlichen Raum (Vienna: Braumüller. Merridale). I. Siggelkow (2001) Das Denkmal im öffentlichen Raum: Kunstwerk und politisches Symbol. Gedächtniskultur. Formen privaten und öffentlichen Gedenkens (Vienna: Kunsthistorisches Museum), p. 111.Google Scholar
3. In the included plan, the northern direction is to the left. For a detailed visual documentation on the square's changes, see http://riowang.blogspot.com/2013/01/lwow.htmlGoogle Scholar
4.Prokopovych, M. (2009) Habsburg Lemberg: Architecture, public space, and politics in the Galician capital, 1772–1914 (West Lafayette: Purdue University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
6.Szolginia, W. (1992) Tamten Lwów (Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Sudety).Google Scholar