Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-14T09:46:40.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uniting Europe: The Council of Europe's Unfinished Mission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2012

Klaus Brummer
Klaus Brummer
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Political Science, Kochstr. 4, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. Email: Klaus.Brummer@polwiss.phil.uni-erlangen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Council of Europe (CoE) is an essential building block of the European integration process. However, the organisation is confronted with fundamental challenges relating to the erosion of its core principles, the overload of the ECHR system and the expansion of the European Union. These developments put the CoE's future in jeopardy. Yet, there are three reasons why the organisation should have a future: the CoE has the potential to become the key forum for dialogue between Europe and Russia, it could make further contributions to a European stability policy, and it could continue to build a pan-European legal space.

Type
Citizenship, Bureaucracy and Entrepreneurship
Information
European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , 02 May 2012 , pp. 403 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Council of Europe, Statement by Carl Bildt, Chairman of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, on his visit to Georgia, Press Release 579, 11 August 2008.Google Scholar
2.Council of Europe, PACE monitoring rapporteur on visit to Moscow to hold talks on the conflict in Georgia, Press Release 588, 20 August 2008.Google Scholar
3.Council of Europe, HR Commissioner – End of his visit to Georgia and Russia, Press Release 612, 5 September 2008.Google Scholar
4. See P. Alston (with M. Bustelo and J. Heenan) (1999) The EU and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press); A. Williams (2004) EU Human Rights Policies. A Study in Irony (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
5. See Article 4 of the Statute of the Council of Europe, available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/001.htm, accessed 2 March 2011.Google Scholar
6. The ‘special guest status’ of the Belarusian parliament to the CoE's Parliamentary Assembly was suspended in 1997. The following year, the country's request for membership in the CoE was frozen. Most recently, the Parliamentary Assembly decided to suspend its high-level contacts with the Belarusian parliament or the country's authorities due to the latter's unwillingness to respect and adhere to the CoE's standards. Council of Europe, PACE suspends its high-level contacts with the Belarusian Government and Parliament, Press Release 259, 29 April 2010; Council of Europe, Belarus: PACE calls for the immediate release of detainees and maintains its suspension of special guest status, Press Release 78, 27 January 2011.Google Scholar
7. See V. Djerić (2000) Admission to Membership of the Council of Europe and legal significance of commitments entered into by New Member States. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 60, pp. 605–629; J. Malenovský (2000) L'Espace Juridique Européen et les Noveaux Pays Membres du Conseil de l'Europe. In B. Haller, H.-C. Krüger and H. Petzold, H. (eds) (2000) Law in Greater Europe. Towards a Common Legal Area. Studies in Honor of Heinrich Klebes (Den Haag: Kluwer), pp. 362–376.Google Scholar
8. This expression was coined by a former Secretary General of the CoE, Daniel Tarschys. Quoted in D. Huber (1999) A decade which Made History – The Council of Europe 1989-1999 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press), p. 167.Google Scholar
9. R. Blackburn and J. Polakiewicz (eds) (2001) Fundamental Rights in Europe. The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950-2000 (Oxford: Oxford University Press); S. Greer (2006) The European Convention on Human Rights. Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
10.de Schutter, O. (1998) La Nouvelle Cour Européenne Des Droits de L'Homme. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 34, pp. 319–352.Google Scholar
11. Committee of Ministers. 2010a. ‘Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. 3rd Annual Report 2009’, April 2010, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/MONITORING/EXECUTION/Source/Publications/CM_annreport2009_en.pdf, accessed 3 July 2010.Google Scholar
12. In addition, almost 12,000 applications were disposed of administratively, mainly because of the applicant's failure to submit a properly completed application form. See European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report 2010, available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/F2735259-F638-4E83-82DF-AAC7E934A1D6/0/2010_Annual_ReportJanuary2011prov2.pdf, accessed 22 March 2011, p. 125.Google Scholar
13. See European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report 2010, available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/F2735259-F638-4E83-82DF-AAC7E934A1D6/0/2010_Annual_ReportJanuary2011prov2.pdf, accessed 22 March 2011, pp. 128–129.Google Scholar
14. See European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report 2010, available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/F2735259-F638-4E83-82DF-AAC7E934A1D6/0/2010_Annual_ReportJanuary2011prov2.pdf, accessed 22 March 2011, p. 126.Google Scholar
15.Eaton, M. and Schokkenbroek, J. (2005) Reforming the Human Rights protection system established by the European Convention on Human Rights. A new Protocol No. 14 to the Convention and other measures to guarantee the long-term effectiveness of the Convention system. Human Rights Law Journal, 26, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
16. K.-O. Sattler (2010) Mehr Tempo, mehr Effizienz, Das Parlament, 10 May 2010.Google Scholar
