Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:26:05.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sesgo lingüístico en neurociencia: ¿está situada la Torre de Babel en Alemania?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

S. Heres ,
S. Wagenpfeil ,
J. Hamann ,
W. Kissling  and
S. Leucht
S. Heres
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, Munich, 81675, Alemania
S. Wagenpfeil
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, Munich, 81675, Alemania
J. Hamann
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, Munich, 81675, Alemania
W. Kissling
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, Munich, 81675, Alemania
S. Leucht
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, Munich, 81675, Alemania
Get access

Resumen

En medicina interna, los autores alemanes tienden a publicar los ensayos controlados distribuidos al azar (ECDA) con hallazgos no significativos en revistas alemanas y los ECDA con hallazgos significativos en revistas internacionales. En las neurociencias, se vio una tendencia similar, pero los hallazgos no eran estadísticamente significativos. La razón para este hallazgo no concluyente podría ser el bajo número de ECDA publicados en lengua alemana.

Keywords

PsiquiatríaSesgo (epidemiología)Ensayos controlados distribuidos al azarEdiciónAlemánLengua
Type
Comunicación breve
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 11 , Issue 8 , November 2004 , pp. 522 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Chalmers, I, Adams, M, Dickersin, K, Hetherington, J, Tarnow Mordi, W, Meinert, C, et al.A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. JAMA 1990;263:1401–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, M, Zellweger-Zahner, T, Schneider, M, Junker, C, Lengeler, C, Antes, G.Language bias in randomised controlled trrals published in English and Germán 1. Lancet 1997;350:326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egger, M, Davey, SG, Schneider, M, Minder, C.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoire, G, Derderian, F, Le Lorier, J.Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadad, AR, Moore, RA, Carroll, D, Jcnkinson, C, Reynolds, DJ, Gavaghan, DJ, et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juni, P, Holenstein, F, Sterne, J, Bartlett, C, Egger, M.Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31: 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAuley, L, Pham, B, Tugwell, P, Moher, D.Does the inclusión of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 2000;356:1228–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Fortin, P, Jadad, AR, Juni, P, Klassen, T, Le Lorier, J, et al.Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 1996;347:363–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Pham, B, Jones, A, Cook, DJ, Jadad, AR, Moher, M, et al.Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352:609–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Pham, B, Klassen, TP, Schulz, KF, Berlin, JA, Jadad, AR, etal. What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:964–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed