Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:53:46.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recognition, feelings of injustice and claim justification: a case study of deaf people's storytelling on the internet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2013

Rousiley C. M. Maia  and
Regiane L. O. Garcêz
Rousiley C. M. Maia*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Social Communication, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Regiane L. O. Garcêz
Affiliation:
PhD Student, Social Communication, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
*E-mail: rousiley@fafich.ufmg.br; rousiley@yahoo.com.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that Honneth's theory of recognition opens promising venues for exploring the role of emotion in politics, particularly when issues of injustice are at stake. While endorsing Honneth's view that ‘feelings of injustice’ are an important source for intelligibility of injustice, and that disadvantaged individuals need to build a ‘shared interpretative framework’ in struggles for recognition, this article contends that a more nuanced account of discursive justification is required to deal with dissent and moral disagreement. As a response to this problem, we suggest that Honneth's approach of subjective reaction to injury as violation of conditions to practical identity can be brought together with notions of discursive justification in the Habermasian fashion. Through an empirically based analysis – using storytelling of deaf people gathered in two virtual environments: (a) the website of the main Brazilian organization for deaf persons (FENEIS), and (b) Orkut, an online social network – this paper evinces that subjects not only articulate feelings of injustice or claims for recognition in everyday experience, but also usually engage in interpretation, judgment and justification of such claims. Results show that Honneth's theory of recognition, when articulated with a notion of discursive justification, can better equip scholars concerned with practices that aim to overcome injustice.

