Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-fzmlz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T18:20:37.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Referendums and the evolution of party government in liberal democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Laurence Morel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of the motivations behind the present revival of referendum ballots in liberal democracies shows that referendums launched by governments, often politically motivated, and those launched by popular initiatives are linked to a demand for new legislation, and both illustrate the crisis of representative governments that is currently affecting these democracies. The pursuit of the increase of referendums will depend however on whether popular initiatives will or will not be introduced in the Constitutions of countries, since the great majority do not provide for it. In spite of similarities between the present political situation in Western Europe and the contexts in which popular initiatives were introduced in some countries, there is no serious ground to predict that such institutional reforms will take place in the near future. The directness of democracy is maybe more likely to increase under the effect not of referendums, but of other factors like the growing interference of polls, or the decline of intermediaries, especially parties, in the daily practice of government.

Type
Focus: The Future of Democracy in the New Millennium: Can Parties Respond to the Challenge?
Information
European Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 203 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds) (1978) Referendums. A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
2.Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds) (1994) Referendums around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley, CA., University of California Press).Google Scholar
4.Bobbio, N., Il futuro delta democrazia. Una difesa delle regole del gioco, Torino, Einaudi (1984).Google Scholar
5.Dahl, R. A. (1989) Democracy and its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
6.Sartori, G. (1987) The Theory of Democracy revisited (Chatham: Chatham House).Google Scholar
7.Caciagli, M. and Uleri, P. (eds) Democrazie e referendum (Roma-Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
8.Delperee, F. (ed) (1985) Référendums, Centre de recherche et d'information socio-politiques, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
9.Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. (eds) (1996) The Referendum Experience in Europe (Basingstoke and London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hamon, F. (1995) Le référendum. Etude comparative (Paris: LGDJ).Google Scholar
11.Ranney, A. (ed) The Referendum Device (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
12.Ranney, A., Morel, L., Dobelle, J.F. et al. (1996) Le référendum, Pouvoirs, 77.Google Scholar
13.Neidhard, L. (1970) Plebiszit und pluralitaere Demokratie (Berne: Francke).Google Scholar
14.Cronin, T. E. (1989) Direct Democracy. The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Magleby, D. (1994) Direct Legislation in the American States. In Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds), Referendums Around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. (Washington, DC: American Enterprises Institute).Google Scholar
16.Wyller, T. C. (1994) The referendum as a political process. The Norwegian experience. Eur. Cons. of Pol. Res. (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
17.Morel, L. (1993) Party attitudes towards referendums in Western Europe. West european Politics, 16, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Meny, Y. (1991) Grassroots democracy: I referendum a livello locale e statale negli USA. Societa Ital. di Studi Elettorale (fourth Conference) (unpublished paper), Prato.Google Scholar
19.Conac, G. and Maus, D. (eds) (1990) Le référendum, quel avenir? Expériences étrangères, la France (Paris: Editions STH).Google Scholar
20.Lassalle, J. P. (1996) ‘Le référendum aux Etats-Unis’, Pouvoirs, 77.Google Scholar
21.Luciani, M. and Volpi, M. (eds) Referendum. Problemi teorici ed esperienze costituzionali (Roma-Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
22.Price, C. M. (1975) The initiative: a comparative state analysis and reassessment of a Western phenomenon. Western Political Quarterly, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Pasquino, P. (1998) Pourquoi des constituants constitutionnalisent-ils le référendum? Réflexions à partir de Weimar et de Rome. Cahiers du Centre de Recherches en Epistémologie Appliquée (03).Google Scholar
24.Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Lipow, A. and Seyd, P. (1995) Political parties and the challenge to democracy: from steam-engines to techno-populism, New political Science, 33–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Manin, B. (1995) Principes du gouvernement représentatif (Paris: Calmann-Lévy).Google Scholar