Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T22:29:33.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Symmetry and Contextuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

Hartmann Römer*
Affiliation:
Physikalisches Institut der Universität Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Str. 3, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. Email: hartmann.roemer@physik.uni-freiburg.de

Abstract

The general concept of symmetry is realized in manifold ways in different realms of reality, such as plants, animals, minerals, mathematical objects or human artefacts in literature, fine arts and society. In order to arrive at a common ground for this variedness a very general conceptualization of symmetry is proposed: the existence of substitutions, which, in the given context, do not lead to an essential change. This simple definition has multiple consequences. (i) The context dependence of the notion of symmetry is evident in the humanities but is by no means irrelevant, yet is often neglected, in science. By taking this context dependence into account, the subtle problematics of concept formation and of the ontological status of ‘similarities’ become evident. In general, the substitutions underlying the concept of symmetry are not really performed but remain in a state of virtuality. Counterfactuality, freedom and creativity come into focus. The detection of previously hidden symmetries may provide deep and surprising insights. (ii) Related to this, due attention is devoted to the aesthetic dimension of symmetry and the breaking of it. (iii) Finally, we point out to what extent life is based on the interplay between order and freedom, between full and broken symmetry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atmanspacher, H, Römer, H and Walach, H (2002) Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics 32, 379406, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014809312397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atmanspacher, H, Filk, T and Römer, H (2006) Weak quantum theory: formal framework and selected applications. In Adenier, G, Khrennikov, A and Nieuwenhuizen, TM (eds), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations – 3: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 810. Melville: American Institute of Physics, pp. 3446.Google Scholar
Filk, T and Römer, H (2011) Generalized quantum theory: overview and latest developments. Axiomathes 21, 211220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9136-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forger, M and Römer, H (2004) Currents and the energy-momentum tensor in classical field theory: a fresh look at an old problem. Annals of Physics 309, 306389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2003.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A (1992) A short introduction to quasicrystallography. In Waldschmidt, M, Moussa, P, Luck, J-M and Itzykson, C (eds), From Number Theory to Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 496537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, LD and Lifshitz, EM (1976) Mechanics. Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, 3rd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Landau, LD and Lifshitz, EM (1980) Statistical Physics. Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5, 3rd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Römer, H (forthcoming) Mythos und Symbol: zur Ontologie von Ähnlichkeits- und Sinnbeziehungen. In Kick, HA (ed.), Affekt, Emotion, Ethik. Münster: LIT Verlag, accessible on the authorʼs homepage: http://omnibus.uni-freiburg.de/~hr357.Google Scholar
Schiller, F (1980) Kallias oder über die Schönheit: Briefe an Gottfried Körner. In Fricke, G and Göpfert, G (eds), Friedrich Schiller: Sämtliche Werke in 5 Bänden: Erzählungen – Theoretische Schriften, Vol. 5. München: Hanser, pp. 394433.Google Scholar
Wikipedia (2018) Mandelbrot set. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set.Google Scholar