Keywords

recognitionstorytellingemotionjustificationdeaf people
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 359 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J.C. Lara, M.P. (1996), ‘Honneth's new critical theory of recognition’, New Left Review I(220): 126–136.Google Scholar
Arneil, B. (2009), ‘Disability, self image and modern political theory’, Political Theory 37(2): 218–242.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (2012), ‘Passionate participation: emotional experiences and expression in deliberative forums’, in S. Thompson and P. Hoggett (eds), Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies, New York: Continuum, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Bickford, S. (2011), ‘Emotion talk and political judgment’, The Journal of Politics 73(4): 1025–1037.Google Scholar
Black, L.W. (2008), ‘Deliberation, storytelling and dialogic moments’, Communication Theory 18: 93–116.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (1999), Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, S. Kafer, A. (2010), Deaf and Disability Studies: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, G. (2011), ‘Disability and misrecognition’, in S. Thompson and M. Yar (eds), The Politics of Misrecognition, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 105–125.Google Scholar
Cole, P. (2007), ‘The body politic: theorizing disability and impairment’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(2): 169–176.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2012), ‘Communication in movement: social movements as agents of participatory democracy’, in B.D. Loader and D. Mercea (eds), Social Media and Democracy: Innovations in Participatory Politics, New York: Routledge, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Deranty, J.P. (2009), Beyond Communication: A Critical Study of Axel Honneth, Boston: Drill.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, R. (2009), Identity, Difference Politics: How Difference is Produced, and Why it Matters, Vancouver, Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Federação Nacional de Educação e Integração dos Surdos (2009), Retrieved 20 September 2009 from http://www.feneis.org.br.Google Scholar
Forum Vergonha SURDO (2005). Retrieved 30 August 2009 from http://www.orkut.com/CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=428446&tid=10024425.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2002), Contexts of Justice: Political Philosophy Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, Berkley, LA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2007), ‘First things first: redistribution, recognition and justification’, European Journal of Political Theory 6(3): 291–304.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2003), ‘Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation’, in N. Fraser and A. Honneth (eds), Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, New York: Verso, pp. 7–109.Google Scholar
Garcêz, R.L. Maia, R.C.M. (2009), ‘The struggle for recognition of the deaf on the internet: the political function of storytelling’, Communication, Politics & Culture 42(2): 45–64.Google Scholar
Goodley, D. Tragaskis, C. (2006), ‘Storying disability and impairment: retrospective accounts of disabled family life’, Qualitative Health Research 16: 630–646.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1995), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2003), ‘Redistribution as recognition: a response to Nancy Fraser. The point of recognition: a rejoinder to the rejoinder’, in N. Fraser and A. Honneth (eds), Redistribution or recognition: a political-philosophical exchange, Nova York: Verso, pp. 110–159.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2007a), ‘Recognition as ideology’, in B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen (eds), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323–347.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2007b), ‘Between Aristotle and Kant: recognition and moral obligation’, in Honneth, A. (ed.), Disrespect: The Normative Foundation of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 129–143.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2012), The I in We: Studies in Theory of Recognition, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, A. (1999), ‘Theory of recognition: critical theory at the crossroads: comments on Axel Honneth's’, European Journal of Social Theory 2(1): 99–108.Google Scholar
Kompridis, N. (2007), ‘Struggling over the meaning of recognition: a matter of identity, justice or freedom’, European Journal of Political Theory 6(3): 277–289.Google Scholar
Krause, S.R. (2008), Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation, New Jersey: Princeton.Google Scholar
Lane, H. (1984), When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf, New York: Ramdon House.Google Scholar
Mackuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L. Marcus, G.E. (2010), ‘Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation’, American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 440–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, R.C.M. (2012a), ‘Political talk and democratic deliberation’, in Maia, R. (ed.), Deliberation: the Media and Political Talk, New York: Hampton Press, pp. 211–226.Google Scholar
Maia, R.C.M. (2012b), ‘Non-electoral representation: expanding discursive domains’, Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy 48: 429–443.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.E., Neuman, W.R. Mackuen, M. (2000), Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, M.A. (2003), ‘Impassioned democracy: the role of emotion in deliberative theory’. Paper presented at the Democracy Collaborative Affiliates Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (1995), ‘Emotions and women's capabilities’, in M.C. Nussbaum and J. Glover (eds), Women, Culture, and Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 360–395.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003), Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2011) (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Cultures on Social Network Sites, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perlin, G. (1998), ‘Identidades surdas’, in C.B. Skliar (ed.), A surdez: um olhar sobre as diferenças, Porto Alegre: Mediação.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. (2008), ‘Just talk: public deliberation after 9/11’, Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. Lee, J. (2006), ‘Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11’, American Sociological Review 71(5): 699–723.Google Scholar
Quadros, R.M. (2012), ‘Linguistic policies, linguistic planning, and Brazilian sign language in Brazil’, Sign Language Studies 12: 543–564.Google Scholar
Rehg, W. (1994), Insight and Solidarity: The Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Retzinger, S. (1991), Violent Emotions: Shame and Rage in Marital Quarrels, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ryfe, D.M. (2006), ‘Narrative and deliberation in small group forums’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 34(1): 72–93.Google Scholar
Sacks, O. (1989), Seeing Voices: A Journey into the World of the Deaf, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schrock, D., Holden, D. Reid, L. (2004), ‘Creating emotional resonance: interpersonal emotion work and motivational framing in a transgender community’, Journal of Social Problems 51(1): 61–81.Google Scholar
Smith, B. Sparkes, A.C. (2008), ‘Narrative and its potential contribution to disability studies’, Disability & Society 23(1): 17–28.Google Scholar
Steiner, J. (2012), ‘Rationality and stories in deliberative justification’, in Steiner, J. (ed.), The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–87.Google Scholar
Strobel, K.L. (2006), ‘Visão histórica sobre a in(ex)clusão dos surdos’, ETD – Educação Temática Digital 7(2): 244–252.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1994), ‘The politics of recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–73.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (2004), ‘How is disability understood? An examination of sociological’, Approaches Disability & Society 19(6): 569–583.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. (2006), The Political Theory of Recognition: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Hoggett, P. (eds) (2012), Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tully, J. (2000), ‘Struggles over recognition and distribution’, Constellations 7(4): 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J. (2004), ‘Recognition and dialogue: the emergence of a new field’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7(3): 84–106.Google Scholar
Whittier, N. (2001), ‘Emotional strategies: the collective reconstruction and display of oppositional emotions in the movement against child sexual abuse’, in J. Goodwin, J.M. Jasper and F. Polletta (eds), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar