Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T06:15:51.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leading Successful Negotiations on Behalf of Europe: An Analysis of the European Commission High-Ranking Officials’ Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

Alain Pekar Lempereur*
Affiliation:
Institute for Research and Education on Negotiation in Europe, ESSEC Business School, Av. Bernard Hirsch, 95021 Cergy-Pontoise Cédex, France. E-mail: lempereur@essec.fr

Abstract

Permanent dialogue, steered by continual negotiation, was the driving force behind the construction of Post-War Europe. In this context, the countries of the European Union have extended the mandate of the European Commission (EC) to negotiate an increasing number of topics, giving the EC’s high-ranking officials a pre-eminent role of agents in the process. It is, then, urgent and useful to investigate these negotiators’ practices, to list a number of recurrent features, and to compare them with current negotiation theories. In 2004, at the request of the EC, 15 in-depth interviews were conducted with high-ranking EC officials, from different directorates, in charge of top-level negotiations. An interview guide was drawn up to address the five following points:

  • the success factors in negotiation,

  • the reasons for failure,

  • the management of people, relationships, cultural aspects, the mandate, and the stakeholders’ map,

  • the management of substantive issues and their solutions, including the use of justification criteria,

  • the management of the process, agenda, multilateral mechanisms, and communication.

Following the interviews, a report was submitted to the EC’s General Administration Directorate. The report highlights a number of features that may favour the success of European negotiators. In what follows, some keys to success are linked to three dimensions of negotiation: process, people, and problem.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)