17.Council of Europe, Protocol 14 – the reform of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Press Division, 31 May 2010.Google Scholar
18. High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Interlaken Declaration. 19 February 2010, available at: http://www.eda.admin.ch/etc/medialib/downloads/edazen/topics/europa/euroc.Par.0133.File.tmp/final_en.pdf, accessed 29 June 2010.Google Scholar
19. J.-C. Juncker (2006) Council of Europe – European Union: ‘A sole ambition for the European continent.’ Report by Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, to the attention of the Heads of State and Government of the Member States of the Council of Europe. 11 April 2006, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/der/docs/RapJuncker_E.pdf, accessed 26 July 2010.Google Scholar
20. Quoted in L. Kubosova (2005) EU discouraged from further overlap in human rights monitoring. EUobserver.com, 7 February 2005, available at: http://euobserver.com/9/18347, accessed 8 October 2008.Google Scholar
21.European Parliament, Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners, T6-0032/2007, 14 February 2007, no. 33.Google Scholar
22.Committee of Ministers, Memorandum of Understanding between the Council of Europe and the European Union, CM (2007) 74, 10 May 2007.Google Scholar
23.Council of Europe, Signing of a cooperation agreement between PACE and EP, Press Release 847, 28 November 2007.Google Scholar
24. A recent overview on the co-operation between the CoE and the EU can be found in Committee of Ministers, Co-operation between the Council of Europe and the European Union. Report for the 120th Ministerial Session, CM (2010) 52, 6 May 2010.Google Scholar
25.Times Online. Putin accuses US of undermining vote as Russia sets date for presidential polls, 27 November 2007, available at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2949069.ece, accessed 9 October 2008.Google Scholar
26. S. Richter and W. Zellner (2008) A New Helsinki for the OSCE? Chances for a revival of the European security dialogue. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Comments, No. 31, Berlin; P. Nopens (2010) A new security architecture for Europe? Russian proposals and western reactions, Part II, Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations Security Policy Brief, No. 10, Brussels.Google Scholar
27.Althauser, C. D. (1997) Rußlands Weg in den Europarat (Münster: LIT).Google Scholar
28.Francis, C. (2008) ‘Selective affinities’: the reactions of the Council of Europe and the European Union to the second armed conflict in Chechnya (1999-2006). Europe-Asia Studies, 60, pp. 317–338; K. Brummer (2010) Enhancing intergovernmentalism: the Council of Europe and human rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 14, pp. 280–299.Google Scholar
29.Council of Europe, Carl Bildt condemns Russia's recognition of independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Press Release 598, 26 August 2008.Google Scholar
30.Council of Europe, Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis: Russia cannot have it both ways, Press Release 596, 26 August 2008.Google Scholar
31.Parliamentary Assembly, Reconsideration of previously ratified credentials of the Russian delegation on substantial grounds, Resolution 1631, 1 October 2008.Google Scholar
32.Parliamentary Assembly, Reconsideration on substantive grounds of previously ratified credentials of the Russian delegation (Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly), Resolution 1687, 1 October 2009.Google Scholar
33.Parliamentary Assembly, The war between Georgia and Russia: one year after, Resolution 1683, 29 September 2009.Google Scholar
34.Parliamentary Assembly, Reconsideration on substantive grounds of previously ratified credentials of the Russian delegation (Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly), Resolution 1687, 1 October 2009.Google Scholar
35.Brummer, K. (2010) Enhancing intergovernmentalism: the Council of Europe and human rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 14, pp. 280–299.Google Scholar
36. Treaty Office of the Council of Europe, available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeTraites.asp?CM=12&CL=ENG, accessed 11 March 2011.Google Scholar
37. However, both the United States of America and Japan are observers although they have not abolished the death penalty.Google Scholar
38.Parliamentary Assembly, External relations of the Council of Europe, Recommendation 1753, 26 June 2006.Google Scholar
39.Committee of Ministers, External relations of the Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1753 (2006). Reply adopted by the Committee of Ministers, CM/AS (2007) Recommendation 1753, 19 January 2007.Google Scholar
40.Parliamentary Assembly, Establishment of a ‘partner for democracy’ status with the Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1680, 26 June 2009.Google Scholar
41.Whitman, R. and Wolff, S. (eds) (2010) The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective. Context, Implementation and Impact (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
42. J. Polakiewicz (1999) Treaty-Making in the Council of Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press).Google Scholar
43. Treaty Office of the Council of Europe, available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeTraites.asp?CM=8&CL=ENG, accessed 11 March 2011.Google Scholar
44. These and the following numbers (all as of 24 March 2011) can be found on the website of the Treaty Office, available at: http://conventions/coe.int, accessed 24 March 2011.Google Scholar
45.Jaskiernia, J. (2003) The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (Warsaw: Council of Europe Information Office), p. 374.Google Scholar
46.Committee of Ministers, 117th Session of the Committee of Ministers (Strasbourg, 10-11 May 2007). Conclusions of the Chair, CM (2007) 66 final, 10 May 2007.Google Scholar